What's new

American Embassy School in Crisis after Khobragade Row

Was upset over 'stupid' criticism in Devyani Khobragade case, Preet Bharara tells Harvard Law School graduates.

NEW YORK: The Devyani Khobragade case came up for a discussion at Harvard Law School with India-born US prosecutor Preet Bharara telling the graduating class that the "intense" criticism and accusation hurled at him for charging the Indian diplomat with visa fraud had upset him.

Bharara was invited to address students and faculty at the prestigious law school on its 2014 Class Day ceremony last week.

The top US attorney in Manhattan spoke about the criticism he faces from all quarters as well as from various governments because of his work.

He added that he has even "been banned from Russia". Raising the Khobragade case, Bharara said he got the most flak for prosecuting the former Indian deputy Counsul General even though the case was initiated and investigated by the US State Department and seasoned law enforcements officials.

"You may have heard about the case we brought last year in which the State Department arrested a mid-level Indian female diplomat Devyani Khobragade for visa fraud in connection with lies about what she would ultimately pay her domestic worker (also an Indian).

"(It was) not the crime of the century but a serious crime nonetheless, that is why the State Department opened the case, that is why the State Department investigated it. That is why career agents in the State Department asked career prosecutors in my office to approve criminal charges. That case basically caused an international incident," he said.

Bharara said he became "personally aware" that Khobragade would be arrested only a couple of days before the arrest was scheduled.

He became bothered by the "line of attack" made by the Indian government and media that he brought the case to "serve his white masters, presumably (US Attorney General) Eric Holder and (President) Barack Obama", both of whom are black.

"That is an example of criticism that is stupid," he said, adding that as the criticism got "increasingly intense" over time, it bothered his parents and this made him upset.

"That was tough because it bothered them," he said. He was also concerned when he had to explain the accusations made against him to his young daughter, he said.

"That was not so pleasant. I'll admit that I was upset as I think a normal human being might be. But as the accusations got more and more absurd, they became downright comical and I got some of my perspective back," he said.

"Indian critics were angry because even though I hailed from India, I appeared to be going out of my way to act American and serve the interests of America, which was odd because I am American and the words US are in my title," he said.

He said, "putting aside disputes about the merits of the case," the Indian government and media decided that the case was brought by an Indian-American "for all manner of bad personal reasons, never mind that the case was initiated and investigated by career law enforcement officials."

Was upset over 'stupid' criticism in Devyani Khobragade case, Preet Bharara tells Harvard Law School graduates - The Times of India


@Abingdonboy @nair @Tshering22 @Indo-guy
 
Last edited:
.
Was upset over 'stupid' criticism in Devyani Khobragade case, Preet Bharara tells Harvard Law School graduates.

NEW YORK: The Devyani Khobragade case came up for a discussion at Harvard Law School with India-born US prosecutor Preet Bharara telling the graduating class that the "intense" criticism and accusation hurled at him for charging the Indian diplomat with visa fraud had upset him.

Bharara was invited to address students and faculty at the prestigious law school on its 2014 Class Day ceremony last week.

The top US attorney in Manhattan spoke about the criticism he faces from all quarters as well as from various governments because of his work.

He added that he has even "been banned from Russia". Raising the Khobragade case, Bharara said he got the most flak for prosecuting the former Indian deputy Counsul General even though the case was initiated and investigated by the US State Department and seasoned law enforcements officials.

"You may have heard about the case we brought last year in which the State Department arrested a mid-level Indian female diplomat Devyani Khobragade for visa fraud in connection with lies about what she would ultimately pay her domestic worker (also an Indian).

"(It was) not the crime of the century but a serious crime nonetheless, that is why the State Department opened the case, that is why the State Department investigated it. That is why career agents in the State Department asked career prosecutors in my office to approve criminal charges. That case basically caused an international incident," he said.

Bharara said he became "personally aware" that Khobragade would be arrested only a couple of days before the arrest was scheduled.

He became bothered by the "line of attack" made by the Indian government and media that he brought the case to "serve his white masters, presumably (US Attorney General) Eric Holder and (President) Barack Obama", both of whom are black.

"That is an example of criticism that is stupid," he said, adding that as the criticism got "increasingly intense" over time, it bothered his parents and this made him upset.

"That was tough because it bothered them," he said. He was also concerned when he had to explain the accusations made against him to his young daughter, he said.

"That was not so pleasant. I'll admit that I was upset as I think a normal human being might be. But as the accusations got more and more absurd, they became downright comical and I got some of my perspective back," he said.

"Indian critics were angry because even though I hailed from India, I appeared to be going out of my way to act American and serve the interests of America, which was odd because I am American and the words US are in my title," he said.

He said, "putting aside disputes about the merits of the case," the Indian government and media decided that the case was brought by an Indian-American "for all manner of bad personal reasons, never mind that the case was initiated and investigated by career law enforcement officials."


Was upset over 'stupid' criticism in Devyani Khobragade case, Preet Bharara tells Harvard Law School graduates - The Times of India

@Abingdonboy @nair @Tshering22 @Indo-guy



Months later ...Bharara have not got over with the taste blitzkrieg ran by Indian media against whole Kobragade affair ...

Hats off to Indian media :enjoy:
 
. .
What ever may be the reason or intention, But It has gone totally wrong.... and they were into a rude shock..... Why i feel there was a bigger agenda, Even after the incident they tried to cover it up and defend the action.....


Note that the maid had stolen files documents and laptops from Devyani and NYPD had failed to even register a case. This is a case of CIA paying the maid to get access to documents and files and use this case to divert attention and put India into the defensive . They probably thought MMS govt. being weak would not respond on the end of its tenure but this being close to elections , Govt. had to give a strong response ..
 
. .
Note that the maid had stolen files documents and laptops from Devyani and NYPD had failed to even register a case. This is a case of CIA paying the maid to get access to documents and files and use this case to divert attention and put India into the defensive . They probably thought MMS govt. being weak would not respond on the end of its tenure but this being close to elections , Govt. had to give a strong response ..

@Abingdonboy , @nair

This is quite possible !
Undue importance was given to the maid in this whole affair and she was completely shielded by them .

and the way her family was evacuated ... means that she was too precious an asset to be compromised .

The fact that maid's family had worked in various embassies further adds to the suspicion.

US took great diplomatic risk in evacuating maid's family ...there must be reasons why US administration took such risk ....
 
.
@Abingdonboy , @nair

This is quite possible !
Undue importance was given to the maid in this whole affair and she was completely shielded by them .

and the way her family was evacuated ... means that she was too precious an asset to be compromised .

The fact that maid's family had worked in various embassies further adds to the suspicion.

US took great diplomatic risk in evacuating maid's family ...there must be reasons why US administration took such risk ....

Yup true, i used to wonder, why are they shielding the maid...... I am sure a maid cannot be more important than a strategic relationship with India..... (at least for USA)
 
.
Yup true, i used to wonder, why are they shielding the maid...... I am sure a maid cannot be more important than a strategic relationship with India..... (at least for USA)
Good that it happened though.
The liberal secular fraction in india is in love with the west.
Maybe this episode disillusioned a few of them.
Although the old timers are still cajoling them.
 
.
Yup true, i used to wonder, why are they shielding the maid...... I am sure a maid cannot be more important than a strategic relationship with India..... (at least for USA)

I heard Modi had something to do with Nancy Powell leaving India , how much truth is there to that story ?
 
. .
I heard Modi had something to do with Nancy Powell leaving India , how much truth is there to that story ?
Well one explanation is that as GB & EU sensed that modi was the next big thing, they opened up to him(full 20 months in advance!!!). This was mostly on the recommendation of their diplomats.
The US did not. She put her leftist ego inbetween. That was a fatal mistake. Now, her job is to maintain relations. She tried to get an appointment with Modiji and took three attempts. That too she wanted to invite him @ US embassy and ended up meeting modi @ Gujrat.:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
After that meeting maybe modi hinted at something and she was asked to retire.
:devil::devil::devil::devil::devil::devil:
 
. . . .
US took great diplomatic risk in evacuating maid's family ...there must be reasons why US administration took such risk ....
Her maid was a Christian convert. That's suspicious because CIA has many Baptists and Evangelical missions in India. Its well known that CIA uses Churches for its operations. Who knows they caught the maid spying on her?

Need to press the Government for more information.

Tehelka - The People's Paper
American expats caught up in Indian bomb blast inquiry | World news | theguardian.com
 
.
Back
Top Bottom