Please stop lying. The SC cannot interfere in proceedings of the parliament for any violations of procedure, but it certainly can stop anyone from committing egregious constitutional violations.
You are wrong.
If the Speaker has reasonable cause to believe that any action in the Parliament is suspicious (i.e. NSC issues statement acknowledging foreign involvement in the NCV), then he has the right to delay that action until its legitimacy has been established.
The SC had the OBLIGATION to investigate the Speaker's concerns and look at the NSC statement and the memo in detail before issuing its verdict. The SC had no right to dismiss the Speaker's concerns without even investigating them.
It is the SC which violated the laws, not the Speaker.