What's new

All of India runs on dynasties, why single me out: Rahul at Berkeley

What happened to all that 'factual' pride? Ran out of steam? You are no Zimbabwean. You are a Bangladeshi or Pakistani.

Its fine, as long as it isnt indian :D

Ah! If you are desperate for an answer. Here goes the politicians who went to Ivy. Those I can figure. There are more than a 1000 people in upper and lower houses of parliament. I can't dig up the details of everyone.

I'll pick the easy one's.

Starting with Jawaharlal Nehru -- Cambridge, Rajiv Gandhi -- Cambridge, Manmohan Singh -- Oxford, Shashi Taroor -- Tuff's University, Jayram Ramesh -- MIT.

I'm not a warrior :lol: I tried to avoid your rants, just that you are asking for it. I hope you sleep well after reading this.

alright alright. You can skip your refresher course :D
 
. . .
"The Nehru Gandhi brand has no peer in the world — a member of the family has been in charged of India for 40 of the 60 years since independence. "

That's how democracy works

Actually there is a peer in the world. Kim's North Korea.

Let's decide post independence time in 2 equal parts first 35 and second 35 years. Now look at the PM of independent India in those times. the difference in quite clear. Only 1 term to Rajiv Gandhi in second 35 years term, while in first 35 years 80% was ruled by Nehru/Gandhi family.
So yes for immediate post independence period, your argument holds water. But then Indians don't have much of options in those times. No means of communication. Backward and illiterate population was the reasons of Dynasty rule.
 
. . .
Atleast tag a real Indian and not a false flagger. If you want to tag an Indian opposed to Modi there are many of them like @The_Showstopper @padamchen @takeiteasy etc

I'm not "opposed to Modi"

That's way too shallow and misses the point.

I believe the Sangh and sanghis are a cancer that has taken root deep in India.

Radical excision is now called for. Simple medicines won't work.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Let's decide post independence time in 2 equal parts first 35 and second 35 years. Now look at the PM of independent India in those times. the difference in quite clear. Only 1 term to Rajiv Gandhi in second 35 years term, while in first 35 years 80% was ruled by Nehru/Gandhi family.
So yes for immediate post independence period, your argument holds water. But then Indians don't have much of options in those times. No means of communication. Backward and illiterate population was the reasons of Dynasty rule.
It doesn't sound very democratic, how come democracy chooses successive leaders from a single family and meanwhile in supposedly autocratic country China no leaders are family related. Freedom of Choice is a big irony here.
 
.
I'm not "opposed to Modi"

That's way too shallow and misses the point.

I believe the Sangh and sanghis are a cancer that has taken root deep in India.

Radical excision is now called for. Simple medicines won't work.

Cheers, Doc

Well we feel libtards and sickularists are the cancer of the society which was not allowing us to grow to our potential.
A strong medicine - a chemotherapy of hindutva is needed to cure that cancer. The Cancer cells will fight back and the body may get fever but ultimately it will be wiped out.
 
.
Well we feel libtards and sickularists are the cancer of the society which was not allowing us to grow to our potential.
A strong medicine - a chemotherapy of hindutva is needed to cure that cancer. The Cancer cells will fight back and the body may get fever but ultimately it will be wiped out.

Please be original.

Though I concede it would be difficult for someone used to reading and writing off of saffron colored cue cards.

Cheers, Doc
 
.
Please be original.

Though I concede it would be difficult for someone used to reading and writing off of saffron colored cue cards.

Cheers, Doc
Responded to you in the language you understand.

This is not the political thead so wont respond here. I have written you a response in the Indian Politics thread
 
.
Back
Top Bottom