Atul Kochhar losing his job for expressing opinion is bad enough, naked triumphalism of liberals far

[hunter_hunted]

damn i thought camera was invent in 20th century.

Thats a vedic camera model is Baniya1000

 

[Areesh]

Need I say more ?

Nope

Just STFU and don't rant about Islam on a Pakistani forum. This is not a RSS kanjarkhana after all

 

[pothead]

Very original pic taken by a HD camera..

Don't go down that route dear muslim.
If we apply the same parity to your beliefs, you would be hoping mad.

Nope

Just STFU and don't rant about Islam on a Pakistani forum. This is not a RSS kanjarkhana after all

Or what?
ban us? Go ahead?

This is not about Islam.

This is about Invaders who used Islam as an excuse to commit the biggest genocide in human history & more galling turn around and say 'SO WHAT?'

 

[Areesh]

Or what?
ban us? Go ahead?

This is not about Islam.

This is about Invaders who used Islam as an excuse to commit the biggest genocide in human history & more galling turn around and say 'SO WHAT?'

I hope that genocide would be committed again. Humanity needs it.

Now eff off.

 

[pothead]

I hope that genocide would be committed again. Humanity needs it.

Now eff off.

It will happen in reverse, don't you worry your pretty face about it.
Already Austria is on with the program, rest of the world will soon follow.

 

[Areesh]

It will happen in reverse, don't you worry your pretty face about it.
Already Austria is on with the program, rest of the world will soon follow.

Austria is nobody. And so are you and your lot

So keep dreaming till the inevitable hits you on your as$.

 

[pothead]

Austria is nobody. And so are you and your lot

So keep dreaming till the inevitable hits you on your as$.

Is that what's happening now?
We all know how China treats your Umma brothers. Oh, they even have Chinese flags on your mosques in China.

Still, you weak sauce clowns are sucking up the country that's really showing your ilk it's true aukath.
Bloody bunch of impotent..

 

[Safriz]

Express opinion about stupid animal cow in India and get killed

 

[pothead]

Express opinion about stupid animal cow in India and get killed

This was a calf, throat cut and head paraded in India.
Nothing happened to them even after video was out.

Only time they are killed when these clowns try to steal cattle and try to get away.
If you think to eat beef we should let these vermin steal cattle, you got only bullets going their way.

 

[Areesh]

Is that what's happening now?
We all know how China treats your Umma brothers. Oh, they even have Chinese flags on your mosques in China.

Still, you weak sauce clowns are sucking up the country that's really showing your ilk it's true aukath.
Bloody bunch of impotent..

These are all futile efforts of resistance before sh!t hits the roof.

By the way it is funny you are calling others impotence who for centuries have remain in slavery and are going towards a sure doom.

 

[Jackdaws]

Liberals in India are pseudo liberals. Most are just as intolerant. True liberals are few and far between. What the chef said is daft and politically incorrect. But it should be protected under free speech. Also, he lives in London not UAE.

 

[fitpOsitive]

The approach to covert India into a Hindu Rashtra will lead India towards further division. Change your approach. Love should be the main theme, rather than hate, as Islam did many centuries ago.

 

[khanmubashir]

https://www.firstpost.com/india/atu...iumphalism-of-liberals-far-worse-4511291.html

The Atul Kochhar incident leaves the taste of ash in the mouth. That someone's livelihood can be snatched away at the blink of an eye for expressing an opinion (for which he subsequently expressed remorse) is bad enough. It is worse to see Indian liberals, the so-called defenders of free speech, celebrate the Michelin-starred chef's sacking and the stifling of his voice with all triumphalism at their command.


File image of Atul Kochhar. Image courtesy: @atulkochhar

It is a brutal statement of intent and a blatant expression of hypocrisy. The intent is simple: To bully nonconformist voices into submission and set an example before others so that those with opposing views are either silenced or fall in line. The idea is to trigger self-censorship by inducing fear so that ideological domination becomes simpler.

