What's new

Australia tour of India 2017 - Test Series

16939505_1330220033693834_4050720130708185481_n.jpg


16832107_1328425663873271_1819309085217535230_n.jpg


Simply Whooped them
259856.jpg


Ashwin bowls India to series-levelling win
69058.7.png
The Report by Brydon Coverdale
390 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


India 189 (Rahul 90, Lyon 8-50) and 274 (Pujara 92, Rahane 52, Rahul 51, Hazlewood 6-67) beat Australia 276 (S Marsh 66, Renshaw 60, Jadeja 6-63) and 112 (Ashwin 6-41) by 75 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details









Australia favourites going into the fourth innings?






India have applied a defibrillator to this series, surging to a dramatic victory on the fourth day against Australia in Bengaluru. After the first day of this Test, it was hard to tell what was deader: India's hopes of regaining the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, or any stray blades of grass that somehow remained on the dry pitch. Nathan Lyon had just taken eight wickets, India had been rolled for 189, and Australia had gone to stumps on 40 for 0. But then came three days of Indian fightback.

It all culminated in a thrilling fourth day, which began with a six-wicket haul from Josh Hazlewood as India were bowled out for 274. That gave Australia renewed hope: on a cracking surface with variable bounce, a target of 188 would be tough, but not impossible. And with the score moving quickly, at 42 for 1 Australia were perhaps favourites. The pressure was inescapable: on the batsmen, on the umpires, and on the Indians to live up to their dominant reputation at home.

And then the wickets began to tumble, the DRS played its inevitable role, and by the time R Ashwin had Lyon caught and bowled in the 36th over, India had triumphed by 75 runs. Ashwin finished 6 for 41 and it marked the first time in history that four different bowlers - Lyon, Ashwin, Hazlewood and Ravindra Jadeja - had taken six-wicket hauls in the same Test. It was that sort of match: wickets fell in quick succession and momentum was hard to stop.

In many ways, this result was simply the resumption of normal service. There was a glitch in proceedings in Pune, where Australia ended India's sequence of 20 home Tests without a loss. The malfunction looked like continuing after day one in Bengaluru, but for the remainder of the match India scrapped, wrestled, and fought their way back into the contest. And every time Australia looked like regaining the advantage, India wrested it back.



Full report to follow



At tea on the fourth day in Bengaluru, only one thing was certain: this Test would not be a draw. But a trophy-securing win for Australia? A series-levelling victory for India? A tie? Any of those outcomes seemed plausible. A session full of tension finished with Australia needing 87 runs to retain the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, and their brisk run-rate gave them a chance. But India required only four wickets, and on this pitch, such strikes could come quickly.

Set 188 to win on a dry, cracking surface offering variable bounce, the Australians went to tea on 101 for 6, having just lost Mitchell Marsh and Matthew Wade shortly before the break. Those strikes made India the favourites, though Australia would not have been unhappy at the tea break halting India's momentum. The key man for Australia was Peter Handscomb, the last remaining member of the top six, who had used his feet well and went to tea on 19.

It was a session in which every ball felt like a possible wicket, and in which every run was cheered by the Australians. It was also a session in which Australia's use of the DRS cost them. David Warner was given out early in the session, lbw trying to sweep R Ashwin on 17, and his review was struck down when umpire's call was shown for impact and off stump. The loss of that review almost certainly prevented Shaun Marsh using one five overs later.

Marsh had shouldered arms to Umesh Yadav, who was coming around the wicket, and was given out by umpire Nigel Llong when struck on the pad. Unsure whether he should ask for a review, Marsh consulted his partner, Steven Smith, and the end result was that Marsh walked off. A review would have saved him: it was a poor decision from Llong, the ball clearly going to miss off stump by some distance.

The review system was again in the spotlight soon afterwards when Smith was struck by a grubber from Umesh, and seemed to signal to the Australian dressing room for advice on whether to have the call reviewed. Llong stepped in to prevent the communication, Virat Kohli also objected, and Smith walked off for 28. A review would have been futile: he couldn't have been plumber if he'd been wearing a Super Mario costume.

Mitchell Marsh struck three quick boundaries before he was caught in close off Ashwin for 13, and Wade could not survive until tea, out for a fifth-ball duck when his inside edge lobbed off his pad and up for Wriddhiman Saha to take a diving catch. It left Australia six down, after the session had began with Matt Renshaw edging behind an excellent seamer from Ishant Sharma.

Lunch had marked the innings break after Josh Hazlewood led an excellent bowling display from the visitors and picked up 6 for 67. Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc were both devastating during a new-ball spell that earned Australia five wickets in 19 deliveries, before a last-wicket partnership between Wriddhiman Saha and Ishant Sharma nudged India's lead to 187.

Hazlewood's figures were the best by an Australia fast bowler in a Test innings in India for 37 years, since Geoff Dymock claimed 7 for 67 at Kanpur in October 1979. India started the morning at 213 for 4 and hoped to extend their lead past 200, but the work of Australia's fast bowlers made that a difficult ask, and India were bowled out for 274, having added 61 to their overnight total for the loss of their last six wickets.

Starc started the carnage by swinging the new ball in to Ajinkya Rahane, who on 52 was rapped on the pad and given not out by umpire Llong. However, Smith opted for a review and it was a good one for Australia as the decision was overturned. Next ball, Karun Nair failed to handle Starc's pace and swing and tickled an inside edge onto his stumps, and such was the ferocity of the delivery that the leg stump shattered on impact.

Starc's hat-trick delivery was negotiated by Saha, if not concvincingly then at least effectively, but in the next over Hazlewood picked up an even more important wicket. Cheteshwar Pujara looked set for a century, having resumed on 79, but on 92 he failed to handle a shortish Hazlewood ball that was fended to gully, where Mitchell Marsh took the catch. Three balls later, R Ashwin was bowled by one that stayed low, and Hazlewood had two in the over.

In Hazlewood's next over he accounted for Umesh, who swung hard and was caught at mid-off, and it looked as tough Australia might run through the tail quickly. But Ishant and Saha hung in for a 16-run tenth-wicket stand that could yet prove crucial, and which ended when Ishant drove a catch to cover off the spin of Steve O'Keefe.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. @brydoncoverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
 
. .
Excellent come back by the Indians in there 2nd Innings batting. For me that is where they won the match.

Congratulations and well played. The series is kept alive and will look forward to more entertaining cricket. I just hope that somehow BCCI decides to make similar kind of wickets in the next two matches as well rather that those dull slow tracks. These are the ones that make Test cricket exciting!!
 
.
What a match!
no wonder Indo Aussie test rivalry is one of the most anticipated contest right now.
Hope to see similar excitement in next 2 matches as well.
 
.
Simply Whooped them
259856.jpg


Ashwin bowls India to series-levelling win
69058.7.png
The Report by Brydon Coverdale
390 Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


India 189 (Rahul 90, Lyon 8-50) and 274 (Pujara 92, Rahane 52, Rahul 51, Hazlewood 6-67) beat Australia 276 (S Marsh 66, Renshaw 60, Jadeja 6-63) and 112 (Ashwin 6-41) by 75 runs
Scorecard and ball-by-ball details









Australia favourites going into the fourth innings?






India have applied a defibrillator to this series, surging to a dramatic victory on the fourth day against Australia in Bengaluru. After the first day of this Test, it was hard to tell what was deader: India's hopes of regaining the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, or any stray blades of grass that somehow remained on the dry pitch. Nathan Lyon had just taken eight wickets, India had been rolled for 189, and Australia had gone to stumps on 40 for 0. But then came three days of Indian fightback.

It all culminated in a thrilling fourth day, which began with a six-wicket haul from Josh Hazlewood as India were bowled out for 274. That gave Australia renewed hope: on a cracking surface with variable bounce, a target of 188 would be tough, but not impossible. And with the score moving quickly, at 42 for 1 Australia were perhaps favourites. The pressure was inescapable: on the batsmen, on the umpires, and on the Indians to live up to their dominant reputation at home.

And then the wickets began to tumble, the DRS played its inevitable role, and by the time R Ashwin had Lyon caught and bowled in the 36th over, India had triumphed by 75 runs. Ashwin finished 6 for 41 and it marked the first time in history that four different bowlers - Lyon, Ashwin, Hazlewood and Ravindra Jadeja - had taken six-wicket hauls in the same Test. It was that sort of match: wickets fell in quick succession and momentum was hard to stop.

In many ways, this result was simply the resumption of normal service. There was a glitch in proceedings in Pune, where Australia ended India's sequence of 20 home Tests without a loss. The malfunction looked like continuing after day one in Bengaluru, but for the remainder of the match India scrapped, wrestled, and fought their way back into the contest. And every time Australia looked like regaining the advantage, India wrested it back.



Full report to follow



At tea on the fourth day in Bengaluru, only one thing was certain: this Test would not be a draw. But a trophy-securing win for Australia? A series-levelling victory for India? A tie? Any of those outcomes seemed plausible. A session full of tension finished with Australia needing 87 runs to retain the Border-Gavaskar Trophy, and their brisk run-rate gave them a chance. But India required only four wickets, and on this pitch, such strikes could come quickly.

Set 188 to win on a dry, cracking surface offering variable bounce, the Australians went to tea on 101 for 6, having just lost Mitchell Marsh and Matthew Wade shortly before the break. Those strikes made India the favourites, though Australia would not have been unhappy at the tea break halting India's momentum. The key man for Australia was Peter Handscomb, the last remaining member of the top six, who had used his feet well and went to tea on 19.

It was a session in which every ball felt like a possible wicket, and in which every run was cheered by the Australians. It was also a session in which Australia's use of the DRS cost them. David Warner was given out early in the session, lbw trying to sweep R Ashwin on 17, and his review was struck down when umpire's call was shown for impact and off stump. The loss of that review almost certainly prevented Shaun Marsh using one five overs later.

Marsh had shouldered arms to Umesh Yadav, who was coming around the wicket, and was given out by umpire Nigel Llong when struck on the pad. Unsure whether he should ask for a review, Marsh consulted his partner, Steven Smith, and the end result was that Marsh walked off. A review would have saved him: it was a poor decision from Llong, the ball clearly going to miss off stump by some distance.

The review system was again in the spotlight soon afterwards when Smith was struck by a grubber from Umesh, and seemed to signal to the Australian dressing room for advice on whether to have the call reviewed. Llong stepped in to prevent the communication, Virat Kohli also objected, and Smith walked off for 28. A review would have been futile: he couldn't have been plumber if he'd been wearing a Super Mario costume.

Mitchell Marsh struck three quick boundaries before he was caught in close off Ashwin for 13, and Wade could not survive until tea, out for a fifth-ball duck when his inside edge lobbed off his pad and up for Wriddhiman Saha to take a diving catch. It left Australia six down, after the session had began with Matt Renshaw edging behind an excellent seamer from Ishant Sharma.

Lunch had marked the innings break after Josh Hazlewood led an excellent bowling display from the visitors and picked up 6 for 67. Hazlewood and Mitchell Starc were both devastating during a new-ball spell that earned Australia five wickets in 19 deliveries, before a last-wicket partnership between Wriddhiman Saha and Ishant Sharma nudged India's lead to 187.

Hazlewood's figures were the best by an Australia fast bowler in a Test innings in India for 37 years, since Geoff Dymock claimed 7 for 67 at Kanpur in October 1979. India started the morning at 213 for 4 and hoped to extend their lead past 200, but the work of Australia's fast bowlers made that a difficult ask, and India were bowled out for 274, having added 61 to their overnight total for the loss of their last six wickets.

Starc started the carnage by swinging the new ball in to Ajinkya Rahane, who on 52 was rapped on the pad and given not out by umpire Llong. However, Smith opted for a review and it was a good one for Australia as the decision was overturned. Next ball, Karun Nair failed to handle Starc's pace and swing and tickled an inside edge onto his stumps, and such was the ferocity of the delivery that the leg stump shattered on impact.

Starc's hat-trick delivery was negotiated by Saha, if not concvincingly then at least effectively, but in the next over Hazlewood picked up an even more important wicket. Cheteshwar Pujara looked set for a century, having resumed on 79, but on 92 he failed to handle a shortish Hazlewood ball that was fended to gully, where Mitchell Marsh took the catch. Three balls later, R Ashwin was bowled by one that stayed low, and Hazlewood had two in the over.

In Hazlewood's next over he accounted for Umesh, who swung hard and was caught at mid-off, and it looked as tough Australia might run through the tail quickly. But Ishant and Saha hung in for a 16-run tenth-wicket stand that could yet prove crucial, and which ended when Ishant drove a catch to cover off the spin of Steve O'Keefe.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. @brydoncoverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.
so whoever win the toss win the match on such difficult pitches

Austrlia is showing good fight on foreign soil as matches are close
 
. .
Historically matches in bangalore has been won by opposition. Australia got thrashed by sri lanka, it is actually bit surprising that they went 1-0 up.
Australia actually have better record outside Austrlia as compare to asian team performance outside asia..
 
. . .
Something about India brings out the best (and ugliest) in them.

Regardless of the tempers, it's probably the marquee clash of Test cricket over the past 15+ years now.
Dont forget the Ashes!
It is surely the marquee clash for India.

But nonetheless, India vs Aus are a treat to watch (Test Cricket) indeed.
 
.
Dont forget the Ashes!
It is surely the marquee clash for India.

But nonetheless, India vs Aus are a treat to watch (Test Cricket) indeed.

Definitely. I do not deny the traditional "needle" in that contest. Sadly India v Pakistan is no longer there.

And yes, its definitely THE marquee match up for India. Maybe 5-10 years ago, I would have agreed that the western countries enjoyed the cricket these clashes produced, but still rated the Ashes higher. But off late, I am seeing that change.

Yesterday, a very respected Australian (or British?) journalist tweeted about this being THE marquee clash of the Test world. And that the test match showed exactly why. I've traveled to Australia increasingly over the past 2-3 years and seen many goras feel the same. They've always respected our team and looked forward to the matches. But now they openly say its who they want to beat most. And I've seen that since before we consistently became the No. 1 Test team.

This might be anecdotal, but there is a family friend of ours who is cricket crazy and from South Africa. Gora. A very senior professor. He loves the Australia -South Africa one day epics. But readily agrees that we have a phenomenal team now ("your captain is REALLY good!") and that the India Australia series is the true Test championship clash. Of course he still maintains that AB is the best batsman in the world ... lol
 
Last edited:
. .
India vs Aus are a treat to watch (Test Cricket) indeed
The best thing about such matches is the amount of spectators they bring in stadium. yesterday, it was almost a full house even though it was a working day.
Just the kind of shot Test cricket requires.

What was Steve Smith thinking?
:p:
As he himself admitted later, it was a moment of brain fade.
Richie Benaud once said during commentary that it is pressure situation that tells you true character of a captain (& players in general). Yesterday Steve knew his wicket was vital and in that situation he almost lost all confidence on his brain (he was in best position to know where ball had hit him) and should've gone for review. but he blanked out (not to mention Handscombe) and took that silly desperate step of looking at dressing room. good thing umpires intervened in time.
PS: with events like above and even Virat showing signs of frustration at times, i personally admire Dhoni even more. In his years of cricket, he was extremely cool and kept absorbing pressure like Super Sopper.
I wish Virat learn that aspect of captaincy from him, while Dhoni is still around in LOI cricket.

AB is the best batsman in the world
I think he is but in ODI/T20s. but certainly not in Test arena!

Australia actually have better record outside Austrlia as compare to asian team performance outside asia..
Probably owing to their better bowling attack (Good quality Pace and Spin bowlers). However i still feel their batsman aren't good at against quality spin on sub-continental tracks.
 
.
Looking forward to Ranchi ...

Many (most) people attribute new Indian aggression to the fountainhead of shirt waving Dada.

I personally feel it was Gavaskar ...
 
. .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom