AGNI VI: EYE ON WORLD, ACTUAL EXPECTED RANGE

[Anony]

The basic or notable challenges to overcome when you thought of 10000km ICBM after having 5500km ICBM are as follows:-

1. Navigation System - Almost a new technology or building from scratch need to be done.

2. Booster - To eject missile of that weight.

3. Composites - To strengthen the outer layer of the missile and also need to control the very high temperature that generates while re-entering.

4. Miniaturization - Doubling the range without increasing the weight of the system significantly.(Very tough)

5. And few others.

 

[Guynextdoor2]

make an SLBM out of this and you'll see all the fun

 

[rashtriya.rifles]

IMO a SLBM version of A5 would be a much better deal than a 10000000 km ICBM presently

 

[Mitro]

The time we can make a ICBM with more then 10000 KM and a Nuclear submarine with ICBM i don't think anybody can stop us from becoming PERMANENT Member of UN with Veto Power.

 

[Skull and Bones]

The time we can make a ICBM with more then 10000 KM and a Nuclear submarine with ICBM i don't think anybody can stop us from becoming PERMANENT Member of UN with Veto Power.

That has nothing to do with being a permanent UN member with VETO power.

 

[Mitro]

Are you kidding me

See all the Veto power what is common in them Nuclear power,ICBM,Nuclear SUB with ICBM

That has nothing to do with being a permanent UN member with VETO power.

 

[Jayanta]

Although a range of 6000KM+ isn't required, what's wrong in keeping the doors open. Any ways I do not think an A7 would be required...work should be done to improve the performance of the previous ones, try to make them mobile, reduction in size etc. arm the borders with as many as possible. DRDO should focus on the other pending projects and serious concerns in the long pending aviation (LCA) and Tank (Arjun) projects...also to the AMCA and ModernMBT...FINSAS etc.

 

[kurup]

Are you kidding me

See all the Veto power what is common in them Nuclear power,ICBM,Nuclear SUB with ICBM

P5 countries had veto power even before they had ICBM or Nuclear SUB with ICBM .

Having an ICBM or Nuclear SUB with ICBM doesnot guarentee a permanent seat in UNSC.

 

[priti]

is it geared or auto?

 

[Mitro]

But have you seen any body having ICBM and Nuclear sub with ICBM other then P5 member its big "NO"

Why you think they work their A** out to protect the NUclear proliberation they want to control the desicion making in this world.

Israel don't disclose their Nuclear bomb and their ICBM because they can easily manupulate US and do what ever they want.

As soon as our ICBM with 12000 km with MIRV and Nuclear Submarine with these Missile The West will be Shi**** in their pants.

P5 countries had veto power even before they had ICBM or Nuclear SUB with ICBM .

Having an ICBM or Nuclear SUB with ICBM doesnot guarentee a permanent seat in UNSC.

 

[Srinivas]

But have you seen any body having ICBM and Nuclear sub with ICBM other then P5 member its big "NO"

Why you think they work their A** out to protect the NUclear proliberation they want to control the desicion making in this world.

Israel don't disclose their Nuclear bomb and their ICBM because they can easily manupulate US and do what ever they want.

As soon as our ICBM with 12000 km with MIRV and Nuclear Submarine with these Missile The West will be Shi**** in their pants.

Having missiles with greater range and sophisticated tech. is like an insurance policy from the threats originating around the globe.

To be precise India do not need any veto power, since the world order has changed from 1940's UN first formed to now. The regional blocks will rise in case UN donot reform.

 

[Koovie]

The time we can make a ICBM with more then 10000 KM and a Nuclear submarine with ICBM i don't think anybody can stop us from becoming PERMANENT Member of UN with Veto Power.

The problem is that no one, except Russia maybe, wants to have India as a full member, even if they openly declare that they welcome us like the US does.

The truth is that we wont ally ourself with any one and thats the problem. Better stay neutral and independent.

 

[Mitro]

If Libya or Iraq was a nuclear Nation with ICBM do you think the west can do what they did to this nation BIG NO.If Our country got ICBM that can easily target any where in this world .This Power comes with responsiblity and if they are not going to gives us responsibility then the important of UN will lose .and if a disbute occur and UN goes against us then we will not care about UN they cannot do any thing to us.

Having missiles with greater range and sophisticated tech. is like an insurance policy from the threats originating around the globe.

To be precise India do not need any veto power, since the world order has changed from 1940's UN first formed to now. The regional blocks will rise in case UN donot reform.

The problem is that no one, except Russia maybe, wants to have India as a full member, even if they openly declare that they welcome us like the US does.

The truth is that we wont ally ourself with any one and thats the problem. Better stay neutral and independent.

 

[Rocky25]

71 is a different case ICBM is something different. Point is you have the building blocks but then you are also not a UNSC member and you are also not a signatory of CTBT and NPT. First become the member and then show the 10000+ km ICBM. capability. Or take world in your favor and launch it.

You need weapons according to your requirement. India has PSLV which can be used as ICBM plus it will not take more than 4 years I guess to develop it.

India lost too much in the name of getting permanent UNSC seat!

 

[Screambowl]

India lost too much in the name of getting permanent UNSC seat!

you are right because we have to act like soft state but once you get UNSC seat you will get more than what you have lost.