What's new

Alternative exists for Pakistan: Why there is little need to worry about Kabul’s threat

pakistani342

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
6
Country
United States
Location
United States
Article here, excerpts below:

Commerce Minister Khurram Dastgir told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Commerce in February this year that in the face of slow progress by Kabul on the trilateral transit trade agreement, Pakistan wanted to revive its trade accord with China, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan to reach markets of Central Asia.

The four-nation pact was signed in 1995, but it came into force in May 2004, allowing goods transport to Central Asia via China. This is an alternative route on
which Pakistan and China are working since transit and bilateral trade with Kabul has been at a standstill. This has upset both Delhi and Kabul with warnings and allegations coming from the latter from time to time.
 
. .
lol, Pakistan has alternative route through China or Even Iran. Now what this landlocked country gonna do when we will block all those access at will. Last time they knelt and begged for forgiveness because they burnt the flag of Pakistan on Torkham let see what snakes will do this time.
 
.
I don't have much hope for TAPI but CASA-1000 route should be changed even if its longer.
 
. .
Why there is little need to worry about Kabul’s threat
By Zafar Bhutta
Published: September 11, 2016
51SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
1180690-Nawazx-1473665627-194-640x480.JPG

Afghanistan’s warning to deny Pakistan access to Central Asia markets is not new. PHOTO: REUTERS

ISLAMABAD: Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani’s explicit threat to Pakistan that he will shut the land route for transit of Pakistan’s export goods to Central Asia, if Kabul is not allowed to trade with India via Wagah border, is not a new story.

Kabul has time and again pressed Pakistan to allow India to become part of a proposed trilateral transit trade agreement between Pakistan, Afghanistan and Tajikistan. Pakistan, on its part, insists India will not be welcome to the trade arrangement until diplomatic ties improve between the two arch rivals.

Open Wagah or lose transit route, Ghani warns Pakistan

Pakistan has suggested that Delhi could join later after a thaw in the bilateral relationship, but it could not satisfy Afghanistan, which has hampered progress on the transit trade pact.

During his first visit to India in early May last year, Ghani had cautioned that if Pakistan did not open the Wagah land route for Afghan imports from India, he would not provide Pakistani trucks access to Central Asia. Now, he has made the same demand again.

Since the inking of $46-billion Pakistan-China Economic Corridor (CPEC) programme, tensions have heightened with eastern neighbour Afghanistan as well as India which is on the western periphery.

China has also won the right to operate Pakistan’s Gwadar Port, which gives it access to Gulf and Central Asian states.

The economic corridor could become a major success if it is stretched to Central Asia – a big market not only for China but also for Pakistan at a time when its exports have plunged by $4 billion.

Wagah open for Afghan traders: FO

Even Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has issued directives for tapping markets of Central Asia in order to step up the country’s exports. Pakistan is looking at Central Asia as India wields considerable influence over member-states of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (Saarc).

Delhi is using Kabul to put pressure on Pakistan to allow it to be part of the transit trade pact. Besides Afghanistan, India is also banking on Iran to reach Central Asia via land route. In this drive, it has also signed a deal for developing Iran’s Chabahar Port, which is considered a rival to the CPEC.

India is building the North-South Corridor through Chabahar Port, which will reach Afghanistan and eventually connect with Central Asia.

Four-nation accord

Commerce Minister Khurram Dastgir told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Commerce in February this year that in the face of slow progress by Kabul on the trilateral transit trade agreement, Pakistan wanted to revive its trade accord with China, Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan to reach markets of Central Asia.

The four-nation pact was signed in 1995, but it came into force in May 2004, allowing goods transport to Central Asia via China. This is an alternative route on which Pakistan and China are working since transit and bilateral trade with Kabul has been at a standstill. This has upset both Delhi and Kabul with warnings and allegations coming from the latter from time to time.

US role

In addition to trade in commodities, Pakistan is also pushing ahead with regional energy projects, including power and gas import from Central Asia, with Afghanistan being a part of them. However, in this case Pakistan has no alternative.

