Airbus Inks 160 Aircraft Deal in China, to Open New Assembly Line in Tianjin

[beijingwalker]

What part of that comment is incorrect?

Chinese government promotes true globalisation and almost never tries to interfere with private businesses dealing with foreign business partners, it's US always using sanctions or other barriers to limit or totally forbid their private businesses operating normally with foreign partners.

U.S. companies are bearing the brunt of Trump's China tariffs, says Moody’s

Moody's said American importers absorbed more than 90% of additional costs resulting from the 20% U.S. tariff on Chinese goods.

www.cnbc.com

 

[VCheng]

Chinese government promotes true globalisation and almost never tries to interfere with private businesses dealing with foreign business partners, it's US always using sanctions to forbid their private businesses operating normally with foreign partners.

If China is promoting "true" globalization, why does it not let its currency float? To keep tilting the field tilted unfairly towards itself. If China's plays by the WTO rules it has signed on to, there is no need for sanctions, or if it respects other people's sovereng right. It is quite easy.

 

[beijingwalker]

If China is promoting "true" globalization, why does it not let its currency float? To keep tilting the field tilted unfairly towards itself. If China's plays by the WTO rules it has signed on to, there is no need for sanctions, or if it respects other people's sovereng right. It is quite easy.

Is China the only country US is sanctioning or sanctioned? You keep showing your ignorance to everyone here.

 

[VCheng]

Is China the only country US is sanctioning or sanctioned? You keep showing your ignorance to everyone here.

Other countries may have their own reasons for being sanctioned (like Russia), but clearly China's claims of promoting "true" globalization are dishonest, and you brought that up.

 

[beijingwalker]

Other countries may have their own reasons for being sanctioned (like Russia), but clearly China's claims of promoting "true" globalization are dishonest, and you brought that up.

Who told you globalization means you have to freely float your currency? of course China is a big promoter of the globalisation, or least a better practitioner than US. don't forget that China is the biggest global trader and almost the biggest trading partner of every single country.

 

[VCheng]

Who told you globalization means you have to freely float your currency? of course China is a big promoter of the globalisation, don't forget that China is the biggest global trader and almost the biggest trading partner of every single country. or least a better practitioner than US.

How do you think China is able to undercut other suppliers of the goods it produces? By manipulating its currency to continue to run surpluses with other countries. Not fair.

 

[etylo]

And yet Boeing keeps on making better and better planes, so clearly the problems are fixed. And new problems, if any are found, will be fixed too. That is how products improve. The strategic relations, or the lack thereof, between China and USA cannot make that process its hostage.



What part of that comment is incorrect?

The fixes are no up to satisfaction, thats why countries in the world are not buying Boeing airplanes except like fools India and Taiwan that was more or less pressured to do so. Of course, strategic relation between countries matter, thats how countries and people do business, for example, US wont sell China any defence equipment.

 

[VCheng]

The fixes are no up to satisfaction, thats why countries in the world are not buying Boeing airplanes except like fools India and Taiwan that was more or less pressured to do so. Of course, strategic relation between countries matter, thats how countries and people do business, for example, US wont sell China any defence equipment.

It's okay. As long as Boeing finds enough customers other than China, it will do just fine.

 

[beijingwalker]

How do you think China is able to undercut other suppliers of the goods it produces? By manipulating its currency to continue to run surpluses with other countries. Not fair.

You can take it to WTO if you think it's unfair, but US always uses sanctions against any countries they don't like , they even sanction their allies, those sanctions also hurt US own business owners, so don't tell me that US government just leaves private businesses alone and totally hands off.

 

[VCheng]

You can take it to WTO if you think it's unfair, but US always uses sanctions against any countries they don't like , they even sanction their allies, those sanctions also hurt US own business owners, so don't tell me that US government just leaves private businesses alone and totally hands off.

Sure, let that be another discussion. Airbus can sell to China all it wants. After all, EU will follow its best interests, just like USA will. And China can buy from whoever will sell to them. No problems there.

 

[leviathan]

How do you think China is able to undercut other suppliers of the goods it produces? By manipulating its currency to continue to run surpluses with other countries. Not fair.

Then india should beat China in export since their currency devalued 60% in past ten years...

 

[VCheng]

Then india should beat China in export since their currency devalued 60% in past ten years...

ROFL. Nope. By your logic, Pakistan should export even more than India. China uses its currency manipulation to run surpluses and does not allow it to float freely for that reason, in violation of its international commitments.

 

[S10]

China needs to get C919 and C929 certified by the Europeans. I don't think Boeing is necessary anymore. Airbus can act as the sole foreign supplier while COMAC can fill the rest.

 

[etylo]

It's okay. As long as Boeing finds enough customers other than China, it will do just fine.

Good luck, thats 25% world market Boeing is giving up in the future, I bet Airbus is going to win out over Boeing in the competition of survival.

 

[VCheng]

Good luck, thats 25% world market Boeing is giving up in the future, I bet Airbus is going to win out over Boeing in the competition of survival.

You can bet any way you like, of course. Airbus and Boeing are really competitive with each other, and will remain so, but more relevant is the fact that China is decades behind either one of them.