JohnWick
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,085
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Ok But how fuel cost DecreasesThe AESA statement ended with being more capable rest is about jf-17 only.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ok But how fuel cost DecreasesThe AESA statement ended with being more capable rest is about jf-17 only.
I am speaking with knowledge, and can give you a break [in a technical discussion] easily.Please give me a break. JF-17 with AESA more capable because it reduces fuel cost for same type of mission. Plus have you seen the versatility of weapons it has. The jet is a multi role it can intercept with bvr and close range and act as a dedicated bomber and target executioner with precision strikes.
In western arsenal you would have to fly different type of birds for such roles. So jf-17 also reduces training costs.
Price tag is low because labor is cheap. In Pakistan and China technicians of jets cannot afford Ferrari.
Well you don't know about it how the stuff works ISIS Abu bakar al baghdadi claim of chlaphat etcWho will fly them? and what's the danger to badshahat?
Buying from China means buying for Pakistan and buying from Pakistan means buying from China we both produce parts of the jets.
I am speaking with knowledge, and can give you a break easily.
How many T/R modules are in the AESA radar system for use in JF-17 Thunder Block III? What generation? What functions can it perform? How many targets it can track in one time? How many locks it can obtain? What are its vulnerabilities?
Simply the label AESA is not enough - radar systems significantly vary in capabilities and design in reality. PESA; AESA; Doppler - are marketing terms.
AESA radar system have nothing to do with fuel economy either.
Jet is multi-role? Every aircraft and its mom is multi-role these days.
Come on yaar. Haar response ko argument samaj lena munasib nahin hota. Kuch batein mein conventional wisdom hot hai - sirf message dene key liya hoti hain.
USA tech sucks? Dude, you should not be talking about technology at all.Just look at this pay load western jets don't have this much versatility. One jet which is the only true multi role available in half the price tag. USA tech sucks.
View attachment 523144
Block 3 export version could have RD-33MK which is the most advanced and most powerful of the RD-33 family. Also it's smokeless.
?
Well you don't know about it how the stuff works ISIS Abu bakar al baghdadi claim of chlaphat etc
Pilots will fly them....
Adios!
Nahhh...... US made F-22 30 years ago and still no fighter of 5th gen is comparable to the Raptor F-22Just look at this pay load western jets don't have this much versatility. One jet which is the only true multi role available in half the price tag. USA tech sucks.
View attachment 523144
You miss the point, if it's a plain product buy than it's J-10.
If Pakistan offer 100% flight control software and other tech transfer, than Iranians may consider jFT, otherwise they don't like to trade with Pakistan.
Sure it will have. but what is advanced in RD-33MK beyond increased thrust
Nahhh...... US made F-22 30 years ago and still no fighter of 5th gen is comparable to the Raptor F-22
What that mean I don't understand its a world wide acceptance phenomenal type thing......Sure it will have. but what is advanced in RD-33MK beyond increased thrust?
You are brain washed wrongly and you have come to the perfect place.
Adios for ever.
FADEC for example.