Bangladeshis would rather swim to Italy than come to India, says outgoing envoy

[mmr]

Nope. The inflation difference says otherwise. Also correlated to the standards these countries employ regd IMF (SDDS vs GDDS). The more basic your standards, the more inflation you can push.

This is exacerbated by BD over reliance on one export industry which it is hooked on to earn forex (and built up only by having LDC 0 tariff access).

It is not trading much of anything else (thus very limited genuine economic integration and exposure to different world liquidity chains), thus extrapolating that to Taka GDP claim of BD govt is going to be faulty given the lower standards used.

Especially given this household inflation on the ground (leading to household income decline) that BD govt to this day still doesnt give a response to:

https://opinion.bdnews24.com/2017/12/18/where-did-the-benefits-of-economic-growth-disappear/



Read above. Having that figure contain 1% relative inflation or 50% relative inflation to world liquidity standard (and shielded by poor economic standard adoption + shielding by grossly limited economic exposure) are VERY different figures in the end.

This is also why BD has an atrocious PPP multiplier.

This is also why BD has an atrocious Market cap. (70 billion now, compared to India 2 trillion plus...do the scaling by population yourself)

This is also why BD has an atrociously corrupt govt and terrible ease of doing business.

And finally this is why BD can only afford 300 million dollars of reverse investment into other countries in one year at most (and in fact by stock saw a decline, it couldnt even keep up with depreciation of these assets outside). And again, you guessed it....atrocious (when compared to its govt taka GDP claim - again illustrating the entrenched inflation there).

Thus whenever BD actually has to deliver the goods past its govt claims....the 50% of GDP = effectively inflation rears its head. So no one gives a shit in the end if your govt says whatever growth rate, given only half of it actually applies in the end (can simply look at what energy you guys consume for example).

As for Nepal, Indian open borders with that country and where a huge bulk of Nepali workers go (and in what scale) given what I said to cities like Delhi says more than anything else can regarding that.

I will simply ignore your ranting and accept imf data. Which shows pak bd india and nepal all same classification lower middle income third world countries. It dont matter what bd government says or does.

Now i will believe if chinese ppl say Vietnam ppl go there for work cause they have 5 times higher per capital same as mexcio usa. Neighbors correct but lot richer in these two examples. South asia as a whole is more or less third world. No matter how long some one write an essay wont change the reality. Hence ppl from one third world wont go to another third world country for better jobs. Its simple.

 

[Nilgiri]

and accept imf data

OK, but have you looked at the IMF standards?

What is the difference between GDDS and SDDS? Tell me in a few words.

If Gambia says its growing at 10%, is it AS credible as when sweden posts 4% growth? Just to illustrate one extreme of this concept.

Which shows pak bd india and nepal all same classification lower middle income third world countries.

You asked for basic analysis of why migrations happen. These are huge population countries....Averages count only for so much, no country is homogenized around a pure average, there is a normal distribution. What's next you going to tell me that there is no migration going on in South America say between Brazil and Peru and Argentina and so on?....simply because they are all roughly the same income level band?....and we should discount the overall larger scale of Brazil (given its amount of cities relative to the others) and its total wealth?

This is the whole basis of the UN estimate for amount of BD migrants inside India (and vice versa). Or suddenly do you not accept that? UN not credible suddenly?

Simply put (going past even the actual real GDP per capita argument in the end), India by its sheer size has much more vast presence of economic areas (cities) earning in 5k, 10k and so on kind of levels than Bangladesh does. Add on top that there are totally different migrations happening at different economic scale governing the poorest in BD (in border areas) w.r.t Indian border states.

 

[mmr]

OK, but have you looked at the IMF standards?

What is the difference between GDDS and SDDS? Tell me in a few words.

If Gambia says its growing at 10%, is it AS credible as when sweden posts 4% growth? Just to illustrate one extreme of this concept.



You asked for basic analysis of why migrations happen. These are huge population countries....Averages count only for so much, no country is homogenized around a pure average, there is a normal distribution. What's next you going to tell me that there is no migration going on in South America say between Brazil and Peru and Argentina and so on?....simply because they are all roughly the same income level band?....and we should discount the overall larger scale of Brazil (given its amount of cities relative to the others) and its total wealth?

