Archie
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2010
- Messages
- 3,182
- Reaction score
- -11
- Country
- Location
I think they should be certifiable Lungis by now
Otherwise it would have been Bang Bang in Bangistan
As deadline ends, 88 Pakistan Hindus refuse to leave India
- Thread starter Karan Gulati
- Start date
Otherwise it would have been Bang Bang in Bangistan
Norwegian
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,001
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
Pakistan is a giant lab and millions of its people are used as rats to experiment on with new conflicting ideologies. The first one being two-nation theory, then Islamization, then Talibanization, then Islamic Democracy and so on. It's no wonder why our country is in such a mess with no clear direction or sight.
Careful with your words you might get banned.
Mamsalaphala
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2015
- Messages
- 797
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
India's liberal heart: Citizenship for Hindu refugees quadruples under Modi
The Modi government is living up to its promise of speeding up visas and citizenship rights to Hindus and Sikhs fleeing jihadi persecution in Pakistan and Afghanistan. This promise was part of the BJP election manifesto, which was much criticised for suggesting that Hindus and Sikhs refugees will be prioritised for entry and acceptance.
It was seen as a promise with communal overtones - and that is understandable, for the truth is historically India has given refuge to all people fleeing persecution anywhere. Unfortunately, violence is being ratcheted up in our neighbouring countries. Given the reality that the most likely victims of persecution in the neighbourhood are likely to be Hindus (and Sikhs or Buddhists to a lesser extent), the criticism of the BJP manifesto promise was a bit over the top.
According to a report in The Economic Times today (21 May), the Modi government has given citizenship to four times as many Hindus fleeing Pakistan and Afghanistan in one year than what the UPA did in its last five years (4,230 versus 1,023). Not only that, others seeking refuge have been given long-term visas (extending upto five years), as against the UPA's measly one year. ET says some 19,000 migrants have been given long-term visas and that the number of Hindus and Sikhs fleeing discrimination and terror from neighbouring countries may hit one million by December 2016 - and they all get permanent rights to stay here.
My heart swells with pride that we are finally able to help people fleeing religious terror and intimidation by the million at a time when so-called "liberal" countries in Europe are busy turning away boat people from Africa and racism is rearing its ugly head in Europe due to the influx of non-whites running away from violence or poverty. Or both.
Without denying our own in-built tendency for bigotry and xenophobia, the fact is India runs - by default, aided by state incapacity and apathy - the most liberal immigration policy in the world.
Consider all the evidence from the 20th century to now.
#1: Under the Indo-Nepal treaty, every Nepali citizen has an automatic right to live and work in India. No other Asian country has anything like this, and China and Japan allow almost no immigration at all.
#2: Every Hindu or Sikh fleeing Bangladesh and Pakistan, not to speak of Afghanistan, has come here. The Hindu population in Bangladesh has fallen from a post-partition 21 percent to under 8 percent now. No prizes for guessing where they moved. Most Pakistani Hindus made it here during partition, but the 2 percent still left are slowly seeing India as the only hope in the face of Islamic persecution.
#3: Persecuted Sri Lankan Tamils have been accommodated in India despite the rabid nature of some of these groups with murderous LTTE mindsets.
#4: India is home to the largest immigration of Muslims fleeing poverty in Bangladesh. Though these migrants have faced some degree of discrimination here, they have spread themselves in Assam, Bihar and West Bengal, and now further to the major metros. No one is being asked to leave as doing anything inhumane is impossible in democratic India even though the courts have asked the government to strictly enforce the Citizenship Act.
In future, we should not be surprised if the Bahais, Ahmaddiyas, and even some Shias of Pakistan seek to migrate to India. We should welcome them. India is for everyone, even though it is the ultimate place of refuge for Hindus anywhere.
The truth our liberals refuse to see is that no country in the world has accepted more refugees than India in the 20th century and so far in this century. But we still think it is communal to rehabilitate our own internal refugees - the 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits - near their former homes in the Valley.
Our secularists have distorted the real meaning of communalism so that the definition fits only Hindus. Our Lutyens "liberals" are the most
illiberal, uncharitable and myopic individuals of our time. The are good at pulling us down, nothing else.
They will always use caste as a stick to beat Hinduism with, but will not look out of their windows to see the everyday liberal heart of Indians.
The Modi government is living up to its promise of speeding up visas and citizenship rights to Hindus and Sikhs fleeing jihadi persecution in Pakistan and Afghanistan. This promise was part of the BJP election manifesto, which was much criticised for suggesting that Hindus and Sikhs refugees will be prioritised for entry and acceptance.
It was seen as a promise with communal overtones - and that is understandable, for the truth is historically India has given refuge to all people fleeing persecution anywhere. Unfortunately, violence is being ratcheted up in our neighbouring countries. Given the reality that the most likely victims of persecution in the neighbourhood are likely to be Hindus (and Sikhs or Buddhists to a lesser extent), the criticism of the BJP manifesto promise was a bit over the top.
According to a report in The Economic Times today (21 May), the Modi government has given citizenship to four times as many Hindus fleeing Pakistan and Afghanistan in one year than what the UPA did in its last five years (4,230 versus 1,023). Not only that, others seeking refuge have been given long-term visas (extending upto five years), as against the UPA's measly one year. ET says some 19,000 migrants have been given long-term visas and that the number of Hindus and Sikhs fleeing discrimination and terror from neighbouring countries may hit one million by December 2016 - and they all get permanent rights to stay here.
