What's new

Bangladesh overtakes Pakistan in attracting foreign investors

bangladesh developing or not has 0 impact on Pakistan.
Geographical distance does have a lot of impact but can’t be a defining factor for relations between countries. Case in point is Pakistan - Turkey relations. There are multiple such examples.
I do agree though, that countries next door have a bigger impact.
 
.
About the conspiracy, do you have any evidence? How can you say India killed Mujib? Why would India needlessly destabilise neighboring country? Sheikh Hasina herself is the daughter, she's the Prime Minister too. If India had killed her father she certainly would have found it out and would be very hostile to India. Instead she's going after the real killers who she knows
It is only on the surface that Hasina Bibi thought she hanged the killers of her father. You are asking me to provide evidence to prove my point that India was behind Mujib's killing. However, even Hasina herself cannot find the evidence.

But, in her mind, she knows a day may come when Mullahs will kill her and people will not know who orchestrated the conspiracy behind the killing. It would be India and this is why she is adamant not to displease India by any chance.

About destabilizing a neighboring country, BD, India thinks it is fun to fish in the murky water of a small pond.
 
.
Your premise of alliance of BD, Pakistan, and China is wrong during a military confrontation. Do not expect China to confront India when the latter confronts its eastern and western countries. The USA will get involved causing the prospect of an Asian war that China probably cannot win.

China will definitely get involved even if the US gets involved. CPEC is more important to China than it is to Pakistan. China wont let Pakistan lose a war against India.

We cannot blame India when west Pakistan based PA troops invaded our land to teach lessons to the Kala Aadmi. Do you blame India for that?

i think we believe in 2 different version of events in 1971. i dont want to argue about this. its been 50 years. i blame everyone. Pakistani politicians, Mujib, Pakistan Army, Mukti Bahini, RAW, Indira Gandhia, etc.
 
.
It is only on the surface that Hasina Bibi thought she hanged the killers of her father. You are asking me to provide evidence to prove my point that India was behind Mujib's killing. However, even Hasina herself cannot find the evidence.

But, in her mind, she knows a day may come when Mullahs will kill her and people will not know who orchestrated the conspiracy behind the killing. It would be India and this is why she is adamant not to displease India by any chance.

About destabilizing a neighboring country, BD, India thinks it is fun to fish in the murky water of a small pond.
So you're claiming to know the truth behind the killing of Mujib when her own daughter the prime minister couldn't find evidence. How are you privy to such secrets? Are you reading Hasina's mind? Please share the secrets of this power with us too. India has so much control over Bangladesh that not only the nationalists but the opposition Mullahs too are taking directions from RAW? Seriously? Even the white supremacists don't think that Jews have this much power that you're attributing to India.
 
.
So you're claiming to know the truth behind the killing of Mujib
Those who believe in conspiracy theories do so with blinding faith in their respective theories. Actually, the biggest market of such theories is US. In US, everything from moon landings to JFK to a lot of other things have strong believers and disbelievers. The US government never bothers to answer any of these because there is no end to it.

Indian involvement to anything bad from Afganistan to Pakistan to other countries of SE Asia appears to be a similar thing to me. If Indian agencies are able to do this much without leaving much evidence then they must be really good.

They are good but SO GOOD? Nah.
 
.
China will definitely get involved even if the US gets involved. CPEC is more important to China than it is to Pakistan. China wont let Pakistan lose a war against India.
Your assumption is too far fetched about Chinese involvement. If Pakistan attacks, do not expect China to help it physically. It did not happen in the pats.

And, it never happened that India attacked Pakistan first, India repulsed Pakistani aggressions all the time. Go back to history.

About Pakistan losing wars against India, it lost all the wars, and the UN or some other big country formulated a compromise, and both the armies went back to the internationally recognized borders that include also the LoC in Kashmir.
So you're claiming to know the truth behind the killing of Mujib when her own daughter the prime minister couldn't find evidence. How are you privy to such secrets? Are you reading Hasina's mind?
I do not know if the Police put a surveillance camera on the spot of murder before it happens. But, Police always find the criminal through investigations of the clues left by him.

Think and re-think which country had most to benefit from these killings of Mujib and Zia. It was India who wanted yesman in Dhaka and both Mujib and Zia were nationalists and not India's pet boys. Hasina Bibi is and so she is surviving.
 
Last edited:
.
Your assumption is too far fetched about Chinese involvement. If Pakistan attacks, do not expect China to help it physically. It did not happen in the pats.

back then things were different. China didnt need Pakistan as much as it does now. CPEC wasnt a thing back then. the Old Belt, One Road didnt exist. even the Chinese Navy is getting ports in the Pakistani coast. definitely when a war between Pakistan and India happens, this time China will participate. China doesnt want to rely on the Straits of Malacca alone because of the Indo-Pacific Command which India is a part of.
 
