Aoa
Keep your ch*tiyaapa, and don't twist information. We all know the issues LHC is not panchayat Lower court was also no tpanchayat where she accepted she insulted willingly and now apologizes. Why did she accept amnesty petition if she is not fool to face consequences. I think most know the case and its available on this site also.
No need for me to waste my time explaining it to a dumb*ss
We all
know what we want to believe.
I could easily say the LHC was under the pressure of the guys threatening the SCP and the Army even and the lot that killed s judge and Salman Taseer.
You could say the SCP is being influenced by the Government which is being influenced by foreign powers for whatever reason.
You accept the ruling of the LHC but reject the ruling of SCP, even though both part of the same system. The SCP can be influenced by external factors but you don't think the same about LHC.
Neither you nor I were eye witnesses of the events that you mentioned, nor are qualified (either Islamically or otherwise) to expertly judge on the strength of evidence and guilt, the Judges, on the other hand, are.
There are two aspects two this issue,
- Law of the Land and,
- Quran and Sunnah (and from it Islamic Jurisprudence)
With regards to the
law of the land, the law has not just detailed the crimes and their punishment but also how guilt and punishment are to be decided. It gives the courts the power to decide and they did so.
The LHC had the authority to convict her, and the SCP had the authority to acquit her. The law of the land has cleared her, regardless of our opinions.
With regards to
Quran and the Sunnah (and Islamic jurisprudence), this is not something upon which there is a concensus.
The opinion of Imam Abu Hanifa, whose fiqh the protestors mostly claim to follow, has been mentioned here and it is no where as strict as some here want.
The Foremost authority on Hanafi fiqh in Pakistan also says that it's a discretionary issue as the Shariah has not clearly defined a punishment for it.
Even if a crime has been committed ( especially in case of a non-Muslim), he says their repentance may be accepted. So Islamic Jurisprudence allows for repentance of a non-Muslim.
Therefore, even if one were to accept what you say about her confession in the panchayat (her alleged confession was in the punchayat court not LHC, in the courts she has maintained her innocence), she also is said to have repented there. In which case, Islamic jurisprudence allows for her to be forgiven.
---
Lastly, I believe in Allah and
Yaum al Qiyyamah, and that Allah will judge justly on that day. So even if she wrongly been let go here, and the interpretation of the fiqh in her regards has been wrong, I know that she will have to answer for her deeds before
Malik e Yaum ad din.
She isn't going to be the only one who'd have to answer on that day though, so I feel we must all take stock of our own actions both in general and in this case as well.
---
And Allah knows best