This is gross mis-representation of real history and reality of 1975. In 1975, india was not as strong as today and world geo politics was under different order. Beside that realty Indian intervention was requested by some Awami leadership (loyal to Sheikh Mujib) but india for its own interest in Sheikh Mujib elimination stayed away from intervening. Why Tajuddin was propped up by Indians to challenge Sheikh Mujib leadership would answer some these questions. It was Chinese intelligence who exposed Indian plot around Tajuddin. My source was none other than Sheikh Mujib principal secretary who had direct relation and link with then indian PM and other leadership.
So before you present your brand of naive and ignorant history be mindful about that.
Since the 1/11, Moeen govt and now awami stooges are moving Bangladesh towards Bhutan/Sikkim status. Here we are exposing who and how Awami stooges are selling our sovereignty and moving Bangladesh towards that status.
India after peelkhana massacre massed strike force close to Bangladesh border and threatened with military intervention to save Awami stooge regime. And you are asking us to look the other way in order to divert attention from indo-Awami plot? Let readers be judge of what you are up to?
I agree to your assumption that I am naive in understanding Indian doctrine and strategy. In fact, I am less intelligent than your pet dog. But, can you tell me how Indian intervention could have revived Sk. Mujib to life after already being killed? About Pranab Mukherjee's statement, he himself refused after this news that he ever said those things. There was an 'you tube video' of his interview.
About the other news clip of indian troop movement after the Pilkhana mutiny. Please note one thing, when Gen. Moeen ordered 100,000 troops out of cantonements and to the districts immediately after the 1/11, India also ordered more or similar number of troops to move to the east probably from Madhya Pradesh.
Military generals always act like this. War or no war, whenever Pakistan moves a division to Indian front, India will immediately reciprocate with a bigger force. So, how do you evaluate this thing?
By the way, was it possible for India to revive Sk. Hasina to life after she was already killed in a supposedly military coup after Pilkhana mutiny? Please note that India needs at least 60 days preparation to move its troops across the border. No Indian general will be that stupid to attack a country with only two hours' preparation, even if ordered by the PM.
Another point, why do you think India can suddenly cross the INTERNATIONAL BORDER and attack an independent country? India does not probably think BD to be a small LADDU, grasp it and eat it. Moreover, India is part of world community, it has to think of international reaction and its position in the world community. I believe that Indian politicians are not that naive as you are thinking of them.
Indians are not as impulsive as Yahya Khan or Khaled Mosharraf was. This is why they did not attack in 1975, and not that it was comparetively weak then. In fact, comparing to those days, BD is much stronger today. Indians do not eat cow meat and eat more ghee than us. They have better MAGZ. Please do not fool yourself and others by always talking about a fake 'Tiger attack.' No one then will take you seriously.
However, we must be vigilant about the AH so that India cannot get an undue advantage from this arrangement. I personally believe a route that enters BD from India and enters Burma from BD is the best for all three countries.