jackmars
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2014
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- -3
- Country
- Location
how close? more close than turks, mongols, tibetans?Simply because those 3 you mention were very very close to China. Just like one big family.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New Recruit
how close? more close than turks, mongols, tibetans?Simply because those 3 you mention were very very close to China. Just like one big family.
how close? more close than turks, mongols, tibetans?
Simply because those 3 you mention were very very close to China. Just like one big family.
New Recruit
definitely? lol, that means you are uneducated, you need to go to school to learn basic geography, see where is japan ,where is mongolian grassland,Definitely more closer than them. Btw, why do you include Turk? They are not even Sinic people like the rest.
definitely? lol, that means you are uneducated, you need to go to school to learn basic geography, see where is japan ,where is mongolian grassland,
and sinic? lol, the japanese copied from china so they became sinic in culture, or they would be nobody
definitely? lol, that means you are uneducated, you need to go to school to learn basic geography, see where is japan ,where is mongolian grassland,
and sinic? lol, the japanese copied from china so they became sinic in culture, or they would be nobody
Japanese people originated from China.
Allow me to clarify. Chinese, Mongolian, Tibetan, Vietnamese, Korean and Japanese are all Sinic people.
New Recruit
no, there is no such thing, japanese are mostly pacific islanders, their genetic makup are mostly o2b from south pacific and southeast asia, they do have some chinese and korean immigrants in history, but far from ogirinated from chinese, you need to learn history, not story.Japanese people originated from China.
Allow me to clarify. Chinese, Mongolian, Tibetan, Vietnamese, Korean and Japanese are all Sinic people.
no, there is no such thing, japanese are mostly pacific islanders, their genetic makup are mostly o2b from south pacific and southeast asia, they do have some chinese and korean immigrants in history, but far from ogirinated from chinese, you need to learn history, not story.
also, viets are closer to khmar ,not chinese, they do have lots of chinese blood, because of colonised by china for 1500 years, the koreans are also has no much to do with chinese, they are closer to japanese in blood, yeah, tiebtans are pretty much chinese because they share same ancestors
New Recruit
no, thats just one theory raised by japanese scholars,, never being proven internationally, only some of you japanese believe it, not even majority of japanese would agree with that, you go to japenes 2ch forum, they would laugh at you , also, those yao yi are minority of china, never chinese, you are very uneducatedNot only are you impudent, but it is you who needs to do some readings. FYI, the colonizers of the Japanese Archipelago occurred over 3,000 years ago during the period known as Yayoi Jidai, where people from present day Zhejiang Region of China came to Japan, as well as succeeding migration of people form present day Korean peninsula. Tho most of the incoming waves came from people who used to inhabit present day Zhejiang region of Chinese Mainland.
The modern history of the 'Japanese State' is interlinked with the State of Wu.
Ever heard of 吳語 dialect ? You know that early Japanese immigration to present day Japan were from people in what is now Zhejiang region of China? In fact according to Japanese legend, one of the early legends during the Yayoi Jidai is that Wu Taibu of the State of Wu (in Japanese we refer to him as Go Taihaku.
In a well known Japanese Historical Debate, also known as Jinmu Tenno Ron [Essay on the Emperor Jinmu] , the sympathetically well-known story of the founder of the Japanese Imperial line was actually a Chinese named Wu Taibo.
Japanese Legends are interesting, indeed, but in order to clarify its authenticity, its good tore fer to Chinese historical accounts. The original story of Wu Taibo (In Japanese he is known as Go Taihaku) was told by the Chinese historian named Sima Qian in the Shiji. Sima Qian notes that Wu Taibo was the uncle of the founder of the Imperial Zhou Dynasty, one of the states of the Spring and Autumn Era (700-481 BCE). Taibo was the legendary founder of the State of Wu. Wu Taibo left his country, renouncing his succession to the throne in favor of his more capable younger brother, an act that was much lauded by Confucians. He went somewhere else -- vaguely to the lands to the East where he settled and established a new Kingdom. This is where legend and historical fact may connect. So, is the First Emperor of Japan -- Jinmu Tenno -- somehow related to or was Wu Taibo ? We will never really know, but we can make assumptions to it.
Wu and Japan are very, very closely linked, historically speaking. Perhaps there is a reason why in your Wu dailect has some organizational similarities with Japanese.
So without a doubt @21stCentury has a point when he says that Japan is very very close to China. Because it is true, the present day Japanese people are descendents of the people whom came to Japan from Zhejiang Region some 3000 years ago.
Whether you like it or not, dude, Japanese are kin to Han Chinese. We may not be completely "the same" but we are kin.
Not only originate from China, but the Yayoi Migrants CAME from ZHEJIANG Region of China.
Literally.
im 100% chineseI don't even think you are Chinese.
no, thats just one theory raised by japanese scholars,, never being proven internationally, only some of you japanese believe it, not even majority of japanese would agree with that, you go to japenes 2ch forum, they would laugh at you , also, those yao yi are minority of china, never chinese, you are very uneducated
im 100% chinese
1. Singapore
2. Hong Kong
3. South Korea
4. Japan (joint)
4. Taiwan (joint)
6. Finland
7. Estonia
8. Switzerland
9. Netherlands
10. Canada
11. Poland
12. Vietnam
13. Germany
14. Australia
New Recruit
you doubt because you dont read muchlol, i highly doubt that.
How come Singapore scored so high? Can we take into consideration the sample size ? Should we not check the p value , as well as a value?
no, there is no such thing, japanese are mostly pacific islanders, their genetic makup are mostly o2b from south pacific and southeast asia, they do have some chinese and korean immigrants in history, but far from ogirinated from chinese, you need to learn history, not story.
also, viets are closer to khmar ,not chinese, they do have lots of chinese blood, because of colonised by china for 1500 years, the koreans are also has no much to do with chinese, they are closer to japanese in blood, yeah, tiebtans are pretty much chinese because they share same ancestors
You should know that throughout China's long history, so many different and countless ethnic groups have been merged together to form a super cluster dominant ethnicity we call 'Han-Chinese'. If the Roman Empire had held on together (like China) and did not collapse and become divided into the many different countries that is called Europe today, then Europe too would be one single entity and one single ethnicity. Does my point get across to you?