The seed of separation was sowed by non other than the Quaid-a-Azam, Mr Jinnah. Blinded by his ‘2 nation’ joke of a theory, he forgot to take stock of Bengalis and their fierce cultural nationalism. Mr Jinnah’s speech at Dhaka University, where he expressed his desire to impose Urdu as the only national language, directly resulted in the Bhasha Andolon (language movement) in 1952. That was the first time, the Bengalis of East Pakistan realized, that Pakistan was all about the western ‘moth-eaten country’ (Mr Jinnah’s words, not mine), and for the first time experienced how brutal the ‘martial race’ could be to suppress a legitimate peaceful civil movement. No, India had no hand in it.
Two nation theory is not a joke AKHAND BHARAT is.See after independence you failed to recognize this truth that a part of AKHAND BHARAT is now a independent country,I have heared many Indians saying that Independence of Pakistan is a big tragedy so as of today when Pakistan exists its a testimony to it that the AKHAND BHARAT theory is clearly flawed and the Two Nation Theory Exists.By the way arent Srilanka Nepal and Afghanistan part of AKHAND BHARAT too
.
BTW insulting Quaid-e-Azam is banable offense here.
As for language movement simillar happend in India too
In the 1950s and 1960s, linguistic issues in India caused civil disorder when the central government declared Hindi as the national language of India. The nationwide movement of linguistic groups seeking statehood resulted in a massive reorganisation of states according to linguistic boundaries in 1956. At that time, Indian Punjab had its capital in Shimla, and though the vast majority of the Sikhs lived in Punjab, they still did not form a majority. The Akali Dal, a Sikh dominated political party active mainly in Punjab, sought to create a Punjabi Suba, or a Punjabi-speaking state. This case was presented to the States Reorganisation Commission established in 1953. It is generally believed that many Punjabi-speaking Hindus declared Hindi as their mother tongue in the censuses of 1951 and 1961, and therefore the census figures did not support the case for a Punjabi speaking state. The demand for adoption of Punjabi for Punjabi-speaking areas first created and later intensified the rift between Hindus and Sikhs of Punjab.
The States Reorganization Commission, not recognizing Punjabi as a language that was distinct grammatically from Hindi, rejected the demand for a Punjabi suba or state. Another reason that the Commission gave in its report was that the movement lacked general support of the people inhabiting the region.[18] Many Sikhs felt discriminated against by the commission.
Khalistan movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That was 1st strike.
The movement eventually fizzled out, although the sentiments were very much alive. Then in 1965, a tin pot dictator, Ayub Khan decided that he had balls the size of Jupiter and imposed an unnecessary war on India. The entire Pak juggernaut was concentrated in the West, and East was left, practically, unguarded. Had it not being for India’s concern over a possible Chinese intervention, which forced her to concentrate a large chunk of her troops in the North and North-East, or had she decided to risk the Chinese intervention and attack East Pakistan, IA would have practically walked right into Dhaka. Bengalis of East Pakistan, who had always considered themselves to be no less patriotic than their western counterparts, were finally convinced that Pakistan in reality belonged to the West, and East was just a ‘also-there’, to be milked when needed and thrown away when not. This led to the second wave of Bengali nationalism, which in turn led to the rise of Sk Mujibar Rahaman. And again, India had no hand in it.
That was 2nd strike.
Having less force in EastPakistan was indeed a mistake we should have more force there,however in the highlighted text you are saying that you feared china eh? hmm I think 1962 was quite horrible for you
rest is absolutely bullshit the operation Gibralter was quite a success had favoritism not came to this scenario and Ayub had not changed (Genral Akhter Hussain Malik who was about to reach Akhnor to cut IOK from India and then capture it)with Yahya Khan who delayed this offensive for 20 hours which was in its final Phase (Grandslam),and thus it allowed you to attack Lahore which was however which was fiercely defended moreover we gained territory in Run of Kuch so this war was'nt quite bad for us.
Apart from Grandslam the war was quite a success and Indias total attention was on west Pakistan to protect Kashmir the theory that you could attack East Pakistan and capture it and that this lead Nationalism in east Pakistan is just a cheap propaganda and Bullshit and if you'd done this you were sure to lose Kashmir its just a peace of crap.
All this culminated into Mujib's electoral win in 1970, by a large majority. But another tin pot dictator, Yahya Khan and his trusted sidekick, apparently in opposition and a clown of a politician, Bhutto, who would rather eat ‘grass’, simply dismissed Mujib’s victory, almost by a wave of hand. That was the 3rd & final strike and once again, India had no hand in it. This dismissal led to massive civil disobedience movement, to which the ‘martial race’ reacted in the only way known to it – brutal suppression, through Operation Searchlight. That and only that, led to massive migration to India.
Rants and Rants and BS
and if operation searchlight was suppression and not one to kill RAW trained mukti terrorists then same was done by India in Khalistan Movement,Nexalites tribals?
resultant refugee problem and finally, the direct military intervention by India.
This is why we now give great importance to your ill motives
First you train terrorists then send them to a Internationally recognized part of another country and
Then start a unsttopable propaganda against that country
Then finally attack it,then make some pathetic argument as reason for attack
.You accuse us of genocide you did same in case of Sikhs and are doing in Occupied Kashmir reportedly 47,000 Kashmiries have been killed in your state terrorism and you balme us for genocide.Hell Indra Gandhi got what she deserved
Death
,for genocide of Sikhs and Kashmiries.
The claim that India should ‘apologize to Pakistan’ for 1971, is perhaps the joke of the century and doesn’t deserve any further comment.
Who claimed this?
we dont want an apology but something simillar happening to India
.
