ucmicu
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2008
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Hey asad; you are just coming through as a "sad" badass! You did'nt get the hint from @RazorMC's reply to your earlier post on similar lines; so you popped up again like "a jack-in-the box"
When the last time India and Pakistan went to war in 1999; did China and BD enter the war? Did any of the muslim world?
As a matter of fact; China has never ever come to Pakistan's rescue through all the Indo-Pak wars.
And Turkiye and Indonesia coming to help? You gotta be nuts!
Don't sing that "Ummah-chummah" song. Nobody helps nobody. Not even for religious reasons.
You're still looking for that infinite "wet-dream"? Nobody gonna give that to you.
BD does'nt count for anything, like Somalia does'nt; geddit!
Ironically, I believe BD does very much count! A military base there is the future, along with another in sri lanka. As for the blockade issue, with relations with moscow improving: i believe it is time to go for pak 2 moscow, pak 2 istanbul, and pak 2 mecca HSR lines. railway link with kashgar is already underway. i really do not see how v fail to focus upon each parties weaknesses and strengths. look @ the bangali here i mean! his country's primary asset is the pan islamic passion -- and he is doing his job perfectly in translating any BD India war to a muslim hindu war. India is a diplomatic disaster, and the correct way to kick it is diplomacy. As for war: Pak weapon of choice is armor -- naturally closer to border than indian counter-part. The navy should simply be high speed, long range and short range, with VTOL preferably stealth fighters. This is not the age of carriers -- n PN would be out of tune to invest in them. Besides, with bases in gwadar etc -- would one rather not have a battleship in the straight of hormuz?! There is no defensive role for PN. only think internationally -- for Indians r 2 die under our armor, not ships!