What's new

Battle of ALCMs : BrahMos A vs Pakistan’s Ra’ad

. .

First is just me or the links are going to another site? why?

Also the system u posted is land based! Where does the PA or PN has this?

leave them sir they are in a state of DENIAL and nothing else
Post ANY Chinese system , does it automatically means that PA or PN or PAF has it - is correct?
 
.
Yj-12 or YJ-1000 Reverse Engineered KH-1


Yj-18 Super sonic at terminal stage


CX-1 Is Prototype

CM-400 KG is not Proper Cruise Missile It follows Ballistic trajectory Makes it Vulnerable against Radars
Missile get is Speed And Terminal Stage

"A list of system features appears to confirm an unusual characteristic associated with the CM-400. Unlike most high-speed cruise missiles, which fly at low altitude to avoid detection, the CM-400 uses “high [altitude] launching” to achieve “higher aircraft survivability”, according to the video".

A fighter such as the Chengdu/Pakistan Aeronautical Complex JF-17 would launch the missile at speeds between Mach 0.7 and M0.9 at an elevation between 26,200ft and 39,400ft, according to the AVIC specifications.


Source :
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-393301/
http://missilethreat.com/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-missile-for-jf-17/

You knows about every thing about as you were with those who made that system in China bit rest of the world didn't know about your stuff as its big secret wow.

Dear YJ-100 is separate system with range of 800km and India don't have any thing in its class. YJ-12 & YJ-18 are enough potent that USN take them as very potent threat and YJ-12 comes in ARM version too with 400km range.

now have you seen any of those weapon used in all modes of engagement?? No. But still you think you know every thing. :D
 
.


Pakistan still not Have Acquired Such HQ-16

Its Derivative of Russian Buk Missile System Comparable to Akash Missile

issile of the HQ-16 evolved from the Soviet 9M38 missile, used by the Buk. However the Chinese missile is more capable than its predecessor.

The HQ-16 has a maximum range against aircraft of 40 km. It can engage cruise missiles at a range of 3.5 to 18 km. This air defense system can engage very low flying and high altitude targets. It can reach targets at an altitude of up to 18 km. Claimed hit probability of an aircraft with a single missile is 85%. Hit probability of a cruise missile is 60%.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buk_missile_system#3S90M_.22Shtil-1.22

http://www.military-today.com/missiles/hq16.htm


NOW compare it With Barak-8 Which Has Range of 90 -100 KM
[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
.
Yj-12 or YJ-1000 Reverse Engineered KH-1


Yj-18 Super sonic at terminal stage


CX-1 Is Prototype

CM-400 KG is not Proper Cruise Missile It follows Ballistic trajectory Makes it Vulnerable against Radars
Missile get is Speed And Terminal Stage

"A list of system features appears to confirm an unusual characteristic associated with the CM-400. Unlike most high-speed cruise missiles, which fly at low altitude to avoid detection, the CM-400 uses “high [altitude] launching” to achieve “higher aircraft survivability”, according to the video".

A fighter such as the Chengdu/Pakistan Aeronautical Complex JF-17 would launch the missile at speeds between Mach 0.7 and M0.9 at an elevation between 26,200ft and 39,400ft, according to the AVIC specifications.


Source :
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-393301/
http://missilethreat.com/dubai-china-details-performance-of-carrier-killer-missile-for-jf-17/
so what its build for speed not live fool paradise that JF-17 can't launch CM-400AGK give me source that stated that it can't be launch from JF-17 as usual Indian superiority complex:hitwall::hitwall::girl_wacko::girl_wacko::girl_wink::girl_wink::girl_wink::sarcastic::sarcastic::blah::p::p::p:
 
.
First is just me or the links are going to another site? why?

Also the system u posted is land based! Where does the PA or PN has this?


Post ANY Chinese system , does it automatically means that PA or PN or PAF has it - is correct?

