Support to tolerance and respect is also important.
Agreed, tolerance and respect for people's rights to free speech is very very imporant.
If you want to pick up free speech causes, pick up the right to speak up against heads of states, against extremist doctrine, against national policies. Have you perfected these absolutely necessary for free living causes yet? Even in a country like the US, draconians laws like the Patriot Act exists. If you haven't kicked these major life and death issues and objections to Free Speech why do you feel compelled to support a criminal on drug charges and one who deceived people.
I am neither a saint nor a peerless defender of free speech and master wordsmith, there is only so much time I devote to discussing such topics, and I am not a lawyer or grassroots activist who actively works on such issues. The issues you mention are also strawman arguments to the issue at hand, just because there are other areas that can (and have been) taken up by advocates of free speech (whose job it is do act as watchdogs) does not make this any less of an issue. I support the freedom to have such garbage posted because we must allow what is distasteful to some (on the religious, political, and ethnic level) if we are to give free speech any meaning. Just allowing the speech we support and banning the speech we hate weakens the ideal of 'free speech'. Of course there are levels of this, but Germany's ban on holocaust denial can serve as an example of what I mean to some extent. There is justification, but that still doesn't necessarily make it right imo.
Youtube is a business. If it wants our business it should remove it. This is my right to demand it as a consumer or else I will move on to another service.
It is most definitely your right as a private citizen to demand youtube remove it or to boycott, and as a private website they are perfectly able to choose to remove it with no legal repercussions. They are also perfectly able to choose to keep it with no legal repercussions from the government of the United States of America.
I can also demand my country take overt actions against Google.
I am unsure if you are speaking here as a citizen of Pakistan, a citizen of the UAE, or a citizen of the United States (I explained the issue under the assumption of US citizenship, because those are the ones whose rights enshrined I am most familiar with.)
In either of the three In the US at least I am sure as a private citizen you are free to demand your country take overt action against google, and it is probably the same in the other two. In the United States, the government wouldn't legally be able to do this to google because it hosted this video. In the other countries they may legally be able to, because the enshrined ideals of free speech may not necessarily be as pervasive or set in stone there, and/or it may be up to the whims of the ruling government.
Ban out Android and you have killed billions in sales. Kill out the Search engine and you cut a few more Billions.
If your government chooses to do so (as long as it isn't the US government) there is not much to speak of. I assure you Google or Android as a multinational entity wouldn't go bankrupt, anymore than Mcdonalds would.