Asean will not displease China

[BJP*]

backstabber???

Nehru was exactly the backstabber.

When India got independent, it abolished those unequal treaties initiated by the British.

Well, Nehru suddenly thought the McMahon line schemed by the British, which was never recognized by China, should be recognized. He thought india should control Tibet since China was in civil war and had no time to take care of Tibet.

He knew China had controlled Tibet for the past 400 years, he still wanted to advance east to take those islands that is part of Tibet thus part of China.

China has warned him time and time again to stop, he just would not listen and thought he was very strong.

Well, of course, he got crushed. He got what he deserved.

Mate lets not talk about 400 years or 100 thousands years.
China assured India in 1954 that it will never use military force against India. While exactly after 8 years China declared intense war against India in 1962.

In normal terms it is called an act Backstabbing. However I would be interested to know the definition of "Backstabbing" which is taught in your country.

 

[ChineseTiger1986]

Yes you are right. Nehru showed adventurism by trusting chinese even when China swallowed peaceful nation of Tibet in 1959. Nehru didn't woke up in 1959 and the ultimately India paid price to trust china in 1962.

Nehru believed that India should either become a superpower or being perished in silence, obviously he never trusted China for a bit.

 

[EastSea]

ha,nothing you say can change the fact that they are siding with China in SCS,and not with you.lol..

Cambodian friends do their policy better than you, Manchu bro. They can do balancing to get money, he he. Manchu bro can't do that, regretfully. You are Han chinese follower, no good, bro.

 

[Martian2]

Mate lets not talk about 400 years or 100 thousands years.
China assured India in 1954 that it will never use military force against India. While exactly after 8 years China declared intense war against India in 1962.

In normal terms it is called an act Backstabbing. However I would be interested to know the definition of "Backstabbing" which is taught in your country.

What are you, a two-year-old?

China's promise of not using military force against India carries an implied condition that you don't move your Indian troops into China by pursuing Nehru's Forward Policy.

When you Indians arrogantly brushed aside China's requests for a standstill agreement (e.g. stop moving your damn Indian troops and border posts), China's requests for negotiations, and kept invading deeper into Chinese territory, the PLA had to put a stop to your invasion.

China promised India no offensive aggression. China did not promise to give up the right to self defense.

 

[beijingwalker]

with many friends in this group,Asean will be very pro China.

 

[ephone]

Peaceful nation Tibet???

You dummy lacks history knowledge and should learn more at school: Tibet was under China's Control Since Yuan Dynasty and was part of China since then. The title Dalai Lama was even created by Yuan's late emperors and every Dalai Lama had to be approved by China central government, no matter it is the emperors during the past dynasties, or ROC era, let alone CCP era.

In 1792, China's Qing Dynasty's Qianlong Emperor issued decree to create "Golden Urn" system as a way to select next Dalai Lama: Golden Urn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Of course, after the selection, it was also need the emperors approval to become the official Dalai Lama. Historically, there are more than one Dalai Lama later abolished by the Emperors for misdeeds or misconducts.
You idiots do not know that, right???

Tibet as independent nation??? Just another idiot with zero history knowledge.

Yes you are right. Nehru showed adventurism by trusting chinese even when China swallowed peaceful nation of Tibet in 1959. Nehru didn't woke up in 1959 and the ultimately India paid price to trust china in 1962.

We do not use military force against India if India did not attack us.

There is a Chinese famous saying: 人不犯我，我不犯人。 or loosely translated as: If you do not attack me, I won't attack you.

Too hard for you to understand???

The part "I won't attack you" is conditional. No country will be stupid enough to offer unconditional statement like that. Otherwise, you can put your tanks into Beijing, China won's respond??? You must be paranoid to believe that.

BTW, why change the direction of topic again??? Many of indians claim Tibet was independent nation. After seeing the historic facts that Tibet was under China control and is part of China for the last 400 years, you all then jump to another topic??? It was stated again and again that Nehru wanted to inherit imperialist british's unequal treaty (the mcmahon line), though never recognized by China and schemed by the british, to force it upon Chinese people. After being warned times and times again, he got what he deserved as a real backstabber.

Mate lets not talk about 400 years or 100 thousands years.
China assured India in 1954 that it will never use military force against India. While exactly after 8 years China declared intense war against India in 1962.

In normal terms it is called an act Backstabbing. However I would be interested to know the definition of "Backstabbing" which is taught in your country.

Hu Jintao begged Hunsen???

I can not refrain from laughing from such an idiotic comments. Hu Jintao is too proud to even beg anything from Obama, Putin or the pope. You think Hu would beg Hunsen???

Nothing related to my English here. Truth is hurt, he eh. I can say in the same manner whats chinese guys troll on PDF: Hu jintao went to Phnom Penh and begged Mr. Husen to do something for delay of cod of conduct, the price of this dealing shall be made from China to Cambodian friend for some infrastructure projects.
They do good business, isn't it ?

 

[EastSea]

with many friends in this group,Asean will be very pro China.

Asean will be be pro china, but for peaceful china not for chinese aggressors.

Peaceful nation Tibet???

You dummy lacks history knowledge and should learn more at school: Tibet was under China's Control Since Yuan Dynasty and was part of China since then. The title Dalai Lama was even created by Yuan's late emperors and every Dalai Lama had to be approved by China central government, no matter it is the emperors during the past dynasties, or ROC era, let alone CCP era.

In 1792, China's Qing Dynasty's Qianlong Emperor issued decree to create "Golden Urn" system as a way to select next Dalai Lama: Golden Urn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Of course, after the selection, it was also need the emperors approval to become the official Dalai Lama. Historically, there are more than one Dalai Lama later abolished by the Emperors for misdeeds or misconducts.
You idiots do not know that, right???

Tibet as independent nation??? Just another idiot with zero history knowledge.



We do not use military force against India if India did not attack us.

There is a Chinese famous saying: 人不犯我，我不犯人。 or loosely translated as: If you do not attack me, I won't attack you.

Too hard for you to understand???

The part "I won't attack you" is conditional. No country will be stupid enough to offer unconditional statement like that. Otherwise, you can put your tanks into Beijing, China won's respond??? You must be paranoid to believe that.

BTW, why change the direction of topic again??? Many of indians claim Tibet was independent nation. After seeing the historic facts that Tibet was under China control and is part of China for the last 400 years, you all then jump to another topic??? It was stated again and again that Nehru wanted to inherit imperialist british's unequal treaty (the mcmahon line), though never recognized by China and schemed by the british, to force it upon Chinese people. After being warned times and times again, he got what he deserved as a real backstabber.



Hu Jintao begged Hunsen???

I can not refrain from laughing from such an idiotic comments. Hu Jintao is too proud to even beg anything from Obama, Putin or the pope. You think Hu would beg Hunsen???

Tibet was independence state with his Nation, culture, religion, territory and history. Tibetan and chinese are ruled by Mongolian and Manchus, you shared same fate with them in the past. Tibetan regained his independence from 1912 same as Chinese 1911 when Qing dynastry collapsed. China has to respect its and let them to be independence state.

For what Mr. Hunsen did for China, Mr. Hu begged him. It's truth.

 

[oct605032048]

Mongolian Manchus Tibetans Hans are all Chinese. Mongolia, Tibet are all parts of China.

Vice FM Fu Ying is a Mongolian and she supervises China's ASEAN policy that vanished VN and PH's wet dream at the Cambodia summit.

 

[Rechoice]

Mongolian Manchus Tibetans Hans are all Chinese. Mongolia, Tibet are all parts of China.

Vice FM Fu Ying is a Mongolian and she supervises China's ASEAN policy that vanished VN and PH's wet dream at the Cambodia summit.

It's policy plot to cheating other people.

 

[oct605032048]

It's policy plot to cheating other people.

Apparently Thailand, Cambodia and many other ASEAN countries are side with China. It seems your plot didn't work.

 

[ephone]

Mongolians and Manchus are both minorities in China. In China, some dynasties were founded by Han majorities and some were not. Even for China's Tang dynasty, the emperors of Tang had turkic blood in them as well. After Song dynasty, Jin was also founded by Manchus as well. Those are just a few example.

However, all of them are part of China history, culture. Anyone will be stupid to claim China's culture is only Han culture. In reality, China's culture is the combination of all of those past dynasties, intellectuals from all minorities and majorities together who create the brilliant Chinese culture. You are just too stupid to understand any of that.

As for Tibet, its so-called independence was never recognized by China, and most international community. It was simply cooked by then british imperialists who created the notorious McMahon line, and Simla Accord as well. Of course, none of them were recognized by China. So China is in her right to take over Tibet. Otherwise, those short-alive so-called "independence" during the 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th centuries by those mongolian tribes, uighur tribes, hui tribes and etc during China Qing dynasty, ROC era should all be recognized by your standard.

I think you are just too stupid to learn history. All of those short-lived "independence" by certain minorities groups were all brutally put down by the central governments, not matter it is the Qing Emeperors, ROC's presidents or CCP's leaders.

Asean will be be pro china, but for peaceful china not for chinese aggressors.



Tibet was independence state with his Nation, culture, religion, territory and history. Tibetan and chinese are ruled by Mongolian and Manchus, you shared same fate with them in the past. Tibetan regained his independence from 1912 same as Chinese 1911 when Qing dynastry collapsed. China has to respect its and let them to be independence state.

For what Mr. Hunsen did for China, Mr. Hu begged him. It's truth.

 

[Rechoice]

Apparently Thailand, Cambodia and many other ASEAN countries are side with China. It seems your plot didn't work.

I don't think so, Viet govt don't used any plot here by conference, just express his opinion clearly.