PN on land bases is covered by PAF Systems there is very high level of synergy in between PN, PAF and PA in NCW environment assets are deployed in a manner which have maximum benifit. First time PN is now capable of hitting both land and sea targets at standoff range from land.


Don't have to compare it with Barak because both SAMS provide good protection to their users against posed threat from adversary.
 
.
Dear YJ-100 is separate system with range of 800km and India don't have any thing in its class. YJ-12 & YJ-18 are enough potent that USN take them as very potent threat and YJ-12 comes in ARM version too with 400km range.
Brahmos has Range 500 KM With Modification offered By russia As its Derivative of P-800 Oniks


New block-3 of Brahmos has Modified range of 500 Km
India has uprated its BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles by installing the advanced satellite navigation systems from Russia's Kh-555 and Kh-101 strategic long-range cruise missiles, adding GPS-GLONASS technology to the existing doppler-inertial platform, Izvestia reported on Tuesday quoting sources in the military-industrial complex


The integration of the navigation systems from Kh-555 will turn BrahMos, a supersonic cruise missile, into a "super-rocket" with almost a sub-strategic capability above its normal tactical range, capable of hitting targets over 180-300 miles (300-500 km),



Here From the Russian Source

http://sputniknews.com/military/20121009/176500812.html
 
.
First is just me or the links are going to another site? why?

Also the system u posted is land based! Where does the PA or PN has this?


Post ANY Chinese system , does it automatically means that PA or PN or PAF has it - is correct?
it is order and inducted in 2012, oh i forget it PAF should inform to @GuardianRED that we were getting CM-400 AGK:lol::lol::blah::sarcastic::sarcastic: what a insane penson you are:hitwall::hitwall:
 
.
so what its build for speed not live fool paradise that JF-17 can't launch CM-400AGK give me source that stated that it can't be launch from JF-17 as usual Indian superiority complex:hitwall::hitwall::girl_wacko::girl_wacko::girl_wink::girl_wink::girl_wink::sarcastic::sarcastic::blah::p::p::p:
It can be Detected Way before Due it ballistic Trajectory By Radars on Aircraft carriers And CBG and countered
 
.
PN on land bases is covered by PAF Systems there is very high level of synergy in between PN, PAF and PA in NCW environment assets are deployed in a manner which have maximum benifit. First time PN is now capable of hitting both land and sea targets at standoff range from land.



Don't have to compare it with Barak because both SAMS provide good protection to their users against posed threat from adversary.
??? PN land targets sea targets??? how ??? u do know that the system u have stated is a Surface to air defensive system ?

it is order and inducted in 2012, oh i forget it PAF should inform to @GuardianRED that we were getting CM-400 AGK:lol::lol::blah::sarcastic::sarcastic: what a insane penson you are:hitwall::hitwall:
LOL u haven't Provided ONE DECENT source that it is inducted in the PAF, hence your own PAF officer has quoted saying that it is not inducted BUT u like to live in Denial! good work!
 
. .
It can be Detected Way before Due it ballistic Trajectory By Radars on Aircraft carriers And CBG and countered

same for brahmos and both missile will give its adversary very little time to react. Pakistan have LY-80E in use which is definitely Customized as per its requirements which is norm of Pakistani purchases from China.

detection is other thing but interception of this missile is almost impossible

When India have a system its best, but if any adversary country get similar or better tech or system its junk.
 
.
detection is other thing but interception of this missile is almost impossible
Its Initial Speed is 0.8 And 0.9 Mach At Quoted by flight global

A Advanced Systems Like Aegis or SM-3 or barak-8 Will Intercept it in Mid Source before terminal phase
 
.
LOL u haven't Provided ONE DECENT source that it is inducted in the PAF, hence your own PAF officer has quoted saying that it is not inducted BUT u like to live in Denial! good work!
its a surprise for you and your armed forces, give me link PAF said that it is not inducted, he say nothing about it wether inducted or not:crazy::hitwall::blah::blah:
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom