Area where 16 BSF men were killed to go to Bangladesh

[Spring Onion]

BD, who has not fought a single battle, want to challenge Nation with long history of fighting...

Its a matter of time when India flow more water in ganga and China flow more water in Brahmaputra, God will save bangladesh.
By that time fight this...

BSF to open 500 new border outposts to check infiltration - India - DNA

The last time we saw India begging Nepal for stoppage of flooding

 

[MST]

As always indians are talking nonsense. In a similar thread in the past an IA officer, not with real name, told about how the 2001 Baraibari battle had unnerved the IA. This is why IA has kept on surrounding us with 300,000 troops. The conflict was an awakning time for the IA. BDR made the bravest possible stand against a far stronger battle troops fully expecting a death for themselves.

So 300000 IA men on Bangladesh border and 700000 IA men in Kashmir (according to Pakistanis). Then who the **** is on the International borders with China and Pakistan.

On a serious note if 300000 IA men were deployed on the Bangladesh border, Bangladesh will **** in its pants. You guys desperately need someway to convince yourself that 1 Muslim is equal to 10 Hindu isn't it. Thats what gives you a high.

And then you wonder why Indians here support BSF shooting Bangladeshi infiltrators on the border.

 

[MST]

If India attempted to invade Bangladesh the following would happen.

1. Jihad would be declared all over the world against India.

2. Kashmiri separatists would up their war.

3. The pro-Bangladeshi wing of ULFA would work with the Bangladeshi military to weaken the Indian army.

The Sigiluri corridor would be destroyed and north-east India would be cut off from mainland India and Bangladeshi guerillas and ULFA would jointly eliminate isolated Indian soldiers.

4. Bangladeshi forces would provide support to Maoists to escalate their war against the military including if possible a Maoist ground offensive to capture Delhi and Calcutta.

5. Even if India won the war they would basically have another Kashmir x 50 i.e. a Muslim-majority region occupied by Indian soldiers as Kashmir is but with a far greater population.

6. India would forever lose its reputation in the "third world" for being a peaceful non-imperialist state.

7. The Awami League and its pro-India, pro-Hindu ideology would be dead forever

8. Bangladesh once inevitably expelling Indian forces would then once its independence is restored work to get nuclear bombs and missiles and a powerful ballistic system that could wipe out Delhi, Ahmedabad, Chennai if necessary.

9. The war with Bangladesh would bankrupt India as the war with Vietnam did to the US and the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are doing now.

10. India would eventually disintegrate as secessionists inspired by the inevitable N.E Indian independence struggle (in this scenario the N.E. of India would be isolated virtually immediately).

11. Indians even if united would live in shame and humiliation for a thousand years (as some of the Hindutva extremists do about Muslim rule in India) at this defeat in the same way the Pakistanis feel bitter about their defeat in 1971.

When I read wet dreams like these from Bangladeshi's I shiver with fear of the day, they come anywhere close to Pakistani military capability (right now they are not even 10%), they are going to torture us to death with their mental masturbation.

 

[Hammer-fist]

12. You wake up in morning when a BSF soldier kick you.

Please post an intelligent reply rather than a cheap and meaningless oneliner.

1. If India invades Bangladesh - let us say they defeat Bangladesh in the initial conventional phase of the war - will Bangladesh and Bengalis do nothing if our country is occupied?

2. There are 7 million Kashmiris in Indian-occupied Kashmir and possibly a maximum of 0.7 million troops making a possible ratio of 1 soldier for 10 Kashmiris.

In Bangladesh if India even sent 1 million soldiers to occupy a country of supposedy "150 million" (real figures are higher) that would be a ratio of 1 soldier for 150 Bangladeshis.

3. Bangladesh would make Kashmir look like a picnic.

4. It is a hostile terrain for invaders as it is marshy and tanks cannot cross most of the country.

5. Bangladeshis that died fighting Indian troops would consider themselves as martyrs going directly to heaven so there would be no shortage of troops to fight the Indian aggressors.

6. In any war the Sigiluri corridor would be cut off instantly to break India proper from the north-east.

Do you deny this?

7. Do you deny that anti-Indian secessionists (ULFA has two factions one hostile to Bangladesh, and another neutral/favourable to Bangladesh) would work with Bangladeshi guerillas to jointly attack Indian troops?

8. Do you deny the theatre of operations would not just include Bangladesh but at minimum Bangladesh plus the entire north-east?

9. How long could Indian financially sustain an army of occupation in Bangladesh?

10. What would be the reaction of the Muslim world be to the occupation of Bangladesh?

If India ever attacks Bangladesh it will be a war till the very death. Either one state will be destroyed completely i.e. India or Bangladesh and to be quite honest it will be India that will be destroyed forever with its disintegration.

- Maoists have caused 40,000 deaths since their guerilla war started.

- Sikh-Hindu (Bihari, BIMARU immigrants) tension is rising in Punjab.

- Some of the people in the north-east want to separate.

- Muslim groups led by leaders such as Owaisi in Hyderabad are hostile to Hindutva extremists and will if necessary kill them.

