All of India runs on dynasties, why single me out: Rahul at Berkeley

[unbiasedopinion]

"Why we Indians?" you speak on behalf of Indians?
@ashok321

Genius, I mentioned "We, Indians" not "We, all Indians" There is a difference. Also being Indians and people I am interacting in my area have the same opinion i.e had there been strong opposition, Modi government would have been careful in their experiments. But we have not other option. We have given 60+ years to Congress to improve but they have not worked in that direction. The corruption was not controlled, the reforms were stalled etc. UPA2 was disaster for us. Lots of corruption happened during that era which BJP was successfully able to brought in the public domain. Till now congress is not able to bring any graft charges against BJP. Even they are not able to make noise for the failed demonetization experiment. The RBI has given them enough ammo for opposition to scrutinize the government but there is no effort from them to even highlight it. Such is a state of hopelessness from opposition.

Yes he is speaking on behalf of Indians.

We don't need a traitor like the tagged one to speak for us.

Thanks Buddy!!!

'We' of course includes me and I am an Indian. There's a different between 'We' and 'All'. 'We' can be referred to as '2 persons' or '4 persons' or '1 billion persons'. Here 'We' is referred to as 'majority of people'.

Exactly I was typing the same as response then I saw your reply hence refrained from repeating. Thanks for the support.

Ok Indian....

View attachment 425008

Remember 69% Indians did not vote for Modi.
I am one of them.

Do you guys even comprehend what we (Indians) are posting in this thread or your hate is so blind that you cannot even understand that we are supporting the idea of having strong opposition who can counter the current Modi wave. Go and read the posts which we Indians are posting in response to understand the notion.

 

[Pumba]

"Why we Indians?" you speak on behalf of Indians?
@ashok321

Yes he does.

problem ?

 

[Joe Shearer]

50 cents army？

Shame on you, using this phrase derogatory to our members from a particular country. I am shocked; I am appalled. I am wondering if you should be reported, or given a negative rating, or both!

Just for the record, 50 cents is about Rs. 35, perhaps a little less at the moment. About right, I should think; perhaps the PDF shakha gets slightly more.

 

[Tamil_Manithan]

RAGA is a figure of laugh.
Prime Minister of India is not a dynast.
The President and the vice President are not dynast.
33 out of 36 Chief Ministers are not dynast.
And RAGA portraits India as a dynastic country. And that in front of foreign students.
Hopefully congress will die ASAP.

 

[Joe Shearer]

Now the world will understand why we Indians keep going with BJP. if we have opposition like RG, we have no other option but to go with BJP.

And that is the painful truth.

"Why we Indians?" you speak on behalf of Indians?
@ashok321

Many Indians?

The member you have tagged is not an Indian.

 

[t_for_talli]

Pappu is the reason for Modi's win,

If Congress promotes Jyotiraditya Scindia as leader of opposition then they can save their faces

 

[GodToons]

For once American will think that Trump is wise choice politician listening rants of Rahul Gandhi. RG is biggest reason behind Modi in power.

 

[beijingwalker]

"The Nehru Gandhi brand has no peer in the world — a member of the family has been in charge of India for 40 of the 60 years since independence. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehru–Gandhi_family

That's how democracy works

Actually there is a peer in the world. Kim's North Korea.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

"The Nehru Gandhi brand has no peer in the world — a member of the family has been in charge of India for 40 of the 60 years since independence. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehru–Gandhi_family

That's how democracy works

Actually there is a peer in the world. Kim's North Korea.

Talking about past? it is 40 out of 70 years. Get you facts correct. So almost 50%. Earlier years were because of clout of Gandhi and nehru on congress party and they being critical in India's independence. Now with emergence of other political centers, people want to try them over Congress and that is what happened recently when people voted for BJP, AAP, TMC etc.

India 50 rupees army

Censoring twitter post

Blocking internet connectivity

Press media owned by big company

India so called democracy is fake, its censorship is on par with China



Jokes on you

https://thewire.in/173958/centres-request-twitter-blocks-accounts-tweets-kashmir-content/

Democracy is the word which has meaning within the ambit of Indian constitution. Anything which is against the constitution is also against the democracy no matter how much you shout.

Just like being in democracy does not mean that it will allow some to have $ex with kids because someone wants to have its own way of living, the same way anything which is against the core idea of India cannot be entertained under the disguise of democracy.

 

[beijingwalker]

Talking about past? it is 40 out of 70 years. Get you facts correct. So almost 50%. Earlier years were because of clout of Gandhi and nehru on congress party and they being critical in India's independence. Now with emergence of other political centers, people want to try them over Congress and that is what happened recently when people voted for BJP, AAP, TMC etc.

The family is still very influential in Indian politics even today , isn't it? No Chinese top leaders in PRC are related in the history. Chinese leaders are chosen based on their merits while Indian's based on family bloodlines.

 

[unbiasedopinion]

The family is still very influential in Indian politics even today , isn't it? No Chinese top leaders in PRC are related in the history. Chinese leaders are chosen based on their merits while Indian's based on family bloodlines.

Did any one or anything in the report asked about merits of chinese leaders? Then why posting unwarranted references?

Yes, of-course they are influential because they have given more than 50% of Indian PMs. Like it or not but that is a fact and it will remain for sometime till Indian public is aware of real meaning of democracy.

 

[Chhatrapati]

The family is still very influential in Indian politics even today , isn't it? No Chinese top leaders in PRC are related. Chinese leaders are chosen based on their merits while Indian's based on family bloodlines.

Oh really. Then how come Hu jintao's son become the deputy Party Committee Secretary and mayor of Jiaxing.

That's just one person. Who knows how many more.

How about the daughter/sons of Communist party members studying in Harvard, Cambridge, US, Australia or
Canadian universities?

If a person has proper connection in China, he can have many benefits.

It's a normal human behavour to secure the future of their children. If you go to US, you can see the dynasty politics. Family of any leaders in power also secure some high positions in government. Later their kids join in as someone.

Another example is movie industry.

 

[beijingwalker]

Oh really. Then how come Hu jintao's son become the deputy Party Committee Secretary and mayor of Jiaxing.

That's just one person. Who knows how many more.

How about the daughter/sons of Communist party members studying in Harvard, Cambridge, US, Australia or
Canadian universities?

If a person has proper connection in China, he can have many benefits.

It's a normal human behavour to secure the future of their children. If you go to US, you can see the dynasty politics. Family of any leaders in power also secure some high positions in government. Later their kids join in as someone.

Another example is movie industry.

I say top leadership, who cares about county, city level officials who almost have no chance to reach to the top. If you include that you can find connections in every country, it's not called dynasties as you can see in India and North Korea.

 

[seesonic]

Oh really. Then how come Hu jintao's son become the deputy Party Committee Secretary and mayor of Jiaxing.

That's just one person. Who knows how many more.

How about the daughter/sons of Communist party members studying in Harvard, Cambridge, US, Australia or
Canadian universities?

If a person has proper connection in China, he can have many benefits.

It's a normal human behavour to secure the future of their children. If you go to US, you can see the dynasty politics. Family of any leaders in power also secure some high positions in government. Later their kids join in as someone.

Another example is movie industry.

The question is how many indian politicians are awarded with degrees from a good reputable school

These are ivy league school with reputation to up hold, they dont take in any animals you know?

 

[Chhatrapati]

The question is how many indian politicians are awarded with degrees from a good reputable school

These are ivy league school with reputation to up hold, they dont take in any animals you know?

Don't quote me for the sake of quoting me. You are not a Chinese, nor you are Indian.

The question or reply is not directed at you.

Thanks

I say top leadership, who cares about county, city level officials who almost have no chance to reach to the top. If you include that you can find connections in every country, it's not called dynasties as you can see in India and North Korea.

So, the meritocracy is not valid for low ranking officials.

Hu Jintao was Chinese premier right? So, his son becoming mayor is not ideal for your argument.