I don't know which wiki page you are talking about. But before we debate about this, I can tell you that, the original British Mandate for Palestine, which was supposed to be given to the Jews, included the whole of transjordan. So, why do you think Israel is occupying "palestine", but Jordan is not? You could equally argue that Jordan is also occupying "palestine" (something which our blackcrow would never admit)
Now let's get back to the agreement.
I'm specifically talking about the agreement with Faisal I of Iraq, the leader of the Arab revolt. He explicitly agreed handing over the WHOLE transjordan to create a Jewish state, as ordained by the Balfour declaration:
I quote from
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faisal–Weizmann_Agreement (Weizmann was the leader of the Zionist movement).
Remember, this was agreed to by the Arab supreme representative at that time. Due to this, the real wave of Jews started to immigrate. And according to the Balfour decl, Jewish national home would include whole of Jordan today. So, you could say Jews already made some painful sacrifice to cater to later Arab antagonism.
So, what was your point about Jewish 'conquest'....?
Listen blackcrow, this is not a place for immature kiddish drivel of your type. We're actually having a mature discussion here, which is way out of your league. So, better stay out.