What's new

Australia ruling party endorses gay marriage

So says the "evil" Australian who is probably corrupted by seeing so many attractive bodies on the beach. The middle east is the last bastion of pure, unadulterated morality which is why banning women from driving (as in SA) is essential to protect virginity (what's that, you ask?). They will never give in to "modernity" which is in any case a Jewish conspiracy to corrupt the purest of the pure.

Fat chance of change !

Be careful, some pakistani people might actually take your sarcasem seriously :P

It's not about being on any "side", it is simply about opinions.

In principle I feel that people should have the same rights regardless of what attributes they were born with.

If someone from Communist China can see the light, hopefully people from the middle east will soon too.
 
.
I don't know what's wrong with you? What I said wasn't that hard to understand? Maybe if you try reading again it again?
Get back to me then.

Why are you asking me this absurd question? what does it even have to do with the topic? Is that hard to understand?
 
.
here's my comments about homosexuality and disease, crime, drug use, domestic violence and low IQ being linked.

There is a far stronger correlation between having black skin and disease, crime, drug use, domestic violence and low IQ. Does that mean we kill all black people?

Who even mentioned killing anyone?
 
. .
.
So says the "evil" Australian who is probably corrupted by seeing so many attractive bodies on the beach. The middle east is the last bastion of pure, unadulterated morality which is why banning women from driving (as in SA) is essential to protect virginity (what's that, you ask?). They will never give in to "modernity" which is in any case a Jewish conspiracy to corrupt the purest of the pure.

Fat chance of change !

You might want to take all of this BS you just posted and shove up where the sun don't shine. Last i checked, the so called extremists governments are supported by western countries, the same western countries who then use the excuse of these extremists governments to ridicule Muslims and people of middle east for being "backwards", yeah backwards my @$$, as if the west even wants to see Muslims stand up on their own.


Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links - Telegraph

Libyan War: The Truth -- US Supporting al Qaeda Insurgents Against the Will of the Libyan People


Why is the United States Helping Al Qaeda in Libya? | UNCOVERAGE.net

More links below:
Libya: the West and al-Qaeda on the same side - Telegraph

» U.S. Government Backs Libyan Al-Qaeda While Hyping Terror Attacks Inside U.S. Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Al Qaida commander backs Libyan rebels in message

Truth Revealed: Al Qaeda Part Of Libyan Rebels, U.S. Helping Fighters Who Killed Americans In Iraq! at Pat Dollard

And one more thing bharati, do i need to bring up the modernity and progressiveness of your country? So called future economic super power, worlds biggest democracy!
 
.
For most Muslims I speak to, being gay is not natural because Allah didn't mention these creatures (their words) in the Quran. True story. I didn't say anything back to offend them.

For most Muslim countries, Change is bad. They just want to live in 6th century, that's all.
 
.
here's my comments about homosexuality and disease, crime, drug use, domestic violence and low IQ being linked.

There is a far stronger correlation between having black skin and disease, crime, drug use, domestic violence and low IQ. Does that mean we kill all black people?

See how ridiculous this argument sounds?

First of all, no one mentioned killing anyone, secondly,the argument is whether or not homosexuality is normal, natural, its negative impact on the individual and society, in comparison with heterosexuality, since people here rely on logic, so called liberals. But now all of a sudden someone brings up this correlation causation in order to screen the negativity of homosexuality, if we base everything on "correlation does not imply causation" theory, but is this supposed to hide the fact that homo's are more prone to STD's due to their sexual behavior? Is "correlation does not imply causation" going to change the ground reality that homosexuals and pedophiles have a strong connection. Or that newer strains of HIV/AID's is being discovered in homo's?

No!
 
.
....The only thing you did was post a wiki link (not reliable, in fact, its considered a joke)...
This is surely one way to win an argument.....by denying all the proofs and facts, the opponent is giving and regarding only your proof as the most authentic.............BUT this is not the logical way.

You have problem with WIKI....you call it a joke....but you didn't understand on what pretext I used it.
(I would be grateful if you can provide me with a source which directly opposes what WIKI says in this context)

Regarding authenticity......tell me where does WIKI get its information from????....Does it have its own research team????

People all over the world are updating WIKI with the latest information....and these people in turn get their information directly from the source or from sources which YOU think are reliable.
The fact that so many people are adding information to WIKI...proves its authenticity and neutrality.
Imagine , if one person adds anything wrong or out of context, then immediately it will catch the attention of someone or the other somewhere in the world keeping a vigilant eye.....so there is practically no room for mistakes or fake news.

....the link for the other source you provided only summarized what some old studies from 1960's-1980's...

Again, If you had read my sources and arguments carefully..... you wouldn't have made the above statement.

The links I provided are actually very comprehensive.....they first summarized old studies from 1960's-80's and then refuted their claims with the help of more advanced and modern studies.

Thus, you just proved my claim, that you are replying just for the sake of it....without reading completely what i provided.
(just giving screen shots, doesn't prove that you are reading it all...... after-all it is easier than reading everything)

So, my suggestion is....read carefully and completely(not just the first few lines) what we are providing in support of our arguments.....unless you do this , you will never realize where you are wrong.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom