ChinaToday
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2011
- Messages
- 4,557
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
When a copy cat can be in top position, why cant we
Cos you not even capable to copy that is why
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When a copy cat can be in top position, why cant we
Cos you not even capable to copy that is why
So does Afghans need it for the same reasons... and stealing is never fair.
10 years of stealing!! i think enough is enough and their shall be audit of every activity being carried out in Afghanistan by foreigners.
^^^ Haha I knew you were bluffing about putting me on your ignore list.
Rudd firm on India uranium ban
Rudd firm on India uranium ban
THE Foreign Minister, Kevin Rudd, and the Resources Minister, Martin Ferguson, say the ALP is free to debate a policy change to allow uranium exports to India but Mr Rudd remains opposed, saying India does not need any more of the mineral.
Indian officials and business are lobbying behind the scenes at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Perth for the government to change its policy and allow uranium exports.
The Coalition supports exporting uranium to India and it is believed the topic was raised when the Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott, also in Perth, met yesterday with the Indian Vice-President, Hamid Ansari.
But Labor opposes selling uranium to any nation such as India, which is not a signatory to the nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
Speaking after a mining industry breakfast yesterday, Mr Rudd said India did not even need Australian uranium.
''Work out where India currently sources its uranium from around the world,'' he said.
''There is no problem in terms of global supply, let's just be very, very blunt about this.
''If you hear an argument from an Indian businessperson that the future of the nuclear industry in India depends exclusively on access to uranium, that is simply not sustainable as a proposition. Have a look at the data.''
Mr Ferguson, who does support selling uranium to India, said he was not proposing himself to move at the national conference for a policy change but he would eagerly join a debate if someone else did.
He stressed that, regardless of the policy, ''we've got a very strong relationship with India''.
Mr Ferguson revealed there were discussions in progress for a large investment in the Galilee coal basin in Queensland.
''Indian investors will be the key to the huge export opportunity for Australia,'' he said.
''The relationship with Australia is exceptionally good.''
Australian Media is not the one calling the shot :
And who said they were? You need to understand the concept of lobbying mate!
So does Afghans need it for the same reasons... and stealing is never fair.
10 years of stealing!! i think enough is enough and their shall be audit of every activity being carried out in Afghanistan by foreigners.
NO Signing of NPT = No talk of Uranium Sale to India. No matter how much you spend on lobbying.
Its high time India should say thanks but no thanks to Australia regarding uranium sale , Thanks .
NO Signing of NPT = No talk of Uranium Sale to India. No matter how much you spend on lobbying.
The United States is selling nuclear technology, Canada is selling uranium, clearly our two close allies and friends in Canada and the United States believe that India can be trusted. It has an exemplary record in nuclear non-proliferation and it will be Coalition policy to sell uranium to India.
"India, the emerging third-biggest economy in the world"??
Have all Indian media outlets turned into the ToI?
Maybe wait until you get into the top five largest economies first, or surpass Brazil.
Or Labor Party gets voted out in 2013, and India gets uranium
Tony Abbott Doorstop - The Coalition
The United States is selling nuclear technology, Canada is selling uranium, clearly our two close allies and friends in Canada and the United States believe that India can be trusted. It has an exemplary record in nuclear non-proliferation and it will be Coalition policy to sell uranium to India.
How Indian thieves stole nuclear technoloy from Canada/US
How Indian thieves stole nuclear technoloy from Canada/US - Mombu the Culture Forum
Candu: The Canadian Nuclear Reactor | CBC Archives
An uninvited guest has joined the nuclear club, and fingers are
pointing at Canada. On May 18th 1974, India detonates a 12-kiloton
nuclear explosive in the Rajasthan desert. It was built using
plutonium from a research reactor donated by Canada in 1956. The
explosion prompts fierce criticism of Canada's nuclear exports, and a
wall of excuses from officials in both Canada and India. Canadian
officials say they couldn't stop it. India denies it was even a bomb.
The nuclear device was built using plutonium obtained from the
40-megawatt Cirus research reactor, a gift from Canada. It was donated
under the Commonweath "Colombo Plan" aid program, which sought to
promote economic and social development in South and Southeast Asia.
The gift helped pave the way for future reactor sales: Canada sold
India two Candu reactors (in 1963 and 1966), and they now have a
number of Candu clones.
The Cirus reactor (which was not a Candu) was modeled on the Chalk
River NRX reactor. It was donated on the condition that it only be
used for peaceful purposes – so India claimed their 1974 explosion was
"peaceful" and would help them in industries such as mining.
India referred to the device as the "Peaceful Nuclear Explosive" or
PNE. It was also called "Smiling Buddha."
India can be trusted by USA and Canada ? Do you have any idea what you are talking about ?
See below :