Asiya Bibi released BUT (NOT) left country

[I.R.A]

Government signed a treaty and should have upheld it.

Is that treaty valid? There is one grave mistake in that written document that renders it invalid and not relevant to this case. All four conditions in this document have that mistake. When drafting agreements and contracts one needs to use his brains .........

 

[Wa Muhammada]

yes she was hung by her balls when she confessed in the presence of more than 30 advocates and representatives from European Union, human rights commission and all media out side court ، in lower court، in high court، because it's a ball licking contest so these things come in your consultant mind , and if you quote then qoute my full reply not a abstract,


Whats fake I have quoted one of librals favorite countrie,s state media,God can be wrong Europeans can't be , as per one of so called consultant here on PDF, Don't close until it's proven fake and then sue BBC

Bro

Do u any links to her admitting her crime?

It would be of great use

 

[Zibago]

Good, she deserve a freedom without a threat....

May the pen di siri be with you

Is that treaty valid? There is one grave mistake in that written document that renders it invalid and not relevant to this case. All four conditions in this document have that mistake. When drafting agreements and contracts one needs to use his brains .........

Wording of this agreement is extremely hollow dullays got played

 

[ziaulislam]

Your point is correct however people have different ideas on what justice is and how it should be carried out. Therein lies the problem.

justice is what thee qazi dictates

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) armour had gone missing. One day, while walking through the market place, he recognised his armour in the possession of a Jew. He went up to the Jew and said, “This is my armour.” The Jew retorted, “Bring witnesses to prove it. Alternatively file a law suit!”

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) proceeded to Qazi Shurayh and laid a charge of theft against the Jew. The case came before the Qazi. Both plaintiff and defendant presented themselves before the Qazi.

Qazi Shurayh (rah), without being overawed by the presence of Ameerul Mu’mineen, Ali (radiyallahu anhu), seated himself with the stature that the occasion demanded. Calmly, without any trace of discomfort or panic, he commenced proceedings. He asked the Jew, “Does the armour belong to Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu)?” The Jew flatly denied it.

Thereupon the Qazi turned to Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) and calmly requested, “Bring your witnesses to support your claim.”

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) produced two witnesses. One was his son, Hazrat Husayn (radiyallahu anhu) and the other was his freed slave, whose name was Qambar. In his opinion, the evidence of these two was in accordance to Islamic law.

However Qazi Shurayh (rah) addressed Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu), Bring another witness in place of Hazrat Hasan (radiyallahu anhu). The evidence of your slave, seeing he was freed is accepted.” Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) replied, “I have no other witness.” Due to the lack of sufficient evidence – a second acceptable witness – Qazi Shurayh (rah) dismissed the case acting according to the Shariah and not according to his personal reliance on the truthfulness of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu).

The Jew in the meantime was observing the entire proceeding with full attention. On leaving the courtroom, he watched intently to see the reaction of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu). There was not the slightest bit of annoyance on the face of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu). Not a word of displeasure regarding the verdict was uttered.

 

[Zibago]

اردو میں بتاتا ہوں، ذرا کیبورڈ سے اٹھو اور عوام کو یہ بات سمجھاؤ،اور یہ بھی بتاؤ کہ 99 فیصد جو تم عوام ہو وہ چوتیے ہو ایک فیصد لبرلز درست ہیں،ا

Kon si 98% awaam? Apni taraf sey numbers na ejaad karo the country is divided on this issue

https://twitter.com/x/status/1059300648192303104

 

[Riz]

Consequences will not be good for country, that's all I have to say, Ik &PTi seems on sucide mission , they already have committed half of it,

Thugs are in jail.. Fake mullas are next.. Keep waiting there are many surprise for you upcoming days

 

[Imran Khan]

molvi maloona maloona bhonkta raha wo holland ja bethi

ab koi or maloon paida ker le ga

 

[I.R.A]

Wording of this agreement is extremely hollow dullays got played

The Urdu spelling of Asiya are not correct. You can put any Ahsiya as mentioned in that document on ECL, you cannot file any review petition against decision given for any Ahsiya (because no such lady exists), you cannot free people who were arrested protesting against Ahsiya release ........... the lady is Asiya not Ahsiya ......... the mullah in their hatred just got themselves an invalid document. They thought making her Ahsiya (the sinner) and not Asia would help.

 

[Zibago]

The Urdu spelling of Asiya are not correct. You can put any Ahsiya as mentioned in that document on ECL, you cannot file any review petition against decision given for any Ahsiya (because no such lady exists), you cannot free people who were arrested protesting against Ahsiya release ........... the lady is Asiya not Ahsiya ......... the mullah in their hatred just got themselves an invalid document. They thought making her Ahsiya (the sinner) and not Asia would help.

Ok in that case i dub thee Ashiya

 

[GumNaam]

ab sab aram say baith jao...

 

[Mage]

Unfortunately majority of Pakistanis are gay and spineless

ROFL

 

[Qutb-ud-din Aybak]

according to some news,she was released and moved to another secure and secret loaction in Pakistan by governmnet of pakistan.

 

[War Thunder]

Consequences will not be good for country, that's all I have to say, Ik &PTi seems on sucide mission , they already have committed half of it,

No they are on a mission to save the country from retarded ignorant jahil suicider awam who follow ignorants and call them leaders.
And burn and harm the property of innocents and little kids and call it defending the honor of the Prophet (S.A.W)

And they are doing pretty good... it;s just the low IQ folk will take some time to comprehend things because the veils of complexity have to be lifted first and things have to be made simple enough...

 

[Jf Thunder]

thats great
now can we get Aafia back as well?

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

justice is what thee qazi dictates

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) armour had gone missing. One day, while walking through the market place, he recognised his armour in the possession of a Jew. He went up to the Jew and said, “This is my armour.” The Jew retorted, “Bring witnesses to prove it. Alternatively file a law suit!”

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) proceeded to Qazi Shurayh and laid a charge of theft against the Jew. The case came before the Qazi. Both plaintiff and defendant presented themselves before the Qazi.

Qazi Shurayh (rah), without being overawed by the presence of Ameerul Mu’mineen, Ali (radiyallahu anhu), seated himself with the stature that the occasion demanded. Calmly, without any trace of discomfort or panic, he commenced proceedings. He asked the Jew, “Does the armour belong to Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu)?” The Jew flatly denied it.

Thereupon the Qazi turned to Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) and calmly requested, “Bring your witnesses to support your claim.”

Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) produced two witnesses. One was his son, Hazrat Husayn (radiyallahu anhu) and the other was his freed slave, whose name was Qambar. In his opinion, the evidence of these two was in accordance to Islamic law.

However Qazi Shurayh (rah) addressed Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu), Bring another witness in place of Hazrat Hasan (radiyallahu anhu). The evidence of your slave, seeing he was freed is accepted.” Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu) replied, “I have no other witness.” Due to the lack of sufficient evidence – a second acceptable witness – Qazi Shurayh (rah) dismissed the case acting according to the Shariah and not according to his personal reliance on the truthfulness of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu).

The Jew in the meantime was observing the entire proceeding with full attention. On leaving the courtroom, he watched intently to see the reaction of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu). There was not the slightest bit of annoyance on the face of Hazrat Ali (radiyallahu anhu). Not a word of displeasure regarding the verdict was uttered.

Great example of justice with a proper understanding of Islam.

All sorts of wrong was done to the Prophet and early Sahabah in Makkah, did they react as TLP did? No, they were patient and respectful, trusting in the judgement of Allah swt and the advice of Rasool saws.