mike2000 is back
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 8,513
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
Lool OK if you say so .That's right Einstein. The fake as hell A-raab Spring was conceived at Langley
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lool OK if you say so .That's right Einstein. The fake as hell A-raab Spring was conceived at Langley
Baath junta seized power on 8 March 1963, as result of military coup. Frenches have nothing to do with it.Well, you are right to some extent. However, you can't blame the Syrian Baathist regime that much. Since they were put into power by the French government . They merely inherited and built on this power structure to this day. So France is also to be blamed to a lesser extent
That's because of the saudi Qatari turkish western backed terrorist who used the cities and towns as battlefieldYour regime committed the biggest ethnic cleansing and slaughter of Muslims in entire history:
Salman.. the war is not finished yet. They will do crazy things, they will pump oil money in their new tactics because they invested too much in supporting the terrorists, so they will not easily give up. ISIS is not beaten completely and extremist rebels still have some areas under their control. There is no victory until their complete defeat which I hope follows fast.There is something weard in this thread the Anglo Saxon pigs with Zionists scum and Wahhabi dogs are supposed to be enemies but in this thread they have commen enemy which is the secular Assad government and they are openly mad because terrorists scum lost that's says and explain everything!
I do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easilySalman.. the war is not finished yet. They will do crazy things, they will pump oil money in their new tactics because they invested too much in supporting the terrorists, so they will not easily give up. ISIS is not beaten completely and extremist rebels still have some areas under their control. There is no victory until their complete defeat which I hope follows fast.
I do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easily
Dude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lolI do agree with you zio Wahhabi Anglo Saxon american terrorist alliance will not give up easily
I know this but why you are going to war with Assad when this will make you look like aggressive invaders and the reason that you didn't overthrow the Assad regime because you want Syria and Syrians to destroy each other in long conflict without losing a single soldier because we know who benefits from Syria destructionDude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lol
New Recruit
Only a Fool will say a man who destroyed his whole country and set it back by 30 years "won" anything. All this because of his greed for power. No man should be above a country, neither should ANY MAN rule a country for life (especially when the citizens are not even living a wealthy life like they should). We are mere mortals. Humans come and go but the country always remains. So why destroy your country just because of your greed for power? Should have left like Mubarak, Ben Ali etc did. Life continues,not the end of the world. Now look at Syria, the country WILL NEVER BE THE SAME AGAIN. Half its population(including the young/educated ones) have all migrated/seek refuge overseas and there is too much bad blood between Syrians today, all because of one single man. That's even considering he will ever fully control Syria again(which I don't think it's possible, even with Russian/Iranian, Hezbollah, all foriegn Shia fighters from the region etc).
So any talk of victory is laughable to be honest. There would never have been one if he handled things correctly and stepped down like any honourable leader that loves his country would have done instead of killing his own people for daring to rise up against him.
I just feel sorry for common Syrian people who will never have their country back again.
Dude, if we REALLY wanted Assad gone we would have intervened long ago and toppled him in a matter of weeks at most. lol He is not any stronger than Saddam or Qaddafi. The fact that he remained in power was due to the reticence of western powers to get into another conflict, the unpredictable outcome of what will happen after he is removed and other political reasons. It was never because Assad(or the resistance or whatever it's called) was too strong. lol
LOL yes I already heard that line before: "Arabs citizens who rose up against their tyrants was all a U.S Zionist conspiracy. " Arabs don't have brains, they are merely puppets according to some.It was not only about stepping down. The only reason this war happened is because of Israel and USA. The zionists want to remove any group / party / country that is a threat to Israel. The biggest threat to Israel is actually Iran.. However, a direct attack from Israel on Iran would be suicide, since Israel is surrounded by Iranian allies.. Islamic Jihad and Hamas (Gaza), Hezbollah (Lebanon) and Assad (Syria).. These threats (Iranian allies) have to be removed from the table before Israel and USA can move on to take out the Iranian threat. The biggest problems of these threats is Syria ofcourse, because it is a country, not a group like Hezbollah and Hamas.. A direct attack from Israel on Syria would have resulted in a substantial long lasting war and a lot of casualties for the Israelis (not fighting a group but a country).. So they played it smart. Mossad and CIA tickled the starting of an uprising, forged ISIS out of the rebels and let their proxy fighters fight the war for them.
The Israeli/USA plan has succeeded partially.. They succeeded in destroying Syria.. BUT they could not predict the Russian move. The Russians intervened, because its in their interests to stop the growing dominance of USA.. Remember the Russians have a military base in Syria and its the only way to hold a position in the middle east. Simultaneously the Israeli/USA plan was thwarted, because Assad is still on the throne in Syria. Iran stil has Syria as its ally and on the contrary actually increased their influence. (Israel/USA hoped to diminish Iranian influence).
Israel already tried to remove the threat from Hezbollah in 2006 and every once in a couple of years they bomb Gaza to attack Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
Israel managed to weaken all three allies of Iran: Syria, Hezbollah and Hamas + Islamic Jihad. But the threats coming from these three has not been completely removed, so I am curious to see how things will move forward from now on. One thing is sure.. An attack on Iran is out of question as the threats have not been (entirely) dealt with. Actually the nuclear agreement mightve been a trick to halt Iran from manufacturing any nukes untill the aforementioned threats would have been dealt with (an interesting theory).
I think Israel's next move is to attack Hezbollah (ofcourse with the appropval of USA).. They will continue to weaken the Iranian allies / threats in their close surroundings.
Calm down. As I said, if Western powers were REALLY keen on Assad to go by any means, we would have intervened long ago to topple him especially after the chemical attack . Western powers were wary of toppling him/going to yet another war and also for political reasons. That's the only thing that saved him. A simple no fly zone by the West like in Lybia would have been more than enough to remove him in a matter of weeks/month. I don't understand how you don't even get this.Sounds like you are a teenager......lol
You jokers tried your hardest to topple Assad. the gulfy donkey's spent billions on arming training & infiltrating terrorists from all over the world, all under your watchful eye.
However, Iran and Russia fuc*** you up good!
Assadist terrorists slaughtered over 1 million people and expelled over 12 million. Yet still control barely 40% of Syria.Syrians will rebuilt their country again under leadership of Mr Assad and hopefully Russia / China and other nations will help them develop proper defensive mechanism to prevent another war
Nice to see Russians and Good guys won
LOL yes I already heard that line before: "Arabs citizens who rose up against their tyrants was all a U.S Zionist conspiracy. " Arabs don't have brains, they are merely puppets according to some.
You are not saying anything new here unfortunately.
Calm down. As I said, if Western powers were REALLY keen on Assad to go by any means, we would have intervened long ago to topple him especially after the chemical attack . Western powers were wary of toppling him/going to yet another war and also for political reasons. That's the only thing that saved him. A simple no fly zone by the West like in Lybia would have been more than enough to remove him in a matter of weeks/month. I don't understand how you don't even get this.
Syrian rebels main supporters were Arab states(KSA, Qatar, gulf countries and Turkey to a lesser extent). We didn't really provide full military support we could have provided to the rebels. Our support was more diplomatic than military to be honest.