Are Small and Homogeneous States More Prosperous?

[doorstar]

All of these countries were essentially homogeneous or had homogeneous authority during their rise.

Americas were especially successful when they were separate homelands for homogeneous tribes. then European diversity came and ruined it all.

sub-continent was also sooper great until the British came and ruined it by uniting warring principalities into one country.

sometimes I used to suspect this forum was run by an Indian, then a combo of indian, persian and deobandi hazrat. now I am starting to believe that it is Lucifer himself who is heading it due to proliferation of lies, misinformation and misguidance about almost everything in general and animosity toward Pakistan Army in particular.

 

[Pappa Alpha]

Would you argue the difference is authority not ethnicity or size?

they are interlinked

Americas were especially successful when they were separate homelands for homogeneous tribes. then European diversity came and ruined it all.

sub-continent was also sooper great until the British came and ruined it by uniting warring principalities into one country.

sometimes I used to suspect this forum was run by an Indian, then a combo of indian, persian and deobandi hazrat. now I am starting to believe that it is Lucifer himself who is heading it due to proliferation of lies, misinformation and misguidance about almost everything in general and animosity toward Pakistan Army in particular.

Why are you getting so worked up?

 

[nang2]

Americas were especially successful when they were separate homelands for homogeneous tribes. then European diversity came and ruined it all.

sub-continent was also sooper great until the British came and ruined it by uniting warring principalities into one country.

sometimes I used to suspect this forum was run by an Indian, then a combo of indian, persian and deobandi hazrat. now I am starting to believe that it is Lucifer himself who is heading it due to proliferation of lies, misinformation and misguidance about almost everything in general and animosity toward Pakistan Army in particular.

That is backward. In fact, US became much greater when European diversity came. Before that, it was largely a rural country with a small economy. The strength of US was the liberty it upheld, which allowed people from different background to strive with the best of their ability. Then people work together to better their lives. They naturally downplayed their differences or at least try to push them aside. After all, a dollar from a black is as good as a dollar from a white. That is why US is called melting pot. It doesn't focus on racial/cultural differences, like multi-culturalism does. It melts everyone into the same mentality, so called American dream.

Of course, there are many American politicians that do the opposite, especially those Democrats. They want to play the racial and cultural cards to trick people to give them power. They are the champion of institutionalized racism both in the time of slavery and now.

 

[Wood]

Pretty much every small island country is poor

Umm.. Japan?

 

[doorstar]

That is backward. In fact, US became much greater when European diversity came. Before that, it was largely a rural country with a small economy. The strength of US was the liberty it upheld, which allowed people from different background to strive with the best of their ability. Then people work together to better their lives. They naturally downplayed their differences or at least try to push them aside. After all, a dollar from a black is as good as a dollar from a white. That is why US is called melting pot. It doesn't focus on racial/cultural differences, like multi-culturalism does. It melts everyone into the same mentality, so called American dream.

Of course, there are many American politicians that do the opposite, especially those Democrats. They want to play the racial and cultural cards to trick people to give them power. They are the champion of institutionalized racism both in the time of slavery and now.

I was making an attempt at sarcasm which obviously failed. ah well never-mind.

 

[nang2]

I was making an attempt at sarcasm which obviously failed. ah well never-mind.

Sorry for my lack of understanding.

 

[doorstar]

Sorry for my lack of understanding.

not your fault, sarcasm humor etc. is not my forté

 

[doorstar]

Umm.. Japan?

under American patronage, before that their main industy was pillaging

 

[nang2]

under American patronage, before that their main industy was pillaging

Still sarcasm?

 

[doorstar]

Still sarcasm?

not this time.

without America first destroying and then rebuilding them and freeing them from any defense expenditure they'd still be murdering and playing ninja ninja

 

[Falconless]

100%. Elon Musk is product of American society. His success was within the ecosysten sustained by your people and nation. Doubt Elon Musk would have got far in Eritrea, Niger or even Pakistan.

Daddy’s emerald mine South Africa bearing fruit

 

[Hamartia Antidote]

Umm.. Japan?

How is Japan a small island?

 

[nang2]

not this time.

without America first destroying and then rebuilding them and freeing them from any defense expenditure they'd still be murdering and playing ninja ninja

The murdering grew out of its expansion needs, which means it had already become rich and powerful. For example, it had become more powerful than China before the turn of 20th century, way before WWII.

 

[doorstar]

The murdering grew out of its expansion needs, which means it had already become rich and powerful. For example, it had become more powerful than China before the turn of 20th century, way before WWII.

but my point is that you can't live off of murder industry indefinitely as it subsequently found out

 

[nang2]

but my point is that you can't live off of murder industry indefinitely as it subsequently found out

True. Murdering industry also consumes the inner strength of a nation. Timely stop would save the nation from collapsing entirely with it.