Nope Atmaca > Harpoon.
Is this vehicle made from composite armor ?
Gotcha.
As for datalink, its just enough as long as it supports existing and future TDL standards set by ISSC of STANAG. Wich roughly includes; JTIDS, Link-11/16/22. Currently, TSK already poses these capabilities as obligations. Bro I won't give exact info on Block IIs data-link capabilities but it's likely that Atmaca being a newly developed ASM, will have an upper edge over Block II (RGM-84L) in terms of data-link, more like Block III proposal. The main difference between Block III solution and the RGM-84L is allowing flex-targeting and better accuracy against open-ocean targets since Block II had a little shift onwards littoral targets from her previous base variant.
Flex-targeting is in-flight target updates, positive terminal control and interoperability with data networks under development right now.
I said Block III proposal because this was cancelled at early 2010s when US Navy refused it. Now a Harpoon NG is said to be in development and sources say it will compete against Norwegian NSM on market. (
@Technogaianist might have better info on that)
If I were to put my opinion from the information
@cabatli_53 has shared to us about Atmaca, I believe it'll be more similar to NSM in general, maybe with a range of a little more or less nautical miles.
I don't know the exact range of Atmaca but RGM-84L has a range of 70 nm, close to 75 to be more precise. It naturally seems to have greater range over Harpoon.
