What's new

AK disagrees with Bhusan on Kashmir

This Bhushan fellow should stick to his dramas in the court room. He knows squat about Kashmir!
 
@KRAIT @ranjeet as I was saying, this is the time to wait and watch for the official manifesto. Lets not jump the gun yet.

'Referendum on army in Kashmir': Arvind Kejriwal disagrees with Prashant Bhushan's comment | NDTV.com
So happened to the promise of "we are going to bring a different kind of Politics" when you are resorting to old tactics. Sack him from the party if they want to bring in the new era of politics. If they can't do it then what's the difference between AAP and congress? One disowns Diggy's comments and AAP is following them from distancing themselves from Prashant Bhushan.
 
So happened to the promise of "we are going to bring a different kind of Politics" when you are resorting to old tactics. Sack him from the party if they want to bring in the new era of politics. If they can't do it then what's the difference between AAP and congress? One disowns Diggy's comments and AAP is following them from distancing themselves from Prashant Bhushan.

You're clutiching at straws. One of their leaders has a difference of opinion and you throw muck at them for addressing it? Let me also tell you that in a political party one sided views are not good. Discussing all sides is a good thing.
 
You're clutiching at straws. One of their leaders has a difference of opinion and you throw muck at them for addressing it? Let me also tell you that in a political party one sided views are not good. Discussing all sides is a good thing.
If you think raising concern about anti-national stance of a founding leader of a Populist party is clutching to straws then I guess we can't come to any conclusive agreement. Prashant Bhushan is a loose canon and he will end up hurting AAP
 
I believe this is the AAP party line. Only that this is divulged too early by an idealist who has no idea about electoral politics.
 
If you think raising concern about anti-national stance of a founding leader of a Populist party is clutching to straws then I guess we can't come to any conclusive agreement. Prashant Bhushan is a loose canon and he will end up hurting AAP

And I thought you wanted AAP to fail. In reality Bhushan's stance came after he was a part of a commission on Kashmir. The difference is not in the conclusion he has come to- that we need to reduce army presence, but in timing- he thinks it's right now, we will not agree because terrorism continues. So don't make it bigger than it is. Someday, when things have settled down we'd definitely want the army back in the barracks so that normal life can resume. You can't dispute that!
 
of course he had to.
nahi to use bhi chaata maar deta koi
 
And I thought you wanted AAP to fail. In reality Bhushan's stance came after he was a part of a commission on Kashmir. The difference is not in the conclusion he has come to- that we need to reduce army presence, but in timing- he thinks it's right now, we will not agree because terrorism continues. So don't make it bigger than it is. Someday, when things have settled down we'd definitely want the army back in the barracks so that normal life can resume. You can't dispute that!
Which Indian in his right mind would mind change in the corrupt system.
 
Its all cheap politics if AK don't agree with it and its not AAP's official version then why don't he expel prashant bhushan or ask him to apologize?
In AAP - this is not a fringe group. Prashant Bhusan, Binayak Sen etc are in large numbers. Their intentions may be good(most prob not) or bad, but their consequences will be terrible. Especially for me.
 
Its all cheap politics if AK don't agree with it and its not AAP's official version then why don't he expel prashant bhushan or ask him to apologize?

One issue doesn't determine the person. There are several, especially anti-corruption where Bhushan's sweat and blood have contributed to AAP. The question is will bhushan compromise, if he does he can continue. Else, he'll leave on moral agreement grounds. 'explusion' has a negative connotation. He's not stolen anything or commited a crime. He's just a hardcore liberal which is why he has a line on something we don't agree with.
 
@kurup

I found the answer to your question finally and with proof this time.:)
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom