Southern Karabakh is flat. Northern Karabakh is mountainous. When you take into account of topography, northern Karabakh has a lot more area than southern Karabakh. At least several times the area.
Well, I don't know how old you are, but you don't seem to own any land. mountainous and hilly areas can be measured. and are always measured. They measure the base of the hill/mountain. So yes mountains give you more land for your buck, but the cost associated with developing it are greater. ever tried selling a hilly block of land? and then tried selling a flat block you will see what is more expensive. cost of remediating a landslide?
and no, nepal is not bigger than russia just because it has mountains, don't be silly.
Russia saved Armenia. Russia created armenia. There would not be such a country were to not established by russia. But you are right, Armenia and Russia occupy an important part of Azerbaijan in a criminal enterprise. Hopefully Azerbaijan will recover that land with its allies one day.
Russia doesn't even have boots on Azeri regained territories where Turkish forces will be stationed soon not to forget. Whatever Azeribaijan has regained falls directly under Azeri jurisdiction.
Whatever Azeribaijan has gained is within Azeribaijan sovereignity which is approx. 70-75%- The remaining Armenian held territory is where the Russian has taken over. Another defeat for the Armenians.
Now they lost 75% to Azeribaijan and the remaining 25% to Russia.
Good to see you have come to face reality. Your numbers are getting more accurate.
Unfortunately, russian troops are in areas under Azeri control. There are pictures to prove it. They are staying there for a long time.
Russia has ruled out any turkish deployment near the russian front lines in the areas occupied by the russian/armenian forces. They have called such a potential move a "provocation".