This is the whole basis of the UN estimate for amount of BD migrants inside India (and vice versa). Or suddenly do you not accept that? UN not credible suddenly?

Simply put (going past even the actual real GDP per capita argument in the end), India by its sheer size has much more vast presence of economic areas (cities) earning in 5k, 10k and so on kind of levels than Bangladesh does. Add on top that there are totally different migrations happening at different economic scale governing the poorest in BD (in border areas) w.r.t Indian border states.

I dont believe in bd government either and i know they are not truthful about anything. I never defend bal lol show me once i ever said i trust bd government.

What i am trying to tell you south asia minus sri lanka has similar economic problems. And i dont understand why ppl will migrate when there are lot riher countries out there.

 

[suresh1773]

I don't expect much humanity from Hindus. The hatred you have for everybody else is just mind boggling.

I have read somewhere that,yr family escaped from Bangladesh and sought refugee in India

 

[SrNair]

Athu thannae alle njanum paranjathu ??? Pinae thantaku paranjathu. Athu thantae samsaaram ennu karuthi njanangu kshamichu.



Do you seriously expect a genuine reply for your queries above from such nut cases ?? LOL

Amit Shah ,Keralathile mattethu politiciannde koottu ulla politician aani.
Athilum naaritharam kanichavar Keralathilumunde .

Pakshe ayal ippol Indiayude Home Minister aanu .
Thandakku vilikkunathinu kuzhappam illelum oru pauran enna nilayil HM tandakku vilichal chilapol tirichum kettenirikkum.
Avanvande samskarame tirichu kittathullu.

Are you high? Which drugs did you take?


Wah What an example . Space to set up rocket is now a big help given?

All these goods and technology was developed in war, not for my benefit. Moreover, the main reason why USA was able to develop these technology was because of petrodollar whereby Arabs sold oil in dollar and thus gave USA free oil. India, who was holding 10% muslim population was the one which deserved free oil. But it was wrongly given to USA. So, for all practial reason, India was deprived of what it deserved. It was a treachery rather than favour.


The real issue is that muslims have stolen resources and causing economic hardship. By getting back the resources which muslims stole, hardship and economy can be improved.


Who defines who is Indian and who is not and on what basis? Don't tell me that constitution will decide as who is authorised to write the constitution and whether the current constitution is even valid arises. Unless you can talk from the basics, your words will not be accepted. Why should you not be declared illegal and kicked out?

And those who questions the established Indian Constitution wont have any place in India that formed by same Constitution including you .
Absolutely the Constitution of India formulated by commitee headed by the Dr BR Ambedkar and amended several times .
Noone gives a flying eff what you talks about India.
There is the laws in Constitution that defines an Indian irrespective of their religion .
Those who can agree with that will be India and those who are not will be kicked out from India.

 

[AfrazulMandal]

I have read somewhere that,yr family escaped from Bangladesh and sought refugee in India

Long back. During the atrocities on Razakars by Mukti terrorists.

 

[SrNair]

Long back. During the atrocities on Razakars by Mukti terrorists.

Then why you are in India?
Why a Bangladeshi in India?

 

[jamahir]

Yes Indirectly.

Muslim appeasement has led to neglect of other issues. Appease Muslims and divide Hindus on caste basis and win the elections. Rest did not matter

Tell me in simple words :

1. How is a criminal company, SKS Microfinance, allowed to function even now after having been found guilty in many counts of farmer suicides ??

2. What is "Muslim appeasement" and is there nothing called Hindu appeasement ??

3. Who did the "divide Hindus on caste basis" that you are talking about ??

4. What are the "neglect of other issues" you are talking about ??
​

@Tom M @Smarana Mitra

@Krptonite

 

[Smarana Mitra]

And those who questions the established Indian Constitution wont have any place in India that formed by same Constitution including you .
Absolutely the Constitution of India formulated by commitee headed by the Dr BR Ambedkar and amended several times .
Noone gives a flying eff what you talks about India.
There is the laws in Constitution that defines an Indian irrespective of their religion .
Those who can agree with that will be India and those who are not will be kicked out from India.

What nonsense? You appear to have very low IQ and incapable of understanding anything or you are intentionally talking nonsense to cover up your ulterior motives

 

[BL33D]

OK, but have you looked at the IMF standards?

What is the difference between GDDS and SDDS? Tell me in a few words.

If Gambia says its growing at 10%, is it AS credible as when sweden posts 4% growth? Just to illustrate one extreme of this concept.



You asked for basic analysis of why migrations happen. These are huge population countries....Averages count only for so much, no country is homogenized around a pure average, there is a normal distribution. What's next you going to tell me that there is no migration going on in South America say between Brazil and Peru and Argentina and so on?....simply because they are all roughly the same income level band?....and we should discount the overall larger scale of Brazil (given its amount of cities relative to the others) and its total wealth?

This is the whole basis of the UN estimate for amount of BD migrants inside India (and vice versa). Or suddenly do you not accept that? UN not credible suddenly?

Simply put (going past even the actual real GDP per capita argument in the end), India by its sheer size has much more vast presence of economic areas (cities) earning in 5k, 10k and so on kind of levels than Bangladesh does. Add on top that there are totally different migrations happening at different economic scale governing the poorest in BD (in border areas) w.r.t Indian border states.

I dont think he even understands or wants to look at the intricacies of the data. For him any number thats quantitatively bigger compared to India, makes them feel superior without understanding the layers of other factors underneath. Its futile explaining to him further.

 

[Bilal9]

Interesting thing is that this thread has become a match between different kind of Indian posters and there is hardly any Bangladeshi participating in it.

The snake oil being pushed by mostly bhakts is not even worth responding to.

I believe the Bangladesh envoy held a mirror to the deluded Indians' face collectively and pointed out the ugly truth instead of the rosy hawaii mithai sold to them by Chaiwala.

Reality slapped them hard in the face, and they don't like it.

Bangladesh doing better than their effed up country.

Hard to swallow, when they've been told their country is some 'Supa Pawa'...

 

[SIPRA]

The snake oil being pushed by mostly bhakts is not even worth responding to.

I believe the Bangladesh envoy held a mirror to the deluded Indians' face collectively and pointed out the ugly truth instead of the rosy hawaii mithai sold to them by Chaiwala.

Reality slapped them hard in the face, and they don't like it.

Bangladesh doing better than their effed up country.

Hard to swallow, when they've been told their country is some 'Supa Pawa'...

You are right. But my point was that since Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters didn't participate much in this thread; these Indian posters got an opportunity to screw each other thoroughly. This thread has become an Indian orgy.

 

[Bilal9]

You are right. But my point was that since Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters didn't participate much in this thread; these Indian posters got an opportunity to screw each other thoroughly. This thread has become an Indian orgy.

That it did for sure.

 

[Krptonite]

You are right. But my point was that since Bangladeshi and Pakistani posters didn't participate much in this thread; these Indian posters got an opportunity to screw each other thoroughly. This thread has become an Indian orgy.

What you refer to Indians screwing each other over was many sensible posters collectively responding against the xenophobia of two members. It was for unity against those that would divide us, no surprises who members from the other side of the line were rooting for.

Pretty entertaining for everyone I suppose, if thats to your taste, I personally prefer it when the pakistani members get into a brawl, a true free for all orgy.

It's always more entertaining when others do it, notwithstanding the mud on your own clothes.

 

[SIPRA]

What you refer to Indians screwing each other over was many sensible posters collectively responding against the xenophobia of two members. It was for unity against those that would divide us, no surprises who members from the other side of the line were rooting for.

Except for a few, I hardly distinguish between diffrent Indian posters. Fundamentally, most of them entertain same ideas, as far as Pakistan is concerned; though their expressions and modes may vary.

I hardly read any of these posts. Only got a general feeling that an entertaining orgy is going on, between softcore and hardcore Sanghis and Bhakts.

Pretty entertaining for everyone I suppose, if thats to your taste, I personally prefer it when the pakistani members get into a brawl, a true free for all orgy.

I already knew it, but a good confirmation from you, that this feeling of entertainment is reciprocal.