Artillery Btn moved to LoC as Pak shells Poonch posts again

[DESERT FIGHTER]

they were not being hosted before 89. So there is an external hand in the upliftment of anti Indian thoughts in some of the workers of a particular party.

Thank you mr rehman malik.

 

[ares]

And ur highness it was india herself tht gave birth to LTTE... isnt tht a fact? heck u cant even control ur southern states to stop supporting ltte scum? even stop sellin arms to SL army fighting ur children...

Calling India as parent to of LTTE is akin calling Pakistan as parent organisation of Taliban and USA as a parent organisation Al-qaida.

Just like your facts, your knowledge about LTTE is superficial and incomplete.

LTTE was established in year 1976 .. 7 yrs before Indian govt got involved in the affair.
Initially Indian govt tried to support LTTE ...hoping they will address the genuine concerns of Srilankan Tamils which were being discriminated by Sinhalese.
But as the LTTE became increasingly violent, Indian govt not only withdrew its support but sent a hundred thousand strong IPKF to disarm LTTE.

After IPKF was called back and Rajiv's assassination..Indian govt decided not to play active role in this Civil war and instead helped Srilankan govt diplomatically(on international platforms), monetarily, with arms. in addition to busting LTTE sympathizers cells in Tamil Nadu.

T.

And ur highness it was india herself tht gave birth to LTTE... isnt tht a fact? heck u cant even control ur southern states to stop supporting ltte scum? even stop sellin arms to SL army fighting ur children...

Calling India as parent to of LTTE is akin calling Pakistan as parent organisation of Taliban and USA as a parent organisation Al-qaida.

Just like your facts, your knowledge about LTTE is superficial and incomplete.

LTTE was established in year 1976 .. 7 yrs before Indian govt got involved in the affair.
Initially Indian govt tried to support LTTE ...hoping they will address the genuine concerns of Srilankan Tamils which were being discriminated by Sinhalese.
But as the LTTE became increasingly violent, Indian govt not only withdrew its support but sent a hundred thousand strong IPKF to disarm LTTE.

After IPKF was called back and Rajiv's assassination..Indian govt decided not to play active role in this Civil war and instead helped Srilankan govt diplomatically(on international platforms), monetarily, with arms. in addition to busting LTTE sympathizers cells in Tamil Nadu.

T.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

do you even know how long our border is? and it is the BSF posted along the border, Army comes out only in emergency or president rule, you are forgetting that India is a democratic land.

Good for them...

Indian nuclear ideology obeys no first use policy, so ultimately, Pakistan would be the first to launch a nuclear tipped missile. Surgical strikes, covert operations were once said when Mumbai was under attack by 10 Pakistani Nationalists and it was an obvious reaction.

Yeah in tht case ur army is headed by a bunch of naive general.... for the lack of words... as for 10 PN good for you man... im still here so u can "palat k dekh saktay ho" dnt be scared.

Calling India as parent to of LTTE is akin calling Pakistan as parent organisation of Taliban and USA as a parent organisation Al-qaida.

Just like your facts, your knowledge about LTTE is superficial and incomplete.

LTTE was established in year 1976 .. 7 yrs before Indian govt got involved in the affair.
Initially Indian govt tried to support LTTE ...hoping they will address the genuine concerns of Srilankan Tamils which were being discriminated by Sinhalese.
But as the LTTE became increasingly violent, Indian govt not only withdrew its support but sent a hundred thousand strong IPKF to disarm LTTE.

After IPKF was called back and Rajiv's assassination..Indian govt decided not to play active role in this Civil war and instead helped Srilankan govt diplomatically(on international platforms), monetarily, with arms. in addition to busting LTTE sympathizers cells in Tamil Nadu.

T.


Calling India as parent to of LTTE is akin calling Pakistan as parent organisation of Taliban and USA as a parent organisation Al-qaida.

Just like your facts, your knowledge about LTTE is superficial and incomplete.

LTTE was established in year 1976 .. 7 yrs before Indian govt got involved in the affair.
Initially Indian govt tried to support LTTE ...hoping they will address the genuine concerns of Srilankan Tamils which were being discriminated by Sinhalese.
But as the LTTE became increasingly violent, Indian govt not only withdrew its support but sent a hundred thousand strong IPKF to disarm LTTE.

After IPKF was called back and Rajiv's assassination..Indian govt decided not to play active role in this Civil war and instead helped Srilankan govt diplomatically(on international platforms), monetarily, with arms. in addition to busting LTTE sympathizers cells in Tamil Nadu.

T.

Thanks but we all know who created LTTE... And who u were training in the 1970s in ur tamil nadu state...

 

[Screambowl]

Indeed the Pakistan army is India centric just as the Indian army is predominantly Pakistan centric - thats what rivalries produce but there is nothing to suggest that we're suicidal enough to force a Kashmir solution now of all times !

P.S those are some fantastical deductions made upon highly subjective (and creative) premises !

India has a wider view in being centric, we do not need to dominate your military, it will happen along with our own development in technology and economy. But keeping eye on your movements without interfering in your internal matters, doesnt make any one any centric. This is due to the illegitimate claims your have on Kashmir.

 

[blackops]

Dont you guys sleep ???

 

[SamantK]

All of the above on their own require exorbitant amounts of resources to execute and with an already pretty bad economy the Army is having a tough time managing that and still maintaining minimum deterrence on the Eastern-Front ! It has nothing to do with the 'acceptability or the refusal' of the armed forces for those acquisitions are made to ensure a minimum deterrence is kept in lieu of all the military acquisitions of India ! Its all nice and good to assume that peace will prevail between our two countries but its not going to happen yet and consequently for every one of your acquisition we need to come up with a proportionate response to serve as a 'minimum possible deterrent' in case hostilities to occur ! In doing this our already measly budget is practically asphyxiated with the demands of the WOT, the insurgency in Balochistan and the pursuit of 'minimum deterrence'; the Al-Nasrs, the Al-Khalids, the retraining and reequipping of the FC is hardly servicing Kiyani's pockets !

Yes that is the point, your country's armed forces are spending keeping in mind India which is not even spending the same amount in percentage as your forces are. We do not see Bangladesh, Sri-lanka and other south-asian countries spending so much, keeping India in mind, but why should they? Because they are not hostile to India and neither India to them. Pakistan has brought the hostility upon itself and has maintained it by supporting terrorism in India and waging wars on India, so if peace is achieved what will happen? Even with all that, who decides the minimum deterrent? last I heard Pakistan was ahead in making nuke warheads than India, why is that so?
Again I would say this that the Pakistan Army is capable of doing a lot of things, they are receiving aid to fight the WOT and it has been alleged that the bills presented were inflated so no guessing where the money is going.

 

[Screambowl]

Thank you mr rehman malik.

what ever you mean by calling the name of your IM, but for us it means terrorism.

 

[SamantK]

Thanks but we all know who created LTTE... And who u were training in the 1970s in ur tamil nadu state...

Who all know and what is you source could you please put it or you just wanna rant?

 

[Screambowl]

Yeah in tht case ur army is headed by a bunch of naive general.... for the lack of words... as for 10 PN good for you man... im still here so u can "palat k dekh saktay ho" dnt be scared.

to understand what in our general's mind is you have to become a more of civilian state than a military one. see the difference is, if your Gen. Kayani gets drunk , he will be the cause of nuclear war in the region. And why I say that because your Military is always India centric.

And if you bring an argument, of US involvement and Baluchistan etc etc, I wuld say that Gen kayani doesn't even give a damn if there is drone or covert operation by US marines. he knows, nothing can be done. Plus Pakistan military is in love with US. weapons ab somalia se to nahi kharidoge na?

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

what ever you mean by calling the name of your IM, but for us it means terrorism.

Good for you man... fire at us and face retaliation.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

to understand what in our general's mind is you have to become a more of civilian state than a military one. see the difference is, if your Gen. Kayani gets drunk , he will be the cause of nuclear war in the region. And why I say that because your Military is always India centric.

Do you think Kayani is like ur singh party? talking nonsense like limited nuclear war cant be justified... only an idiot or a fanboy would make such a foolish statement... get ur coas of tht cheap rum tht u guys serve in ur mess.

And if you bring an argument, of US involvement and Baluchistan etc etc, I wuld say that Gen kayani doesn't even give a damn if there is drone or covert operation by US marines. he knows, nothing can be done. Plus Pakistan military is in love with US. weapons ab somalia se to nahi kharidoge na?

Even india cant do jack infront of USA...the IPI pipeline was a good example how india backed off like a good girl... or maybe i should remind you about the "bhopal tragedy" where thousands of indians were killed thousands injured and the american roams free......as for drone strikes... it was u indians boasting and trotting a wiki cable abt kayani supporting them? even then... im sure india doesnt have the false impression tht shes a supa powa!.... so when u try attempting such misadventures we just retaliate...just like in this incident... as for weapons.. jiss say bhi khareedien ... whats ur issue... we sure wouldnt buy ur super LCA.....why dont u start importing a new engine for it ? and get it flight ready by 3012?

You are back to point 1. Pakistan's state in a state(you know what I am pointing to) doesn't want dialogues, as they are busy training the so called Mujahideen in PÖK to infiltrate. Since Our first Condition to start a dialogue is stop infiltration. You won't stop we won't talk.. peace talks ki maa ki aankh.

Who cares man... no evidence... no damn given!

 

[Screambowl]

Do you think Kayani is like ur singh party? talking nonsense like limited nuclear war cant be justified... only an idiot or a fanboy would make such a foolish statement... get ur coas of tht cheap rum tht u guys serve in ur mess.

In that case, Pakistan should go for no first use policy. I would like Mr. Kayani to comment if some one asks him about this. LOL

Even india cant do jack infront of USA...the IPI pipeline was a good example how india backed off like a good girl... or maybe i should remind you about the "bhopal tragedy" where thousands of indians were killed thousands injured and the american roams free......as for drone strikes... it was u indians boasting and trotting a wiki cable abt kayani supporting them? even then... im sure india doesnt have the false impression tht shes a supa powa!.... so when u try attempting such misadventures we just retaliate...just like in this incident... as for weapons.. jiss say bhi khareedien ... whats ur issue... we sure wouldnt buy ur super LCA.....why dont u start importing a new engine for it ? and get it flight ready by 3012?

and who one the earth told you that? Do you even know, USA as terminated all the sanctions for Indo Iran trade relation. IPI is stuck only due to trust deficit with Pakistan. US is no one to decide whom India can trade or not.

Let be on topic and in a precise way, let me tell you that, not even GE could built 135 inches long and 35 inches wide, weighing only 910-1000 kg turbofan having 120+kN thrust as equivalent to F-16's power-plant. Go and do some research. It was indeed a very tough demanded by Indian AF. All engines are heavier than Kaveri, even the one in LCA(GEF404) and less powerful.

Who cares man... no evidence... no damn given!

LeT is not banned just because it as a lot of users, there is some reason and its banned on the basis of those proofs only.

 

[Icewolf]

IPI is stuck only due to trust deficit with Pakistan.

WHAT A LIE! Fine I can think that India doesn't want pipeline going through Pakistan, but why did India go along with TAPI then, that runs through Pak also?? LOL, lies are exposed, USA forced India to quit because of Iran.

 

[Screambowl]

WHAT A LIE! Fine I can think that India doesn't want pipeline going through Pakistan, but why did India go along with TAPI then, that runs through Pak also?? LOL, lies are exposed, USA forced India to quit because of Iran.

India does not face any sanctions on trade relations with Iran, be it American or UN. We straightforwardly rejected American offer for a defense pact, this shows strong backbone.
India is already importing oil from Iran.

any kind of trade where Pakistan is involved, we will not invest there, as this might create insecurity.

 

[DESERT FIGHTER]

In that case, Pakistan should go for no first use policy. I would like Mr. Kayani to comment if some one asks him about this. LOL

Its our decision not yours to take....besides many nations have no such thing as no first use police... tht includes france,uk,usa and even russia... but none of our generals get drunk come on tv and fart about retarded "limited nuclear war" rant...do they? coz its retarded and nothing funny.

and who one the earth told you that? Do you even know, USA as terminated all the sanctions for Indo Iran trade relation. IPI is stuck only due to trust deficit with Pakistan. US is no one to decide whom India can trade or not.

LOL.. yeah right..
US pressures India to back sanctions against Iran

Let be on topic and in a precise way, let me tell you that, not even GE could built 135 inches long and 35 inches wide, weighing only 910-1000 kg turbofan having 120+kN thrust as equivalent to F-16's power-plant. Go and do some research. It was indeed a very tough demanded by Indian AF. All engines are heavier than Kaveri, even the one in LCA(GEF404) and less powerful.

Yeah 3012.... Godspeed!

LeT is not banned just because it as a lot of users, there is some reason and its banned on the basis of those proofs only.

Lashkar-e-Taiba was banned in Pakistan on January 12, 2002.

India does not face any sanctions on trade relations with Iran, be it American or UN. We straightforwardly rejected American offer for a defense pact, this shows strong backbone.
India is already exporting oil from Iran.

At a much reduced amount... and now under usa "ashirwad".