Bangladesh will be the cause of India's disintegration as Afghanistan was to the USSR's disintegration.

Your friends and brothers the Pakistanis have tasted defeat at our hands, learn from them what happens if you mess around with us.

 

[MST]

Please post an intelligent reply rather than a cheap and meaningless oneliner.

1. If India invades Bangladesh - let us say they defeat Bangladesh in the initial conventional phase of the war - will Bangladesh and Bengalis do nothing if our country is occupied?

2. There are 7 million Kashmiris in Indian-occupied Kashmir and possibly a maximum of 0.7 million troops making a possible ratio of 1 soldier for 10 Kashmiris.

In Bangladesh if India even sent 1 million soldiers to occupy a country of supposedy "150 million" (real figures are higher) that would be a ratio of 1 soldier for 150 Bangladeshis.

3. Bangladesh would make Kashmir look like a picnic.

4. It is a hostile terrain for invaders as it is marshy and tanks cannot cross most of the country.

5. Bangladeshis that died fighting Indian troops would consider themselves as martyrs going directly to heaven so there would be no shortage of troops to fight the Indian aggressors.

6. In any war the Sigiluri corridor would be cut off instantly to break India proper from the north-east.

Do you deny this?

7. Do you deny that anti-Indian secessionists (ULFA has two factions one hostile to Bangladesh, and another neutral/favourable to Bangladesh) would work with Bangladeshi guerillas to jointly attack Indian troops?

8. Do you deny the theatre of operations would not just include Bangladesh but at minimum Bangladesh plus the entire north-east?

9. How long could Indian financially sustain an army of occupation in Bangladesh?

10. What would be the reaction of the Muslim world be to the occupation of Bangladesh?

If India ever attacks Bangladesh it will be a war till the very death. Either one state will be destroyed completely i.e. India or Bangladesh and to be quite honest it will be India that will be destroyed forever with its disintegration.

- Maoists have caused 40,000 deaths since their guerilla war started.

- Sikh-Hindu (Bihari, BIMARU immigrants) tension is rising in Punjab.

- Some of the people in the north-east want to separate.

- Muslim groups led by leaders such as Owaisi in Hyderabad are hostile to Hindutva extremists and will if necessary kill them.

Bangladesh will be the cause of India's disintegration as Afghanistan was to the USSR's disintegration.

Your friends and brothers the Pakistanis have tasted defeat at our hands, learn from them what happens if you mess around with us.

How old are you man? Why will India ever occupy Bangladesh. If we wanted to we would have done it in 1971. This is not 18th century that India has to occupy Bangladesh to colonize it. This is 21st century. Unlike 18-19th century when colonization happened by occupation in 21st century it happens by domination of the foreign policy and economy of a nation. Which is already achieved. You Bangladeshi's can whine and cry about it but on the ground you are already a colony of India.

 

[Spring Onion]

How old are you man? Why will India ever occupy Bangladesh. If we wanted to we would have done it in 1971. This is not 18th century that India has to occupy Bangladesh to colonize it. This is 21st century. Unlike 18-19th century when colonization happened by occupation in 21st century it happens by domination of the foreign policy and economy of a nation. Which is already achieved. You Bangladeshi's can whine and cry about it but on the ground you are already a colony of India.

we see everyday Indians whine and cry as if Indians had been colonised by Bangladeshis.

Now just imagine that just a thought of few BD members opposing India on PDF can make you feel helpless and crying what will happen when it actually take place.

 

[dollarman]

12. You wake up in morning when a BSF soldier kick you.

 

[MST]

we see everyday Indians whine and cry as if Indians had been colonised by Bangladeshis.

Now just imagine that just a thought of few BD members opposing India on PDF can make you feel helpless and crying what will happen when it actually take place.

Bangladeshis (some not majority) are more of a irritant with their distorted reality posts. They are not a threat wheather on PDF or in reality.

 

[Spring Onion]

Bangladeshis (some not majority) are more of a irritant with their distorted reality posts. They are not a threat wheather on PDF or in reality.

threat or not the issue is that you are feeling threatened thats the outcome of your mentality of considering BD as your colony.

 

[MST]

threat or not the issue is that you are feeling threatened thats the outcome of your mentality of considering BD as your colony.

Thats a funny statement. So if Pakistanis feels threatened by US or India have they started considering both countries as a colony. Doesn't make much sense. Maybe you can elaborate your point.

Anyways Its not my mentality to call Bangladesh a colony but a reality. Go ahead and ask any Bangladeshi (not an Awami) what Sheikh Hasina's relationship to India is and you will get the answer why i used the word colony.

 

[Spring Onion]

Thats a funny statement. So if Pakistanis feels threatened by US or India have they started considering both countries as a colony. Doesn't make much sense. Maybe you can elaborate your point.

Anyways Its not my mentality to call Bangladesh a colony but a reality. Go ahead and ask any Bangladeshi (not an Awami) what Sheikh Hasina's relationship to India is and you will get the answer why i used the word colony.

dahhhhhhhhh Sheikh hassina is NOT entire Bangladesh.

