What's new

Before Kathua attack, Pak objected to Indian cameras on the border

No man it is your dream.
It isn't video game it is war.
so losses on both sides.

Losses are way reduced on our sides because of their technology and elite training.
In future we will deploy F INSAS then it will again screwed your so called freedom fighters .
You dont need to go anywhere .There is a lots of thread in here were the RR ops with zero casualities .
 
.
Who give a damn, Continue implementing
 
.
Losses are way reduced on our sides because of their technology and elite training.
In future we will deploy F INSAS then it will again screwed your so called freedom fighters .
You dont need to go anywhere .There is a lots of thread in here were the RR ops with zero casualities .
These are fake encounters with zero causality.
Just visit training camp to check motivation,training and moral of youngsters.
My fist comment was "We don;t fear of anything" so your F-insas are useless.
 
. .
And we also have a lots of fronts and options.
And dont drag Chinese in to here .They wont go for a war with us .
We wont waste our source for war with a nation that is still relying on aids.
We have a lots of other options .:) And we dont need to fire a single bullet for that.
Man if there would be a way by which india doesn't have to fire a bullet they surely have gone for it. India, theoratically cna beat pak (as per rule a 3 times invasion force can defeat a holding amry). But the cost would be too high that india will degenerate it self.
China won't fight unless india don't hurt her intrests. till now china is doing openly all things (border patrol, new ports, new pacts with all neighbors) and india just protest about it.
 
.
You cannot do anything in balochistan. First, you need a host for destabalisation. many armed ''sardars" repented and now in jails. 2nd. you don't share border with taht. 3rd you need physicla presence to dismantle a part (an invasion). 4th God knows what would happen if you succeeded doing first 3 as it would turn sub continent to an nferno

Like you said if there is a will then there is a way.And according to our decorated NSA who spends long seven years as a spy in Pakistan ,Pakistan has a lots of vulneribilities .Several times higher than India .Now we have economic ,diplomatic and geopolitical clout .And it will again in future .
If we intended for that we can do that in a blink of an eye.But we wont because a break down of Pakistan will cause unstability in this region.
 
. .
Man if there would be a way by which india doesn't have to fire a bullet they surely have gone for it. India, theoratically cna beat pak (as per rule a 3 times invasion force can defeat a holding amry). But the cost would be too high that india will degenerate it self.
China won't fight unless india don't hurt her intrests. till now china is doing openly all things (border patrol, new ports, new pacts with all neighbors) and india just protest about it.

give us one good reason to attack pak... you are no kuwait/saudi with huge oil reserves to get attacked..
 
.
These are fake encounters with zero causality.
Just visit training camp to check motivation,training and moral of youngsters.
My fist comment was "We don;t fear of anything" so your F-insas are useless.


Then that is what we called as stupidity.Because your fearlessness make things way easy to us.
We dont need to visit terrorists factories in Azad Kashmir .Last year you done an elaborate preparation for infilitration with your factory products and our 50000 rounds ammunitions blown them out in to oblivion.
We will do that again.
 
.
Then that is what we called as stupidity.Because your fearlessness make things way easy to us.
We dont need to visit terrorists factories in Azad Kashmir .Last year you done an elaborate preparation for infilitration with your factory products and our 50000 rounds ammunitions blown them out in to oblivion.
We will do that again.
Please share reasonable source.
 
.
.
Man if there would be a way by which india doesn't have to fire a bullet they surely have gone for it. India, theoratically cna beat pak (as per rule a 3 times invasion force can defeat a holding amry). But the cost would be too high that india will degenerate it self.
China won't fight unless india don't hurt her intrests. till now china is doing openly all things (border patrol, new ports, new pacts with all neighbors) and india just protest about it.

I already told you .We wont fight with an aid relying nation.Who told about invasion ? we dont have any mental problems to invade a moth eaten land.There is a lots options.China is already checkmated in SL and other islands except in Maldives and we will do that with the support of our allies .
Dont drag Chinese here that is not the topic.
 
.
Like you said if there is a will then there is a way.And according to our decorated NSA who spends long seven years as a spy in Pakistan ,Pakistan has a lots of vulneribilities .
I know very well what he said. Point is Pakistan in 2008, 2009 was at its weakest point. Osama, salala, Mehran base, PAF base, bomb blasts, Taliban, Balochistan etc. India couldn't do anything back then despite a stand off. At that point india enjoys huge support from AFG, US, within pak too :P etc. Now the table has turned. So you telling me you can do all with 'blink of eye' now...???? I don't think so.
 
.
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom