I don't remember claiming racial superiority over any nationality- in fact, the same was done by Bangladeshi forumers here.
Bangladesh
hasn't yet created a critical mass of highly skilled technologically competent personnel, and neither has the industrial base to absorb technologies as advanced as Nuclear technology. Case in point, your universities didn't offer courses as basic as bachelor's degree in Aeronautical Engineering until 2009 & you still import things as basic as process steam boilers.
Given all that, spending $13 billion on a technology you cant absorb or scale up seems like a very bad choice to me.
Again, as I clearly showed earlier you are spending
2X per capita compared to us in India in terms of GDP or
5X in terms of budget expenditure for science & technology, investing in things that are too advanced for you to absorb. That's like India spending $108 billion.
This is in addition to inefficiencies in your infrastructure projects, but let's not go there for now.
India spending only half of your per capita S&T expenditure & still building nuclear reactors at 1/3rd cost per GW looks like a better bargain to me. Any money spent on the same will be invested back into the Indian economy.
BHEL emerges lowest bidder for NPCIL's ₹10,800 crore-tender for 6X700MW Turbine Islands
Actually, India is well ahead in terms of education-related indicators in HDI-EYS & MYS. Wonder how that happened when Indian govts never cared about improving the welfare of the poor people.
View attachment 770548
This is for 2020, we are in 2021. I know where this obsession with 2020 data is coming from, given that you can only claim a higher nominal per capita than India only during a period of pandemic induced contraction.
I see there is a whole thread running on this forum calling out your statistical office for its inaccuracies. The doubts expressed about the Tax to GDP ratio on the other thread seems justified now.
Even your economists seem not too convinced with your data. How to achieve GDP growth even with decreasing exports, in an export-led economy?
The government further said export revenue in that fiscal was 25 per cent less than target. The amount was $6.86 billion less than the previous year. The import expenditure also declined but a lot less than the export earnings. Then by what magic did all these sector-wise disasters not affect the GDP growth? Mr. Finance Minister, will balance the sum please?
And here... It seems that much of the statistical data is unreliable.
As it is, the World Bank and IMF (International Monetary Fund) indirectly accuses all governments of Bangladesh of data doctoring. For long, World Bank, IMF and many other UN organisations do not consider the government-announced GDP growth as reliable. It is general knowledge that local and foreign institutions think other ‘vital statistics’ the BBS publishes are also increased and decreased at will. This doubt is not without basis. There are several instances of such manipulations:
1. The government shows the total population of Bangladesh as less than actual. As a result, the population growth rate has been decreased to 1.3 per cent. According to UNFPA, the rate is 1.42 per cent.
2. The per capita GDP could be increased artificially if the total nominal GDP is deducted by the ‘smaller number of population’. Recently, the government has claimed that per capita income of Bangladesh has risen from $1909 to $2064 on 30 June 2020.
3. The rate of inflation is shown less so that the real per capita GDP could be increased while calculating real GDP from the nominal GDP.
4. The government inflates the literacy rate, which the UNDP does not think credible enough for the Human Development Index.
https://en.prothomalo.com/opinion/op-ed/mr-finance-minister-balance-the-sum-please
Also
Bangladesh began a trend way back to inflate the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate.
en.prothomalo.com
As I said, the data published by your statistics office itself contradicts their very own claim of progress.
Household Income & expenditure survey 2016 (HIES 2016) shows that the average calorie & protein intake decreased in 2016 compared to 10 years prior.
View attachment 770553
Only 5% increase in the number of proper housing (brick- cement) in terms of walls, less than 1% in terms of roofs in 6 years. Is that progress??
View attachment 770555
So are the indicators reported by your statistics office reliable?
The TFR data given by your statistics office is questionable. Just observe the prevalence of teen pregnancy & child marriage in Bangladesh.
Well, I would suggest you improve your
Economic Complexity Index before matching up to South Korea.
Higher economic complexity as compared to country's income level drives economic development. Many low-income countries, including Bangladesh, Venezuela, and Angola have failed to diversify their knowhow and face low growth prospects. Others like India, Turkey, and the Philippines have successfully added productive capabilities to enter new sectors and will drive growth over the coming year
I am laughing my rear off watching single-AD-unit-military country flexing its non-existent ''muscles''.