Balochistan Militants Issue Threat to Chinese President, Pakistan - Report

[SIPRA]

A good response, by figurative emojis, to verbal emojis.

 

[Windjammer]

These Baloch rebels look very professionally trained. Maybe some defects too from the Baloch Regiment

Naxals seem very efficient with their IEDs, may be the Khalistani deserters from Sikh regiment have joined hands with them.

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

These Baloch rebels look very professionally trained. Maybe some defects too from the Baloch Regiment

Trained by best agents of RAW mostly of commander ranks in Indian navy

 

[xyx007]

Indian hand behind BLA is premised on a number of reasons. First, India is openly opposed to the CPEC because India sees this as a challenge to its sovereignty. The CPEC passes through the Gilgit-Baltistan region in Pakistan, which India claims to be a part of the disputed region of Kashmir. India therefore has a motive to see the removal of the CPEC.
Aside from motive, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s 2016 Independence Day speech has also led to believe there is an Indian hand involved in the Balcoh insurgency. In this speech, Modi claimed that Pakistan must be accountable for the atrocities committed in Balochistan, and that India would continue to highlight the Balochistan problem. This was the first time that India acknowledged any Balochistan problem, and while this is not direct evidence, this led many people in Pakistan to see this as indirect evidence for India’s hand in supporting the Baloch insurgency. Not long after, a Pakistani government official accused India of bankrolling the “Free Balochistan” advertisement campaign in Europe and the US.

There have also been multiple reports of individuals in the BLA being supported by India. Following the attacks on the Chinese consulate in Karachi, it was reported that Aslam Baloch, a BLA commander, received medical treatment in India. Other reports describe Baloch insurgents escaping to Europe with Indian help.

In addition, Kulbhushan Jadhav, an Indian spy, was captured in Mashkel, Balochistan On March 3, 2016. After Pakistan Security forces arrested him, Jadhav confessed in a video statement to being an officer of the Indian Navy on a top-secret mission in Balochistan. He also confessed to helping Baloch insurgents carry out terrorist attacks in Pakistan. Pakistani security forces interrogating him alleged that his mission was to disrupt the CPEC by using Baloch insurgents.

India, on the other hand, denied charges of its involvement in the BLA, and has denied that Jadhav was on a sabotage mission in Balochistan. family members told media that he had retired prematurely from the Navy and was now working as a businessman in Iran, where he was abducted. In December 2017, Pakistan allowed Jadhav’s wife and mother to meet him in Islamabad under close supervision.

The admission by India that Jadhav had been in the Indian Navy and his mysterious capture in Balochistan proves that he was definitely not there on a business trip, details of which can’t be ascertained. However, there is insufficient proof to connect Jadhav’s activities directly with efforts to sabotage the CPEC.
India must remember that Balochistan is not Bangladesh, the Pakistani military has moved on since the early 70s.
History shows that Pakistani military establishment does not succumb to Indian threats. Instead, it uses this threat to accumulate more power for itself. India’s direct support to the East Pakistan liberation movement, which resulted in the creation of Bangladesh, did not succeed in changing the perception of Pakistani agencies. It only exacerbated their paranoia towards India further.

It is important to keep in mind that the Balochistan issue is not a straightforward one for India to directly engage in, as was the case with East Pakistan. India does not share a common border with Balochistan and is therefore dependent upon Afghanistan to provide more support to Baloch separatists. This is not as easy as some hawks in India tend to believe, especially as India is struggling to get enough security cover even to protect its own assets in a fast-deteriorating environment in Afghanistan.
When India went to war with Pakistan over Bangladesh in 1971 it had the blanket support of the Soviet Union, one of the two superpowers in the Cold War. If India picks a fight over Balochistan, Pakistan will receive support from China whose $46 billion USD China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) investment in the region is at stake and it is unlikely that any global or regional power will come out openly on India’s side. Both its old friend Russia, and new ally the USA, have tried their best to stay out of the Balochistan imbroglio to date. There is no reason to expect that they will change their stance now.

Provoking Pakistan to an armed conflict now is like playing with fire. If India threatens the territorial integrity of Pakistan as it did in 1971 there is a real possibility of that the pak army and People of Pakistan will retaliate with its prized weapons. You know very well Feb 27 Pakistan Surprise.

 

[B.K.N]

It will have diabolical repercussions for India because as far as China and Pakistan are concerned, this threat is actually being made by Anil Kumar, the chief of R&AW. The response thus will also be projected towards India.

The threat is being made by BLA not RAW

 

[xyx007]

The threat is being made by BLA not RAW

What is difference between BLA and RAW . I think you should start reading in history from 1948 and see the involvement of RAW.
BLA = RAW ..BLA is proxy of RAW.period..

 

[chanikya]

I think pakistan should allow Chinese army into it's territory so that Chinese can protect their interests in pakistan.

 

[B.K.N]

I think pakistan should allow Chinese army into it's territory so that Chinese can protect their interests in pakistan.

Why would Chinese soldiers come to such a dangerous area. Pakistani security is cheapest and safest for Chinese

 

[Areesh]

I think pakistan should allow Chinese army into it's territory so that Chinese can protect their interests in pakistan.

Not needed. Pakistan has enough firepower to crush BL ten times and more

 

[chanikya]

Why would Chinese soldiers come to such a dangerous area. Pakistani security is cheapest and safest for Chinese

Does it mean they can hire them for duties / protection of their assets?

 

[El Sidd]

What is difference between BLA and RAW . I think you should start reading in history from 1948 and see the involvement of RAW.
BLA = RAW ..BLA is proxy of RAW.period..

why don't the Pakistani government provide evidence to the public?

 

[B.K.N]

Not needed. Pakistan has enough firepower to crush BL ten times and more

These attacks started in 2004 but still Pakistani firepower is unable to crush them

Does it mean they can hire them for duties / protection of their assets?

Pakistan army and FC are already providing security to Chinese
If Chinese army comes to Balochistan locals would say now China is occupying there land and there would be even more attacks

 

[Areesh]

These attacks started in 2004 but still Pakistani firepower is unable to crush them

Yeah because no proper action has been taken against these terror factions

Baluchistan needs a proper security plan and its rigorous implementation which hasn't happened till now

 

[suresh1773]

What is difference between BLA and RAW . I think you should start reading in history from 1948 and see the involvement of RAW.
BLA = RAW ..BLA is proxy of RAW.period..

Sorry to burst yr bubble. RAW was formed in 21st September 1968 after the Sino Indian war and not in 1948. Please don't come with frivolous and fallacious arguements

 

[python-000]

Brothers false accounts operates very well all around the world...