My heart swells with pride that we are finally able to help people fleeing religious terror and intimidation by the million at a time when so-called "liberal" countries in Europe are busy turning away boat people from Africa and racism is rearing its ugly head in Europe due to the influx of non-whites running away from violence or poverty. Or both.
Without denying our own in-built tendency for bigotry and xenophobia, the fact is India runs - by default, aided by state incapacity and apathy - the most liberal immigration policy in the world.
Consider all the evidence from the 20th century to now.
#1: Under the Indo-Nepal treaty, every Nepali citizen has an automatic right to live and work in India. No other Asian country has anything like this, and China and Japan allow almost no immigration at all.
#2: Every Hindu or Sikh fleeing Bangladesh and Pakistan, not to speak of Afghanistan, has come here. The Hindu population in Bangladesh has fallen from a post-partition 21 percent to under 8 percent now. No prizes for guessing where they moved. Most Pakistani Hindus made it here during partition, but the 2 percent still left are slowly seeing India as the only hope in the face of Islamic persecution.
#3: Persecuted Sri Lankan Tamils have been accommodated in India despite the rabid nature of some of these groups with murderous LTTE mindsets.
#4: India is home to the largest immigration of Muslims fleeing poverty in Bangladesh. Though these migrants have faced some degree of discrimination here, they have spread themselves in Assam, Bihar and West Bengal, and now further to the major metros. No one is being asked to leave as doing anything inhumane is impossible in democratic India even though the courts have asked the government to strictly enforce the Citizenship Act.
In future, we should not be surprised if the Bahais, Ahmaddiyas, and even some Shias of Pakistan seek to migrate to India. We should welcome them. India is for everyone, even though it is the ultimate place of refuge for Hindus anywhere.
The truth our liberals refuse to see is that no country in the world has accepted more refugees than India in the 20th century and so far in this century. But we still think it is communal to rehabilitate our own internal refugees - the 400,000 Kashmiri Pandits - near their former homes in the Valley.
Our secularists have distorted the real meaning of communalism so that the definition fits only Hindus. Our Lutyens "liberals" are the most
illiberal, uncharitable and myopic individuals of our time. The are good at pulling us down, nothing else.
They will always use caste as a stick to beat Hinduism with, but will not look out of their windows to see the everyday liberal heart of Indians.
Norwegian
BANNED
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,001
- Reaction score
- 11
- Country
- Location
I am a former Pakistani, so I know what I am talking about. If saying the truth is banned so be it...
Echo_419
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2012
- Messages
- 13,111
- Reaction score
- -4
- Country
- Location
We should give then citizenship
Yes I know that's why I am advicing you.
Because you know how it works here
'If you aren't with us, you are against us' and then banned.
They will be given Indian citizenship..... Don't worry..
Hold a minute Sir.....
Kashmiri have right in Pakistan controlled/Occupied Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan...
So if a Muslim from Indian side of kashmir goes to Pak side of Kashmir he will not called refugee...
Will you call Balochi refugee if he move form balochistan (to save his life form Pakistani fauj) to Sindh????
Hold a minute Sir.....
Kashmiri have right in Pakistan controlled/Occupied Kashmir and Gilgit Baltistan...
So if a Muslim from Indian side of kashmir goes to Pak side of Kashmir he will not called refugee...
Will you call Balochi refugee if he move form balochistan (to save his life form Pakistani fauj) to Sindh????
darksider
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- May 13, 2014
- Messages
- 1,923
- Reaction score
- 1
- Country
- Location
How can this indian chutiya piss drinker from world biggest toilet use these troll words for Pakistan on a Pakistani forum?
I am seeing this trend here indian chutiyas can use fowl language for Pakistan and staff doing nothing.
@Topic if they love india they should stay there.its their choice.
And if india want more hindus send others also.
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Those who flee Indian persecution are called refugees
And its called Azad Kashmir
Baloch refugee in Sindh ?
@KURUMAYA @DESERT FIGHTER
Bongian shoru''
That what pakistani claim. Those ppl are welcome in Kashmir.. May be they are terrorists who went to Pakistan administered/occupied Kashmir for terror training..
If Indian govt was such evil why many Muslim living in Kashmir??
Moreover, Its Kashmiri land, they can go anywhere in kashmir. That is not Pakistan, that is Paksiatn occupd kashmi
Zibago
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,006
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
Nope its azad kashmir which we freed from dogra raj
They are living in iok as slaves in their own lands
That is your belief, you are free to believe in what ever u want.. Unless LoC is made international border it will be called Pak ocpd Kashmir and India will try to get it back from Pakistan..
Pakistan will call it IoK and pakistani will try to capture it,
Kashmiri will keep crying for independence and they will either occupied by Pakistan or Accept 1948s Kashmir treaty..
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Russian air strikes kill 19 civilians in north Syria: monitor- Latest: Pakistan Space Agency
-
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Pakistan Space Agency
Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts
-
-
Imran Khan vs Pakistan: Protest of Treachery - Casualty Report
- Latest: Pakistan Space Agency
-
