IamINDIA
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 8, 2010
- Messages
- 400
- Reaction score
- 0
HEHEHEH ABOUT THIS ARJUN MK2
Is that arjun MKII !!!!!!!!!!!!
i heard it was some japanese tank........
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
HEHEHEH ABOUT THIS ARJUN MK2
Is that arjun MKII !!!!!!!!!!!!
i heard it was some japanese tank........
You'r right. Its Japanese type 10:Is that arjun MKII !!!!!!!!!!!!
i heard it was some japanese tank........
Retired Lt. Col. Anil Bhat, a strategic analyst, pointed out that the Arjun tank is cumbersome for strategic movement, i.e. to be taken from one sector to another. It is too wide and too heavy to be moved in the railway carriages that we have in India. The comparative trials are just an eyewash as Arjun is incomparable to T-90" owing to the different weight class of both tanks.
Very impressive armor thickness by the way:
Ministry of Railways, RDSO, Lucknow were approached in 1992 to conduct a feasibility study for rail transportation of MBT Arjun. The study was based on a two pronged approach i.e. design of a new wagon and modification of existing BWTA wagon. The feasibility report was submitted along with all-India broad gauge railway maps showing sectors where the loaded wagon could move as class A ODC and the empty wagon could be run as non-ODC. In consonance, the Army HQ, Q Move (Rail) approved both proposals. The RITES / Texmaco team has delivered prototypes of the new wagon for field trials in 2006, it has been proposed that the case for modification to existing BWTA wagons be foreclosed because the population of the new rail wagons can comfortably match the production schedule of the Arjun MBT.
Good news...
But one must understand that T-90 is not the full version of Russian T-90 but a downgraded model...
It is better to have a capable Tank...
Any idea.. what are the futures of MK-2?
How come they don't employ sloped armour ?
Like other many tanks.