What's new

Argentina cancels Israel World Cup friendly after Gaza violence

Because of it's important jewish community after 1945...

But since Israel are in full "Alyah mode" for every jew on earth since 70 years... there is not that much "support" left...
That is around the world...

The US exception is not because there is many jews in power... it's because there is many Evangelical fanatics pro -Armageddon who needs "Israel" Behavior for there own "prophecies"... and those Evangelicals Sects... are the TRue power behind this "US Pro-Israel stance"...
Add that to a strong Israel Lobby...and you have it... A superpower at the mercy of a bunch of Fanatics and Foreign Politicians...
Various end time narratives are being promoted within the Evangelical circles. They are trying to figure out who are the Kings of South, North and East to prepare for the return of Christ. There is active alignment as well. Some are trying to pull China into this by promoting the idea that Chinese culture contains biblical concepts and that the bible can be used to interpret Chinese cultural concepts or that ancient Chinese were functionally Christians (not the Western version). The way it is promoted is not like conversion but rather a continuation of Chinese civilization. This is in hopes to sway the "holy war".


Shaddai = Shangdi?

The first step is a war of validation. First lay the foundations of legitimacy, then the following events would force nations into camps in order to protect their core interests. The camps they are forced into depends on their interests and ideas they validate. This is for both national and sub-national units. After the prophecies have been actualised, this will set the foundation of legitimacy of the post war world order.
 
Last edited:
.
Various end time narratives are being promoted within the Evangelical circles. They are trying to figure out who are the Kings of South, North and East to prepare for the return of Christ. There is active alignment as well. Some are trying to pull China into this by promoting the idea that Chinese culture contains biblical concepts and that the bible can be used to interpret Chinese cultural concepts or that ancient Chinese were functionally Christians (not the Western version). The way it is promoted is not like conversion but rather a continuation of Chinese civilization. This is in hopes to sway the "holy war".


Shaddai = Shangdi?

Let me tell you about what this correlation means. At least what in "Islam" it means.

Allah Created Humans and Allah sent Prophets In Every Tribe/Group/Civilisation... There is in fact 124,000 prophets sent btw Adam and Muhammad (PBUH).

The conclusion is simple... If you search in every scripture, in every civilisation you will find "Correlations" whatever such "groups" were cut off from each others or not.
 
.
The conclusion is simple... If you search in every scripture, in every civilisation you will find "Correlations" whatever such "groups" were cut off from each others or not.
There are definitely correlations between civilizations. Humans around the world have similar psychologies (differing environment might cause different behaviour tendencies), the societies we organise with these individuals have similarities with each other as a result. These similarities can be seen as "universal".

The dynamics of human societies had remained largely similar and we can extract some "truths" based on history due to the fact that we remained biologically similar and natural laws for survival and prosperity remained similar. Until that changes, we will largely remain in this narrative.

These forces can be manipulated, inserting a foundation of "truths" (identification of reality based on history) with sprinkles of aspirations. The aspirations push societies towards certain paths because the foundations feels sound and provide individuals with a sense of security. This way both the "truths" and aspirations are accepted.
 
Last edited:
.
There are definitely correlations between civilizations. Humans around the world have similar psychologies (differing environment might cause different behaviour tendencies), the societies we organise with these individuals have similarities with each other as a result. These similarities can be seen as "universal".

The dynamics of human societies had remained largely similar and we can extract some "truths" based on history due to the fact that we remained biologically similar and natural laws for survival and prosperity remained similar. Until that changes, we will remain in this narrative.

My argument was based on the "Religious" prism.

What I wanted to add to my previous post, is such...
Every Prophets had the same message with him, throughout History
- Believe in Allah ( meaning The one and the Only one, no equal, no Children, No Parents...)
- The reward in doing so
-The punishment in Not doing it
-And "Knowledge".

In the "Knowledge" part... we have to understand, that it was the same for each on of them. And for every new "Prophet" Allah will add Knowledge that the previous didn't have and so on.

It's why (under Religious prism) Such correlation around Humanity were similar.
 
.
My argument was based on the "Religious" prism.

What I wanted to add to my previous post, is such...
Every Prophets had the same message with him, throughout History
- Believe in Allah ( meaning The one and the Only one, no equal, no Children, No Parents...)
- The reward in doing so
-The punishment in Not doing it
-And "Knowledge".

In the "Knowledge" part... we have to understand, that it was the same for each on of them. And for every new "Prophet" Allah will add Knowledge that the previous didn't have and so on.

It's why (under Religious prism) Such correlation around Humanity were similar.
Often it seems like differing ideologies are dancing around the same "core". As they say 'the devil is in the details'.

Likely it's because I wasn't brought up in such an environment and not knowledgeable on the subject, I cannot prove exact connection (or feel it tangibly) between the prophets and their connection to the divine. What gives weight to me is the correlation between the words and the observed natural laws of the universe but some things are yet to be proven. That is the prism I look from.

I also believe knowledge is compounding, we all stand on the shoulders of giants. That is how civilization advances. One issue I see with some fanatical "religious" people is the stand still of progression they perpetuate.

If I may make an analogy: If the laws of nature were like the laws of physics. One learns Newtonian physics and observes in reality that is it seems like the truth and accepts the whole deal as the only truth (strictly). Life goes well as it is suitable for the context. Hundreds of years passes and the laws of Quantum physics is observed and recorded. This doesn't un-validate Newtonian physics (in fact it set a foundation) but a fundamentalist might say Quantum physics is impossible (or other words to discredit) since that wasn't the truth during the time of Newton and that society should revert to the time of Newton so that the tools can handle the present reality.

This would make it difficult for those stuck in the past come to terms with competitive pressures of reality and might cause some to take an insular position. In my view those armed with both (since both observations of reality are relevant) will best able to handle and push progress of civilization.

I'm not against any position but feel people should look from differing perspectives so that we can better triangulate (more dimensions needs more triangulation) the position of the "core" we are dancing around. I am compelled to support the optimization of society to fit the needs of certain environments, meaning some aspects of traditions are sidelined (not eliminated but in storage or active storage to meet the needs of another era). Perhaps tendencies of a society that is "optimized" is the manifestation of ideology, which makes me think certain aspects of ideology should be variable.
 
Last edited:
.
Often it seems like differing ideologies are dancing around the same "core". As they say 'the devil is in the details'.

Likely it's because I wasn't brought up in such an environment and not knowledgeable on the subject, I cannot prove exact connection (or feel it tangibly) between the prophets and their connection to the divine. What gives weight to me is the correlation between the words and the observed natural laws of the universe but some things are yet to be proven. That is the prism I look from.

I also believe knowledge is compounding, we all stand on the shoulders of giants. That is how civilization advances. One issue I see with some fanatical "religious" people is the stand still of progression they perpetuate.

If I may make an analogy: If the laws of nature were like the laws of physics. One learns Newtonian physics and observes in reality that is it seems like the truth and accepts the whole deal as the only truth (strictly). Life goes well as it is suitable for the context. Hundreds of years passes and the laws of Quantum physics is observed and recorded. This doesn't un-validate Newtonian physics (in fact it set a foundation) but a fundamentalist might say Quantum physics is impossible (or other words to discredit) since that wasn't the truth during the time of Newton and that society should revert to the time of Newton so that the tools can handle the present reality.

This would make it difficult for those stuck in the past come to terms with competitive pressures of reality and might cause some to take an insular position. In my view those armed with both (since both observations of reality are relevant) will best able to handle and push progress of civilization.

I'm not against any position but feel people should look from differing perspectives so that we can better triangulate (more dimensions needs more triangulation) the position of the "core" we are dancing around. I am compelled to support the optimization of society to fit the needs of certain environments, meaning some aspects of traditions are sidelined (not eliminated but in storage or active storage to meet the needs of another era). Perhaps tendencies of a society that is "optimized" is the manifestation of ideology, which makes me think certain aspects of ideology should be variable.

I Understand your position and in Islam it's actually the same... Whatever you believe it or not...
And let's put things where they belong... "Fanatics" are mostly the biggest "Ignorant" of their own belief...

In Islam... the search of Knowledge is of most importance... it's Literally an obligation...
Actually one of the Words in the Revelation to Muhammad (PBUH) is "Iqraa, Iqraa, Iqraa" , meaning "Read-Understand the meaning"

Here some Exemple:

"Are those who have knowledge and those who have no knowledge alike? Only the men of understanding are mindful. " (Quran, 39:9)
"My Lord! Enrich me with knowledge.." (Quran, 20:114)
"Abu Huraira reported: The Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, said, “Whoever travels a path in search on knowledge, Allah will make easy for him a path to Paradise.” (Muslim 2699)

And so on...

I also can reference a correlation of the "Quran" and "Modern scientific" knowledge found in our modern days... like the Embryo Dev/ Geology/ Big Bang formation and so...
If you are interested/Curious : https://www.islam-guide.com/ch1-1-a.htm


Ps: If we get to prove that "Boson of Higgs" is indeed an "enabler" of Mass... Then even with that we can prove it with the Quran, and the Last day ayats.
But that's for another day...
 
Last edited:
.
We should never have given you another people's land.
As if it was England's to "give"! The League created Mandate Palestine not to secure Britain another colony like India but to re-establish the Jewish "National Home"; Britain was merely the appointed trustee, with the especial charge not to act against the intended beneficiaries' interests!

Of course what happened was the Brits didn't have much respect for other peoples when it didn't suit Britain's leaders. The most obvious contemporary example of perfidious Albion was not the Mandate of Palestine but Neville "Peace in our time" Chamberlain's sell-out of Czechoslovakia. You know how well that worked out for Britain, don't you?
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom