AerospaceTech
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
- Messages
- 184
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Bro's yours dont know two thing.
Army isnt only give a tank palet to bmc. Army offer all of three competitors. Army say I can give to all of yours one of the two abmk of him 1. Abmk or 2. Abmk. One of the have german based other one modern based infanstructure. And companies looked, thinked and choose one of him with his offers.
Just becauese serial production of 250 tank and makeing prototype not a same thing. You need new huge machines, logistical infanstructure lines, test areas, and new infanstructure for new employess etc. When my visit to fnss factory , factory works with his fully potentional for just ttza's and korkuts . His production line cannot carry altay. Also Otokar is same.
So all firms will use abmks if hims selected.
So another wrong thing you know yours thinking bmc does not know make a tank and give a assistance from rheinmetall on rbss. But you forget one thing . All firms on project gives assistance from foreign firms.
Otokar gives a assistance from Rotem
(koreans), also fnns gives a assistance from bae and already like rbss firm. İn the beginnig on the serial production project bmc wants a work with koreans but koreands refuse him just because hims agreement with Otokar, after that bmc want a work with bae but they denied him for his cooperation with fnss. So bmc goes the germans but senate does not approve this for political problems.And now bmc going alone and gaining engineers from another firms like a crazy.
On the otherhand if project taken by otokar. Otokar cannot be produce this tanks due for engine ban from germany. Yes otokar designed this tank but bmc convert him more reilable tank. Just compare two otokar and bmc versions.
And last one political parties on the top generally supports many firms on the fields for creating new beast firms. Like koreans did it hyundai, samsung or japans did it on mitsubishi . İn our country that firms cannot be gezici Otokar or fnss. He will be head supported person.
OTOKAR was the best option, BMC was favoured because of political reasons.
You can not make this another way.
Ethem Sancak's interview says more than you what you said.