Stuttgart001
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2017
- Messages
- 665
- Reaction score
- -1
- Country
- Location
No one would do such thing.Hmmmm, I can't dispute that, but since we have so far followed the conventional categorization and objectives, do you think the Navy has any plans to initiate proper research on this matter? This is going to require massive innovation and effort, even China hasn't done that.
Armament is designed and development to combat. What its name and how to categorize doesn't matter.
Soviet Union called its carrier as airborne cruiser, and Japan called its carrier as airborne frigate.
Does these names have anything with the nature of these warship ?
Absolutely not.
It is a kind of warship which uses fighers onboard to conduct combat tasks comprising anti-ship, anti-submarine, anti-aircraft.