China's annual export to Bangladesh is worth $15 billion. I think it is high time Bangladesh asks China to relocate its factories to Bangladesh. This way more investment from China can cancel the trade imbalance which is hurting Bangladesh badly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I thought most countries' govts encourage local people to build industries to limit imports. Should BD ask China to build 5,000 companies to build factories here if the number of items we import is 5,000? China may not find it feasible.China's annual export to Bangladesh is worth $15 billion. I think it is high time Bangladesh asks China to relocate its factories to Bangladesh. This way more investment from China can cancel the trade imbalance which is hurting Bangladesh badly.
Chinese will do only what benefits them.China's annual export to Bangladesh is worth $15 billion. I think it is high time Bangladesh asks China to relocate its factories to Bangladesh. This way more investment from China can cancel the trade imbalance which is hurting Bangladesh badly.
Facts have proved that Myanmar, Vietnam, and India are not worthy of Chinese investment. I personally suggest that China increase investment in Bangladesh, and Myanmar is a dangerous country. Myanmar people have relatively low IQs, simple thinking, and easy to be incited. Bangladesh people have a strong motivation to get rich. If they can control the NGO funded by the West, it should be a country worth investing in. The only role of those NGOs is to make the country unable to do anything. Those who participate in NGOs don’t care about the country’s economic development. For them, economic development has nothing to do with their careers, and they also mainly get financial assistance from Western countries. I think that the West's annual performance appraisal for them is to see how many development projects they destroy.
Myanmar is an example. There are a large number of NGOs, and this country looks hopeless.
Agree about Myanmar. The country is resource-rich, but hasn't been stable since world war 2, and has gone from one of the wealthiest in South-east Asia to the poorest. Investors want stability, not coups, civil wars and protests every now and then. Vietnam however is probably in a better position than us. It is neighboring Southern China, so has a geographical advantage, and has a lot of similarities with Bangladesh. Both countries are very homogeneous (85% kinh and 98% Bengali respectively). Bangladesh however has a larger population, which will likely keep wages lower for a longer time than Vietnam, thus making it competitive in that regard. Both countries also enjoy favourable trade agreements with the Chinese market itself. Chinese investors should invest in both countries, depending on the type of industry, and the destination for the products produced.