Just go and ask any Bangladeshi if they consider themself your colony and you will be drowned in spit

 

[MST]

dahhhhhhhhh Sheikh hassina is NOT entire Bangladesh.

Just go and ask any Bangladeshi if they consider themself your colony and you will be drowned in spit

LoL I don't have to ask them. just like Zardari is not whole of Pakistan. But who cares as long as the Govt is compliant does it matter what the population thinks. How many examples do you want. I have a pretty long list from Pakistan to Middle East to South America.

 

[abhishekgoel80]

BDR troops were ready to die and probably the short Namaaz prayer made them more ferocious before they started fighting.

Similar things happened in 1965 Pakistan-India war in Khemkaran, when only a company of East Bengal Regiment troops fought a half division Indian troops. Only four could not manage to become Shaheed.

Some questions?
Why not such Namaz work at olympics?
Why not they worked in gulf war?
So you know Khemkaran was the place where Pakistan lost most of their tanks in 1965 may be they forget to write allah-o-akbar on those tanks

 

[Spring Onion]

LoL I don't have to ask them. just like Zardari is not whole of Pakistan. But who cares as long as the Govt is compliant does it matter what the population thinks. How many examples do you want. I have a pretty long list from Pakistan to Middle East to South America.

Checks and balances are always there. and Public anger/opinion is one of these. BD has changed alot and India can feel the change thats why you spew venom filled with racial slurs for Bangladeshis.

The contracts of head of the state does NOT make BD an Indian colony

 

[MandarK]

Please post an intelligent reply rather than a cheap and meaningless oneliner.

1. If India invades Bangladesh - let us say they defeat Bangladesh in the initial conventional phase of the war - will Bangladesh and Bengalis do nothing if our country is occupied?

They will everything they want.

2. There are 7 million Kashmiris in Indian-occupied Kashmir and possibly a maximum of 0.7 million troops making a possible ratio of 1 soldier for 10 Kashmiris.

Your very first line was about intelligent post.

Most of the armed forces are located at the border. They are not based inside the towns.

In Bangladesh if India even sent 1 million soldiers to occupy a country of supposedy "150 million" (real figures are higher) that would be a ratio of 1 soldier for 150 Bangladeshis.

We dont need to send 1 million troops to occupy BD. 100k will be more than enough.

3. Bangladesh would make Kashmir look like a picnic.

100k people died in kashmir since 1990. This picnic will be disastrous for BD

4. It is a hostile terrain for invaders as it is marshy and tanks cannot cross most of the country.

Tanks are not the only weapons used in a war. There is something called air transport, naval blockade as well.

5. Bangladeshis that died fighting Indian troops would consider themselves as martyrs going directly to heaven so there would be no shortage of troops to fight the Indian aggressors.

We also have no shortage of people like Bajrang Dal, Shiv Sena etc. There will be no shortage of troops from the Indian sideas as well.

6. In any war the Sigiluri corridor would be cut off instantly to break India proper from the north-east.

Do you deny this?

Siliguri corridor is heavily guarded by Indian Armed forces. BD will fall before BD forces can even spell Siliguri.

7. Do you deny that anti-Indian secessionists (ULFA has two factions one hostile to Bangladesh, and another neutral/favourable to Bangladesh) would work with Bangladeshi guerillas to jointly attack Indian troops?

We have already finished most of the ULFA. Do you deny the fact that ULFA which is hostile to BD will grab this golden opportunity to attack BD?

8. Do you deny the theatre of operations would not just include Bangladesh but at minimum Bangladesh plus the entire north-east?

Last Time I heard, BD were being chased and Killed in NE. People of NW will consider it a golden opportunity to get rid of all illegal BD.

9. How long could Indian financially sustain an army of occupation in Bangladesh?

Infinity.

10. What would be the reaction of the Muslim world be to the occupation of Bangladesh?

Lip service and nothing else. What was the reaction of Muslim world towards Iran, Iraq and Afhanistan?

If India ever attacks Bangladesh it will be a war till the very death. Either one state will be destroyed completely i.e. India or Bangladesh and to be quite honest it will be India that will be destroyed forever with its disintegration.

BD will be erased from the world map. I am being honest and polite here.

- Maoists have caused 40,000 deaths since their guerilla war started.

Google is not banned in BD.

- Sikh-Hindu (Bihari, BIMARU immigrants) tension is rising in Punjab.

There is no censorship in BD.

- Some of the people in the north-east want to separate.

Last time they were killing illegal BD.

- Muslim groups led by leaders such as Owaisi in Hyderabad are hostile to Hindutva extremists and will if necessary kill them.]/quote]

Muslims are not in majority. Any such move will be dealt by proper law and order enforcing authorities. This is not BD where people can kill each other just like that.

Bangladesh will be the cause of India's disintegration as Afghanistan was to the USSR's disintegration.

We will make BD as our weapon testing laboratory. We ill test all kind of weapons on BD.

Your friends and brothers the Pakistanis have tasted defeat at our hands, learn from them what happens if you mess around with us.

3mn killed and still you needed help from Indian Army to save yourself. I think taking over of BD will be a cake walk.