What exactly was your compulsion in making such a post and thread? Painting aggressors as victims of circumstance when the real victims of this week's atrocities aren't even in the ground yet?
Every single time there is a major attack in the West we see this attitude- "it's your own fault", "you brought it on yourselves" etc. How about you keep your thoughts and unsolicited opinions to yourself?
This is ISIS sympathising as far as I am concerned- which is banned by PDF supposedly.
Shall we just ignore the fact that most of the 9/11 terrorists were Saudis from comfortable backgrounds, the Detroit "underwear bomber" was the son of a high ranking Nigerian official who studied abroad at expensive schools etc etc they weren't "blowback" from Western invasions/actions in the ME.
+ classy that you conveniently left India/Mumbai from the list of attacks you condemn.
No condemnation for your state/agencies? They have no role whatsoever in the current web of international terrorism that exists in that region? Pakistan has not been a major hub for these activities for the past decade? This kind of selective condemnation/outrage entirely undermines everything you have to say sir.
Someone coming from a nation who has made the "good/bad" terrorist double-speak into an art form doesn't need to be lecturing anyone that they don't deserve to feel grief in these horrid times. Do you think using the word "condemn" enough times would hide the overarching sentiment of your post which is "you deserved it"?
I condemn all cowards who would attack civilians anywhere in the world- Paris, London, NYC, Mumbai, Karachi, Peshawar, Kabul, Beirut, Baghdad etc etc. There is no justification for this, anyone who has ever played a hand in such actives will surely have to answer for it when they meet their maker. There. It is said. You don't need to go into a roundabout qualification of such condemnation.
"before you condemn the Paris attack" what a horrid title choice sir.
@FrenchPilot @Taygibay @Spectre @ranjeet @Aminroop