These coercive methods are not really uncommon. Human history is essentially a violent treatise of the tension between subjugation and liberty. As a marker of human ideological evolution, the higher ideal of liberalism strives to set us free from such prejudices and discriminatory practices.

The colossal betrayal lies in the fact that its self-appointed practitioners — instead of standing against precisely the fate that befell Kochhar — celebrated his plight with gay abandon. It was doubly hypocritical to see liberals employ every trick in the totalitarian playbook to bully Kochhar and then claim to have done so in the name of liberalism. It is difficult to find a more perverted moral crime.

It seems clear by now that liberalism has fallen prey to its inherent contradictions and its self-proclaimed practitioners are no better than illiberals. In fact, liberal intolerance is more toxic precisely because it is deceptive.

As Mark Brandt, an American-trained psychologist at Tilburg University in the Netherlands found in a 2013 paper (co-authored by Geoffrey Wetherell and Christine Reyna in Social Psychological and Personality Science), "While liberals might like to think of themselves as more open-minded, they are no more tolerant of people unlike them than their conservative counterparts are", despite the fact that they "have a variety of personality traits and moral values that should protect them from expressing prejudice."

The Kochhar episode reinforces many home truths, especially one that pertains to India. Having won the culture war, the liberals and Leftists are more desperate than ever to retain control over the avenues of soft power because they are mortified at losing political power. This is exemplified by the way a liberal lynch mob co-ordinated its attack on Kochhar, ensured his harm and felt satisfied at the turn of events. These nasty attacks are likely to recur.

The problem with liberalism lies deeper than its fake practitioners. Liberalism as an ideology has fundamentally failed to come to terms with Islamism. Instead of tackling the problem, it tiptoed past or remained deliberately oblivious to the challenge Islamism poses to its basic tenets. This problem has been allowed to fester for so long that now liberalism must take recourse to double standards to explain many contradictions that it espouses.

For instance, while denigration of Hindu gods and goddesses (or poking fun at the Pope) is insured under liberalism, similar liberties with Islam are disallowed. This hypocrisy has been internalised by liberals in such a way that now they are either unable to detect it, or forced to take a conciliatory approach out of fear.

The Kochhar incident is a stunning indictment of this hypocrisy. The London-based chef, who had a contract with JW Marriott Marquis hotel in Dubai that housed his Rang Mahal restaurant, was reacting to the Quantico controversy involving Priyanka Chopra in his 10 June tweet which he has since deleted:

“It’s sad to see that you [Chopra] have not respected the sentiments of Hindus who have been terrorised by Islam over 2,000 years. Shame on you.”


Kochhar may have been inaccurate with his dates but his larger point is a documented, historical truth.

Columnist Tavleen Singh tweeted:

The brutalities of Islamic invasion cannot be denied or wished away. As VS Naipaul told Tarun Tejpal in a 1999 interview in Outlook, "In art books and history books, people write of the Muslims "arriving" in India, as though the Muslims came on a tourist bus and went away again. The Muslim view of their conquest of India is a truer one. They speak of the triumph of the faith, the destruction of idols and temples, the loot, the carting away of the local people as slaves, so cheap and numerous that they were being sold for a few rupees." Sir Vidia also held forth on the destruction of temples which is evident from both their presence and absence. "The architectural evidence: The absence of Hindu monuments in the north is convincing enough. This conquest was unlike any other that had gone before. There are no Hindu records of this period. Defeated people never write their history. The victors write the history. The victors were Muslims. For people on the other side, it is a period of darkness." In The Diplomat, Akhilesh Pillalamarri wrote how this destruction was carried out to send a message of humiliation. "Today, most of the large and important historical Hindu temples are found in southern India (Tirupati, Madurai) or in Odisha, on the eastern coast. These areas remained outside of Islamic rule for most of their history. The traditional heartland of Hinduism in the Ganges river valley (modern Uttar Pradesh and Bihar) as well as Punjab and Sindh feature no major large Hindu temples, most of which were destroyed by Muslim iconoclasm, much of which occurred in the period of the initial Muslim conquest of the region from 1000-1300 C.E. As many historians like to point out, many, if not most, Hindu temples were not destroyed, but major ones were, primarily to make an impact on Hindus." It is also important to note that for stating a historical fact, Kochhar issued two "sincere, unqualified" apologies:


The Kochhar incident sparked a counter-reaction on social media where some from the right-wing have called for a boycott of JW Marriott chain of hotels. This is a silly position to take. Marriott is duty-bound to obey strict Islamic laws of the UAE if it wants to conduct its business. It is unreasonable to expect the luxury brand to keep Kochhar on at the risk of hurting its business. It has taken a decision which became inevitable as the controversy grew.

The question to ask is why liberals hounded Kochhar in such a way that leaves the chef facing "imprisonment of up to five years and a fine of between 500,000 dirhams and 1 million dirhams"?

This is not merely hypocrisy at work, but Islamic exceptionalism that forces liberals to concede that Islam and Muslims should be kept outside the purview of liberalism. This, of course, is a deeply unprincipled and perverted position to take but as Jeffrey Tayler wrote in Quilette, these liberals are "not genuine progressives at all… but deeply confused de facto apologists for the most illiberal notion conceivable: Namely, that one group of humans has, on account of its religion, an inalienable right to dominate and abuse other humans: And to do so unmolested by criticism."

It is here that the can hits the road. In order to justify their illiberalism, liberals performed the old trick of labelling Kochhar's words as "hate speech" and called for punishment against "bigotry". This purportedly frees them from carrying the can of liberalism and they may go about their task of bullying those they do not approve of.

This fake liberalism similarly prevents them from standing in favour of the AMU students who were hounded (and received death threats) for visiting a bar during the month of Ramzan. The Kochhar incident shouldn't surprise us. The only lesson to take from it is this: Liberalism is dead. RIP.

Ah one bigot.crying.on the treatment of fellow bigot For.him being too stupid to hide his hateful bigotry and keep.his private dark thoughts to himself

A character both of.these. bigots share

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

Is that what's happening now?
We all know how China treats your Umma brothers. Oh, they even have Chinese flags on your mosques in China.

Still, you weak sauce clowns are sucking up the country that's really showing your ilk it's true aukath.
Bloody bunch of impotent..

A)Gandu you treat your own Muslims like shyt... and I’m not even talking about Dalits ... yet you have the balls to point fingers!

And what has China gotta do with us?

Bawli gaand.

These are all futile efforts of resistance before sh!t hits the roof.

By the way it is funny you are calling others impotence who for centuries have remain in slavery and are going towards a sure doom.

He calls people impotent because that’s what his kind is.... and that natural trait doesn’t go away that easy...

And than he’s a pothead... delusional.

 

[khanmubashir]

If you lot had you way, every speech would be hate speech.
In fact Hindus existing in this world would amount to hate speech for you.

What's worse is even after killing millions of Hindus, people have the gall to justify the genocide and shut our mouths by making facts as hate speech.

If you want hate speech, you should go to Indian mosques on a Friday and listen to their "sermons".



It's the liberals who got the Chef fired.
This article is targeting the same liberals who profuse free speech when Hindu gods are abused only to turn around and butcher Free speech when Islam is questioned.

Wonder how stating historical facts is a hate speech.

It's like Nazis taking issue with Jews stating historical facts about Holocaust.



It's the liberals who got the Chef fired.
This article is targeting the same liberals who profuse free speech when Hindu gods are abused only to turn around and butcher Free speech when Islam is questioned.

Wonder how stating historical facts is a hate speech.

It's like Nazis taking issue with Jews stating historical facts about Holocaust.

If you want hate speech, you should go to Indian mosques on a Friday and listen to their "sermons".

U visit alot of mosuques kiddo ????

R u feeling a void not satisfied by your own relgion or to steel shoes