What's new

Back off, Britain! China issues furious warning to rivals over plans to deploy warships HMS Queen Elizabeth

There should be a 5 nation QUAD+ carrier FONOP in the Taiwan strait.
 
.
Perfidious Albion 2.0

(1) they call their naval blockade trials "freedom of navigation"

(2) beyond this childish tantrum typical of Anglo children ... in a real case the Second Artillery would sink all those ships

Perfidious Albion 1.0

-in the name of "free trade" we are going to drug your population and do a nice business and make a nice profit
-WTF

(1839, when the queen of england was Pablo Escobar)
 
.
Maybe beg your deeper and higher fraand for help. They claim to have defeated usa many times.
 
.
Quantity us one thing, during the cold war when the Soviet Union is outbuilding everybody, the West counter this with what they called an offset strategy like the development of PGMs, stealth etc which gave them the edge over the warsaw pact. We don't know what will the US offset strategy this time, maybe they're developing some sort of bio weapons to turn enemy soldiers gay. Who knows.

Btw the next decade will be an interesting one, with the introduction of the Japanese super destroyers, Constellation class frigate, type 26s etc. Not to mention the fielding of ship killing hypersonic precision munition by the US and it's allies. The indo Pacific will be even more merrier.

China has both quantity and quality, and will certainly will dominate in term of both in near future.

US may have of weapon in black project development, but do not assume China doesn't have, China has all resources needed for that : money, talents, will, technology.

Forget Japan, she may try to revive but no chance to compete with China in term of research and development for new weapon, she just can play certain degree of catching up to avoid widening gap.
 
.
China has both quantity and quality, and will certainly will dominate in term of both in near future.

US may have of weapon in black project development, but do not assume China doesn't have, China has all resources needed for that : money, talents, will, technology.

Forget Japan, she may try to revive but no chance to compete with China in term of research and development for new weapon, she just can play certain degree of catching up to avoid widening gap.
Even Chinese don't claim to have quality.
See the rush for Tesla cars when China is the biggest producer of evs.
We have seen that the Chinese industry can be crippled in a jiffy by the Americans denying you American technology , as in the case of chips.
Lets keep our feet on the ground.
 
. .
Even Chinese don't claim to have quality.
See the rush for Tesla cars when China is the biggest producer of evs.
We have seen that the Chinese industry can be crippled in a jiffy by the Americans denying you American technology , as in the case of chips.
Lets keep our feet on the ground.


They may not, but western analyst claim so.
Tesla sales majority is due to marketing (image) just like Apple, not because their technology is better.
China is not in the forefront in term of Chip manufacturing technology, but so is US. US can give trouble for Chinese chip manufacturing because of accumulation of past technology.
 
.
They may not, but western analyst claim so.
Tesla sales majority is due to marketing (image) just like Apple, not because their technology is better.
China is not in the forefront in term of Chip manufacturing technology, but so is US. US can give trouble for Chinese chip manufacturing because of accumulation of past technology.
Idiotic reply.
Tesla as a car company is not at the top of quality charts but as a EV company is at the top.
Understand the difference.
It is providing driving range comparable to IC engine cars. And its fast charging network , charges till 80 % in 20 minutes .
Biggest issue is range anxiety in evs. Tesla has tackled that issue quite successfully.
 
.
Idiotic reply.
Tesla as a car company is not at the top of quality charts but as a EV company is at the top.
Understand the difference.
It is providing driving range comparable to IC engine cars. And its fast charging network , charges till 80 % in 20 minutes .
Biggest issue is range anxiety in evs. Tesla has tackled that issue quite successfully.


You are talking about yourself, due to insufficient intelligence ;)

As I said, Tesla is top in EV market because of "image" rather than technology/quality. Tesla is not the best in EV technology.

Can you grasp it?
 
.
The chip manufacturing equipment is manufactured in usa mostly. Thats the reason they are able to leverage that against China. China has not reached the level of tiny Taiwan in using that equipment. Forget about independently manufacturing the equipment.
You are talking about yourself, due to insufficient intelligence ;)

As I said, Tesla is top in EV market because of "image" rather than technology/quality. Tesla is not the best in EV.

Can you grasp it?
I expect high iq reasoning, not just statements from you...
 
.
The chip manufacturing equipment is manufactured in usa mostly. Thats the reason they are able to leverage that against China. China has not reached the level of tiny Taiwan in using that equipment. Forget about independently manufacturing the equipment.

Read again what I am saying above, to avoid repetitive stupid reply.
In term of chip manufacturing US is not ahead of China; intel is stuck with 10nm while China's SMIC is making breakthrough in 7nm.

I expect high iq reasoning, not just statements from you...

You need adequate IQ to understand what I am saying.
 
. .
China has both quantity and quality, and will certainly will dominate in term of both in near future.

US may have of weapon in black project development, but do not assume China doesn't have, China has all resources needed for that : money, talents, will, technology.

Forget Japan, she may try to revive but no chance to compete with China in term of research and development for new weapon, she just can play certain degree of catching up to avoid widening gap.
China has the quantity and quality, while trying to play catch up with fielding 5th gen jets, or even a working ABM systems. Lel. Mind to remind you, China still have no answer to the B2 designed in the 80s

There's no denying of the huge improvement for China in the last decade especially but the US will remain the leading military tech nation on earth, what China do good the US did even better.
 
.
China has the quantity and quality, while trying to play catch up with fielding 5th gen jets, or even a working ABM systems. Lel. Mind to remind you, China still have no answer to the B2 designed in the 80s

There's no denying of the huge improvement for China in the last decade especially but the US will remain the leading military tech nation on earth, what China do good the US did even better.
They layered defense to detect B-2 and as well as their long range UAV has low frequency AESAs to detect Stealth targets
 
.
China has the quantity and quality, while trying to play catch up with fielding 5th gen jets, or even a working ABM systems. Lel. Mind to remind you, China still have no answer to the B2 designed in the 80s

There's no denying of the huge improvement for China in the last decade especially but the US will remain the leading military tech nation on earth, what China do good the US did even better.

You are still trapped in symetric warfare, think assymetric one.
China is ahead in some missile tech, at least same quality in term of radar and sensors, including laser and railgun.
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom