Bangladesh Per capita income now $1314

[AugenBlick]

This study defines a metropolitan area as an economic region including one or more cities and their surrounding areas, all linked by economic and commuting ties (see Appendix B). This year’s sample is comprised of the 300 largest metropolitan economies in the world for which industry trend data were available, based on the size of their economies in 2014 at purchasing power parity (PPP) rates.

http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Re...global-metro-monitor/bmpp_GMM_final.pdf?la=en

The selection of cities was done on PPP list.
The values there after are on Nominal ....

e.g.
On page 6 the report lists Mumbai GDP per capita as $1990.
But GDP per capita (PPP) of India is $5,855.
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How can there be so much disparity on GDP per capita b/w India's average and it's economic hub....because one of them is nominal and that is mumbai.

 

[extra terrestrial]

The selection of cities was done on PPP list.
The values there after are on Nominal ....

e.g.
On page 6 the report lists Mumbai GDP per capita as $1990.
But GDP per capita (PPP) of India is $5,855.
List of countries by GDP (PPP) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
How can there be so much disparity on GDP per capita b/w India's average and it's economic hub....because one of them is nominal and that is mumbai.

Well, that's only at one point they listed the nominal per capita incomes of some selected cities but the data are all of PPP rates as mentioned in their method section. Besides, nowhere it said Mumbai has a nominal GDP of $200 billion, so we are basically wasting our time...

 

[AugenBlick]

Well, that's only at one point they listed the nominal per capita incomes of some selected cities but the data are all of PPP rates as mentioned in their method section. Besides, nowhere it said Mumbai has a nominal GDP of $200 billion, so we are basically wasting our time...

1990(Nominal per capita) * 12 million population.. = $238 billion
Mumbai Population 2015- Population of Mumbai- Current Population of Bombay

 

[The Great One]

1990(Nominal per capita) * 12 million population.. = $238 billion
Mumbai Population 2015- Population of Mumbai- Current Population of Bombay

Thats actually $23.8 billion.

 

[Kabira]

Pak per capita for 2014-15, $1513, India $1567 and BD $1314.

 

[The Great One]

Pak per capita for 2014-15, $1513, India $1567 and BD $1314.

Genda, tu phir se aa gaya.

 

[Ajai Ghale]

Genda, tu phir se aa gaya.

Ask him Did he learned the Difference between GdP at Market price and Factor Cost

 

[UKBengali]

1990(Nominal per capita) * 12 million population.. = $238 billion
Mumbai Population 2015- Population of Mumbai- Current Population of Bombay

Dude please use some common sense.

If Mumbai has nominal of 240 billion dollars then the rest of Maharashtra would have to share
50 billion between over 100 million people.

I am mathematically capable and can crunch numbers almost like a computer in my brain and so
instantly realisd this figure can only be PPP and not nominal.

 

[extra terrestrial]

Dude please use some common sense.

If Mumbai has nominal of 240 billion dollars then the rest of Maharashtra would have to share
50 billion between over 100 million people.

I am mathematically capable and can crunch numbers almost like a computer in my brain and so
instantly realisd this figure can only be PPP and not nominal.

He showed fake figures, $1990 x 12 million = $23.8 billion (not $238 billion)

 

[The Great One]

I am mathematically capable and can crunch numbers almost like a computer in my brain and so
instantly realisd this figure can only be PPP and not nominal.

This is taking it a wee bit too far.

 

[AugenBlick]

He showed fake figures, $1990 x 12 million = $23.8 billion (not $238 billion)

Oops that is my mistake.

Dude please use some common sense.

If Mumbai has nominal of 240 billion dollars then the rest of Maharashtra would have to share
50 billion between over 100 million people.

I am mathematically capable and can crunch numbers almost like a computer in my brain and so
instantly realisd this figure can only be PPP and not nominal.

yup...
that is why east MH is very very poor (Marathwad and vidharbha) .... That is THE hotspot for farmer suicides.
and NO the figure is Nominal.... also some firms having HO Mumbai and plants in other parts of MH is *sometimes* counted in mumbai due to *regulatory* reasons.

 

[extra terrestrial]

Oops that is my mistake.

yup...
that is why east MH is very very poor (Marathwad and vidharbha) .... That is THE hotspot for farmer suicides.
and NO the figure is Nominal.... also some firms having HO Mumbai and plants in other parts of MH is *sometimes* counted in mumbai due to *regulatory* reasons.

You just admitted your mistake and still claiming Mumbai has a nominal GDP of more than $200 billion? There's no source supporting your claim, Mumbai's nominal GDP must be around $23.8 billion as shown in the calculation.

 

[AugenBlick]

You just admitted your mistake and still claiming Mumbai has a nominal GDP of more than $200 billion? There's no source supporting your claim, Mumbai's nominal GDP must be around $23.8 billion as shown in the calculation.

yup i just wanted to say that mh, has big disparities.
MH has 15% of india's GDP = 200+ bn
and east MH is very poor...due to the reasons i gave

 

[Jackdaws]

Bombay's GDP according to 2008 figures is over $200 billion -

India’s top 15 cities with the highest GDP - Yahoo India Finance

 

[extra terrestrial]

yup i just wanted to say that mh, has big disparities.
MH has 15% of india's GDP = 200+ bn
and east MH is very poor...due to the reasons i gave

Maharashtra can surely have a nominal gdp of over $200 billions but not Mumbai. East Maharashtra being very poor doesn't really prove that Mumbai's got the entire GDP of the state.