What's new

Bangladesh protests Pakistan Parliament resolutions

The Pakistani parliament should not have brought up the resolution on Qader Mollah's hanging. This did a great disfavor to the nationalist movement to Bangladesh. This incident has allowed the Haseena regime to blame everything on Pakistan just as everyone was starting to find out India's deeds and the anti-indian sentiment was on the rise.

If parliamentarians were smart they should have passed the resolution against India for sponsoring the hanging. That way you would have showed your displeasure and also got brownie points from Bangladeshis.:lol:
 
.
Pakistanis should just burn the effigy of Bangladesh founder Sheikh Mujibur rehman in response and get this drama over with :lol:
 
.
Urdu which they could speak and write was a foreign language, but English is their master's language.

English was used in Bengal because of British rule which was taught in universities and school. British promoted Urdu in Punjab as a provincial language while Bengali was promote in Bengal as a provincial languages. Had British introduced Urdu in in Bengal, there wouldn't have been so opposition for Urdu in Bengal.
 
. . . . .
Now you are just playing with the words. It's not enforcing language. For last 7-8 years Jinnah was saying Urdu would be official language of Pakistan. Why bengali's didn't object it than????

On this statement of urs, Bangladeshis will take over from here. :) @IamBengali @Matrixx

If he didn't had a beard and show masses he pray 5 times publically it doesn't mean he wasn't religious. Personal accounts in Urdu of people close to Jinnah indicated he was as religious as any Molvi but he didn't flaunt it in public

You mean you want to contest senior journalists and historians of Pakistan? Coz they have a completely opposite view than urs.
 
.
On this statement of urs, Bangladeshis will take over from here. :) @IamBengali @Matrixx



You mean you want to contest senior journalists and historians of Pakistan? Coz they have a completely opposite view than urs.

Prior to 1933, He was very liberal. After 1933, when he became involved in Pakistan movement, He reformed. Became religious. Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, Moulana Shaukat Ali Thanvi, Pir Meher Ali Shah accounts about Jinnah are worth reading too which are in Urdu
 
.
You are right but some over reactive immature guys write anything on forum without proper knowledge.

Do you know how much burden those illegal Bagalis are on our economy?? and for Indians please don't tell Pakistan what to do as its our matter and it has nothing do with India. They became teacher when some issue regarding Pakistan arises and they don't want others opinion on their issues which effects other countries too. This is their pure hippocratic behavior due to which Pakistan become need of Indian Muslims back in 1940s.
 
. . . . .
Its an individual act. Fact is Pakistani state openly / covertly but staunchly supports terrorists and mass murderers like quader molla, Osama bin laden, dawood ibrahim, haqqanis etc etc. The list is too long. That is an issue worth debating, not emotional sloganeering of the Pakistani crowd.

Correct word is partition, we got freedom from British.

Jinnah got freedom? The guy who the british never sent to jail even one day, who was in secret contact with Churchill all through? Jinnah was the one who kept the imperialists in, as Pakistan firmly sided with imperialists and within years of independence CIA flights were taking off from Peshawar.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom