rockstarIN
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2010
- Messages
- 6,168
- Reaction score
- -2
- Country
- Location
Can anybody tell me the major adventage/disadventage of NATO("45) & USSAR(39") bullets?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My uncle also has the M-16 nd M-4....and im asking my father to buy a saiga 12 and then il try to convert it into something like the AA-122...
M16 has been in service for decades and is a great weapon, though they are prone to jamming
as for shotguns, i'm a huge fan of the ones coming out of Turkiye lately. Some of the best handmade weapons of the world
Thts a milkor ...and just as well, the MKE's area target weapon --though this is not for civvy use
anywayz......
New Recruit
there's nothing at all wrong with keeping weapons for defence and for recreation.....
guns don't kill people,
people kill people
New Recruit
I can quote 1000 examples of how it is wrong.
For defence? AK 47? What world are we in? In civilized society you don't need assault rifle to save your family... There are so many options..
People kill people. But these people use such weapons not just to kill but the threat, coerce and bring mob culture..
During id people carry these weapons to holy places in Pakistan? why? to save themselves?
Others can quote 2000 to show ur wrong?
USA might have more AKs then russia.... are they not civilised?
People can also use those semi auto weapons to kill people and bring mob culture! some parts of north india are good examples.
Wats wrong with u?Too much zee tv?