What's new

American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

who brought NRO government???
Hmm who cleared zardari from 7 cases in Pakistan? hmm let me think. dajal justice opps sorry CJ dajal chaudry lol meaning iftikhar chaudry. now who elected PPP? hmm let me think :what: Musharraf right? i guess this is what you want to hear? well sorry but it were the public of Pakistan which elected PPP, now let me also think, who elected Zardari? hmm house:cheesy: then Parliament :what: opps wait it come down to people of Pakistan for electing Zardari because they elected PPP /PMLN members who voted for Zardari Along with all political parties. now let me also think? i guess this sounds wrong because we are Pakistani and we don't ever wanna take blame this is our genetic problem, now what should we do? :what: oh let's blame one guy like always! hurray let's blame Musharraf....:argh::argh: Pakistan ka Allah he hafiz:hitwall::pakistan:
 
.
Meaningless gesture.

It will take what, one phone call, to reverse this decision and put NATO troops back on the border within ten minutes?
 
.
Define "Buffer zone"?

Also does this mean "hot pursuit" has been abandoned?
i don't think so brother but hot pursuit will be in only that buffer zone, like back in 2001-2007. 2 miles strip along the boarder which will be called buffer zone. Both NATO and Pakistani forces will be ordered to stay out of it. Anything moving in between will be a target. simple and easy. beside boarder check post where civilians will enter and cross the boarder easy and simple. it should off been like this post previous government!
 
.
the question is why pakistan army gave clearance for attack, this is insult in pakistan army, who wouldnt bother nato attacking civilians but killing its soldiers is a big deal
 
.
the question is why pakistan army gave clearance for attack, this is insult in pakistan army, who wouldnt bother nato attacking civilians but killing its soldiers is a big deal

I dont think it was a clearance to attack. The NATO officers would have asked that if there is a Pakistani military presence in a given area and Pakistan would have responded in negative..
 
.
I dont think it was a clearance to attack. The NATO officers would have asked that if there is a Pakistani military presence in a given area and Pakistan would have responded in negative..

Are you dreaming??? Today the satallites and GPS system is very common. They are not joker who didn't knew that..
 
.
I dont think it was a clearance to attack. The NATO officers would have asked that if there is a Pakistani military presence in a given area and Pakistan would have responded in negative..

im saying that army gave clearance because nato had given coordinates to attack some civilian place inside pakistan, so army said, ok, yhey could attack, they didnt know instead of civlians, nato were attacking the army check post
 
. .
so basically they gave wrong coordinates to the pakistanis but right coordinates to their aviation team :/

such an error is soooo possible... isnt it?
statistically speaking, there is much greater probability that this was deliberate.
 
.
Yeah, they are leaving.

Security was reportedly strict around that place, people told to stay in their homes and huts.

Equipment is going first, the personnel will follow.
 
.
As we have contradictory reports from the US so this means they will not leave the base... they might leave to show on Geo News and comeback from the other side again....Our Govt and top Army commandz are in cohoots with the US/NATO for $$$... They are just showing a drama on media that we are vacating it but after some dayz that will be back in business once again with the US....secretly.......:smokin:

where do you come up with these wonderful flights of fantasy? forget the fact there are valid sources giving us the truth . do you need to cloudy the water with your theories? stop degrading your self with these false reports mate.
 
.
I dont think it was a clearance to attack. The NATO officers would have asked that if there is a Pakistani military presence in a given area and Pakistan would have responded in negative..



if you have seen the video and audio conversation of 2 American A-10 pilots that engaged a British column in Iraq, they did ask if there were any friendly units in the area and then they started the attack after getting the negative, despite the fact that British firing distress flares and clear NATO/ British markings on their vehicles (same as the Pakistani flag over the post) the giggles of the pilots over the injured crumbing over and falling from burning vehicles is changed in to cries and sobbing when the operator tells them that they hit a British convey.

So here either the Americans knowingly or by mistake gave wrong coordinates, got the negative answer from Pakistani HQ and then gave the go ahead to their pilots to attack. But I don’t know how clear were they in their questions about any Pakistani check posts, also any Pakistani troops within 3 or 4 KM of their requested area would have been communicated to them as part of procedure so there is a chance that Americans would have asked about something too far away that the answer from Pakistani HQ had to be a no that they had nothing there in that area.



Despite all this what is troubling is

They continued to attack when they received the blue on blue and ceasefire requests.
They, then returned and attacked both posts and levelled them to the ground.

This only points towards disregard towards ceasefire requests and a premeditated attack with full knowledge of who actually were their target.


Should the American pilots have clarified with their HQ that the suspected locations appear to be well dug in positions that appear to be established posts with a flag and communication antennas and aerials? (not a characteristic of terrorists and that too on a hilltop with no civilian population nearby). Maybe not if they had the same average intellect & attitude of the pilots over Baghdad who decided that the Associated press reporter was a terrorist and his video camera a rocket launcher and on that bases they killed him all other civilains around him and then celebrated the death of the children in a van by saying wow look one went right through the windshield haha, now Julian Assuage faces a possible death penalty (over “espionage” ) if he is extradited to America due to leaking videos like these.

No wonder Pakistan army refused to be part of their investigation farce because of the past experiences and deliberately dragging the date to end of December so that the story dies down and they can mount the pressure again with the usual premix of Haqqani support allegations and end it with “do more” bickering. Maybe such actions will help in showing the democrats as tough guys for the up coming elections against the Republicans but this attitude is hardly going to help in their plan to exit from Afghanistan in next 2 years time
 
.
In addition to what Irfan Baloch said, a white flag was also raised clearly on a tree branch thing.
 
. .
where do you come up with these wonderful flights of fantasy? forget the fact there are valid sources giving us the truth . do you need to cloudy the water with your theories? stop degrading your self with these false reports mate.
How U know about the facts....First they vacated the base after Raymond Davis arrest then they vacated the shamsi airbase after OBL raid . Now they vacating after this attack on our posts incident....I'm sure about the same thing happening within the near future too after next attack.....Sir! We don't care what the media sayz cuz they working for $$$ too.....:smokin:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom