Islamic faith&Secularism
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2013
- Messages
- 4,224
- Reaction score
- -9
- Country
- Location
Anka-S delivery will involve the reinforcement of the wings and training of operators will finish soon.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@cabatli_53 Bro! There's footage of Anka test firing MAM-L at IDEF'17 with CATS E/O.
Where is it bro? How can I watch it?
Bayraktar flies higher than Anka.Bayraktar is a good UAV against Terror Organisations, with small scale operation zone. Because Bayraktar can fly above MANPADS range. Anka can climb higher altitutes and can even stay out of enemy's small/medium range air-defense systems( depends on systems), with SAT-COM capability with very huge operation zone.
Bayraktar flies higher than Anka.
Without any weapon load, yes, you are right. With 2 MAM-L, nope, it can barely reach 17.000 feet.Bayraktar flies higher than Anka.
You are right. But I stand corrected. The point is, you can't compare them based on their altitudes or endurances. I released a ballon to the sky last week and it is still flying but what is its use if it can't carry any (good) stuff.Bayraktar couldn't take off If you installed Satcom, Sar and 300T. They are racing in different leagues.
I didn't know that. Do you have a source?Without any weapon load, yes, you are right. With 2 MAM-L, nope, it can barely reach 17.000 feet.
You are right. But I stand corrected. The point is, you can't compare them based on their altitudes or endurances. I released a ballon to the sky last week and it is still flying but what is its use if it can't carry any (good) stuff.
huh that is good then i probably got confused because there are so many variants of anka (one of which flies at 18k ft even) while there is only one bayraktar tb-2Anka with B variant payload has reached 30500ft altitude in trials, while 27500ft is the max altitude Bayraktar TB-2 with E/O reached until now.
I didn't know that. Do you have a source?