.
definitely when a war between Pakistan and India happens, this time China will participate.
China is a mature country led by mature international-minded politicians. You can rest assured that China will stop you from making aggression, and India is not supposed to invade your country unless your agents cross the international boundary or the LoC.

China will certainly know who is the aggressor. And, in case Pakistan is the aggressor, it will not send its troops. Even if India is the aggressor, it is possible China will do the same. China's policy is not to get involved in some other countries' wars, except possibly North Korea.
China doesnt want to rely on the Straits of Malacca alone because of the Indo-Pacific Command which India is a part of.
Look at the map of China. Its main business center is along the eastern Sea coast where the population is dense. Uighur and Tibet in your north are too sparsely populated. China will use Gwaddar to transport goods to and from Tibet, because it is prohibitively expensive to transport them to the industrial east. Therefore, Gwaddar is good for transport to only these two mountainous regions.

So, China will certainly keep on using Malacca Strait and it will use other routes via Burma that connects its middle south like Kunming and the region surrounding it. Gwaddar to Kunming is a very long route and is thus very expensive to transport goods to and from the Kunming area.

Pakistani people are over-dreaming over Gwaddar and CPEC. CPEC does not foresee industrial belt built by the Chinese companies. It says about building highway and port infrastructues.

I think Pakistan will have to build its own industries by investing its own money. There is no free launch in the bilateral relationship. I read news China wants special guarntee (not just a Sovereign Guarantee writtn on paper) before lending $6 billion to Pakistan.

I have a feeling, China wants to barter a part of your sovereignty in the north in exchange. May be I am wrong, but I will not be surprised if this is the reality. Pakistan must gather its own resources and manpower to do economic activities instead of relying on China's goodwill.
 
.
China is a mature country led by mature international-minded politicians. You can rest assured that China will stop you from making aggression, and India is not supposed to invade your country unless your agents cross the international boundary or the LoC.

China will certainly know who is the aggressor. And, in case Pakistan is the aggressor, it will not send its troops. Even if India is the aggressor, it is possible China will do the same. China's policy is not to get involved in some other countries' wars, except possibly North Korea.

Look at the map of China. Its main business center is along the eastern Sea coast where the population is dense. Uighur and Tibet in your north are too sparsely populated. China will use Gwaddar to transport goods to and from Tibet, because it is prohibitively expensive to transport them to the industrial east. Therefore, Gwaddar is good for transport to only these two mountainous regions.

So, China will certainly keep on using Malacca Strait and it will use other routes via Burma that connects its middle south like Kunming and the region surrounding it. Gwaddar to Kunming is a very long route and is thus very expensive to transport goods to and from the Kunming area.

Pakistani people are over-dreaming over Gwaddar and CPEC. CPEC does not foresee industrial belt built by the Chinese companies. It says about building highway and port infrastructues.

I think Pakistan will have to build its own industries by investing its own money. There is no free launch in the bilateral relationship. I read news China wants special guarntee (not just a Sovereign Guarantee writtn on paper) before lending $6 billion to Pakistan.

I have a feeling, China wants to barter a part of your sovereignty in the north in exchange. May be I am wrong, but I will not be surprised if this is the reality. Pakistan must gather its own resources and manpower to do economic activities instead of relying on China's goodwill.

i disagree. you need to read more about what Chinese have said about CPEC and all the analysis regarding it. but its your opinion.
 
. .
OK. Keep on dreaming, and let us see what keeps on happening.

like i said, read about CPEC and its implications. China isnt investing all these billions in Pakistan because it loves our roti and daal. China and Pakistan arent working so much on military interoperability for no reason. but hey, you might be right, who knows. Pakistan isnt giving China navy bases in Balochistan for fun. finally, you want to act rude on the internet, go for it. keep at it tough guy.
 
.

the work has slowed down, but it is still going ahead. some projects will just take longer to complete than initially planned for. i can even say that with confidence because of people i know in Pakistan that work in real estate and government.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
. .
BANGLADESH IS NO THREAT PAKISTAN IS A THREAT AND EVERYONE INCUDE INDIA AND ISRAEL IS TO DISTROY PAKISTAN ECONOMY

What a lame excuse for our laziness, corruption and incompetency, China is the biggest threat to world but it doesn't stop them from investing there, look at the exports and FDI of china
 
.
Back
Top Bottom