The stand-off between Kabul and Islamabad may hamper implementation of the two vital projects including Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India gas pipeline and Central Asia South Asia (Casa) 1,000, which will bring electricity from Central Asia to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The United States too is backing these projects as it is eager to connect Central Asian states with Afghanistan, Pakistan and India.

Some officials even suggest that Afghanistan is piling on the pressure on Pakistan for including India in the transit trade agreement with US backing.

Ghani may call truce with Hizb-i-Islami on Eid

However, Pakistan has had a love-hate relationship over decades with the US, which is now openly supporting India. Washington is cooperating with Delhi in civil nuclear technology and has recently signed a logistics agreement. It has also supported India’s bid to become a member of the exclusive Nuclear Suppliers Group.

After the CPEC, Pakistan has also become part of the cold war going on between the US and China in this region. Some diplomats of Central Asian nations posted in Pakistan believe Afghanistan will eventually suffer if it spoils its trade ties with Pakistan at the behest of India.

Already, Pakistan has kicked off work on an alternative transit trade deal for accessing Central Asia through China and it will definitely be feasible keeping in view the fast progress on the CPEC.

The writer is a staff correspondent

Published in The Express Tribune, September 12th, 2016.
 
. .
Good read. Pakistan cannot be bullied by his own pet who has gone mad and needs an injection to cure the madness and rabbies ...The landlocked Afghanistan is nothing more than just a parasite on Pakistan's resources. If Afghanistan does not respect its agreement with Pakistan then the latter should not let Afghanistan use its land for any trade and deny all access and see in how many days the madness of the pet gets cured.
 
Last edited:
. .
I don't know why they (Afghans) thinking that they have leverage over us or maybe it's because we are toooo much honest kind and forgiving
 
.
The way to treat Kabul is the same way China treats India ; Baghal mein Churi, mun pe ram ram.
Essentially, ignore them completely. Ignore their threats and keep giving sweet statements. If they carry out some act, retaliate in kind and then reiterate statements of friendship. They want more attention than they deserve and since our problem of Koh-kaaf is being solved by CPEC; we have lesser need for their drama.
 
.

There is a lot more than a "little" need to worry about Afghanistan. Sooner or later, they will get some F-16's or Mig's, etc, some combat heli's, etc and India is there to support them in getting those. The main focus point those would serve, would be against Pakistan.

So if I was to guess, Pakistan will need a small air-arm (3-4 squadrons), plus couple of divisions of the military and associated combat support aircraft / heli's to permanently keep close to the Afghani side. This show has just started and India will make sure that Afghanistan can become a pain point for Pakistan. Just the way stuff works in today' world.
 
.
The way to treat Kabul is the same way China treats India ; Baghal mein Churi, mun pe ram ram.
Essentially, ignore them completely. Ignore their threats and keep giving sweet statements. If they carry out some act, retaliate in kind and then reiterate statements of friendship. They want more attention than they deserve and since our problem of Koh-kaaf is being solved by CPEC; we have lesser need for their drama.
Exactly..

It is funny how Ghani is willing to sink his own nation for sake of his Indian masters. If we close our borders then Afghanistan has no alternative whatsoever considering Chahbahar isnt even functional yet. Closing our borders for just one month with starve afghans to the point of civil war.
That's surprising but you don't need to go far...our own PM is far worse than him when it comes to loyalty and patriotism.
 
. .
There is a lot more than a "little" need to worry about Afghanistan. Sooner or later, they will get some F-16's or Mig's, etc, some combat heli's, etc and India is there to support them in getting those. The main focus point those would serve, would be against Pakistan.

So if I was to guess, Pakistan will need a small air-arm (3-4 squadrons), plus couple of divisions of the military and associated combat support aircraft / heli's to permanently keep close to the Afghani side. This show has just started and India will make sure that Afghanistan can become a pain point for Pakistan. Just the way stuff works in today' world.
You have a valid point but till the time they get those...Pakistan will have sufficient resources to adequately counter any threats from them...Furthermore who knows how long this imposed group will remain in power.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom