Afzal khan and treachery of Shivaji

[dawn_news]

Aehh Mr.logic.Just google about India's history.You will get answer.India created its own civilization.It is correct ,foreign invasion happens in our history .And our culture and language absorbs some parts of invading culture .But still we follow that basic Indian culture and religion even if there is some slightest change it is still indigenous.
You may boast and claim that your culture is similar to that barabarian invaders.But our civilization is created us by our own hardwork.So we dont believe in AIT bullshit.

Ok all right, lets end this debate.

 

[SrNair]

Ok all right, lets end this debate.

Ok .with pleasure

 

[anonymus]

@Nuri Natt .

If you want to get an account of genetic anthropology of subcontinent,at least get it from proper sources like The genographic project of national geographic rather than filth of sites like harappa sharappa who have no scientific methodology and are run by amatures.

Here:

Who Am I: Reference Populations Overview

You could submit your DNA for analaysis even thought i would advise against it.

 

[SrNair]

@Nuri Natt .

If you want to get an account of genetic anthropology of subcontinent,at least get it from proper sources like The genographic project of national geographic rather than filth of sites like harappa sharappa who have no scientific methodology and are run by amatures.

Here:

Who Am I: Reference Populations Overview

You could submit your DNA for analaysis even thought i would advise against it.

But @anonymus there is a problem in the South Indian part.And I can see in almost all other sites.They only study the DNA of SC/ST or Adivais.(May be they are the ancient people).But they dont take DNA of upper class like Brahmins ,Tamil brahmins ,Nairs ,Christians etc why is that?
Sorry for offtopic.

 

[anonymus]

But @anonymus there is a problem in the South Indian part.And I can see in almost all other sites.They only study the DNA of SC/ST or Adivais.(May be they are the ancient people).But they dont take DNA of upper class like Brahmins ,Tamil brahmins ,Nairs ,Christians etc why is that?
Sorry for offtopic.

If they are taking randomised samples, it is highly unlikely that the sample would be from a higher caste person since their number is very low ( Brahmins are 4% ). Anyway overall genetic profile of an population is a macro variable and could not provide fine genetic breakups.

If you want to specifically find your ancestry, you could buy their kit ( but it cost close to 12000 rupees )

 

[SrNair]

If they are taking randomised samples, it is highly unlikely that the sample would be from a higher caste person since their number is very low ( Brahmins are 4% ). Anyway overall genetic profile of an population is a macro variable and could not provide fine genetic breakups.

If you wan't to specifically find your ancestry, you could buy their kit ( but it cost close to 12000 rupees )

Are you from south India?Kerala?

 

[anonymus]

Are you from south India?Kerala?

No from North (Delhi/West UP)

 

[INDIC]

But @anonymus there is a problem in the South Indian part.And I can see in almost all other sites.They only study the DNA of SC/ST or Adivais.(May be they are the ancient people).But they dont take DNA of upper class like Brahmins ,Tamil brahmins ,Nairs ,Christians etc why is that?
Sorry for offtopic.

The genetic test of Harvard Medical school is very informative. They have also put huge doubt on Aryan invasion theory seeing the high percentage of ANI all across India because before so called Aryan invasion the population of India was too high based on cultivation, thus the Aryan invasion should have brought same amount of people from outside which is impossible to generalize.

 

[SrNair]

The genetic test of Harvard Medical school is very informative. They have also put huge doubt on Aryan invasion theory seeing the high percentage of ANI all across India because before so called Aryan invasion the population of India was too high based on cultivation, thus the Aryan invasion should have brought same amount of people from outside which is impossible to generalize.

So you think some foreign elements in South India?

No from North (Delhi/West UP)

Did you test you ancestry with that kit?

 

[INDIC]

So you think some foreign elements in South India?

South Indian indeed carries the Eurasian ancestry and can be related to the human migration across the world, you may know that Europeans(except the Slavs) carry distant genetic similarities with Indians. Culturally only Indo-Iranians shared a similar culture because they lived in proximity with each other, other Indo-European people share distant similarity. Since Europeans wanted to fake themselves as Aryans for their white supremacy, they were more desperate to make their connections with Indians.

 

[anonymus]

So you think some foreign elements in South India?

Certainly there is foreign element.

See, Indian subcontinent is geographically shaped in such a way it act as an collecting bowl of anyone migrating towards East. In North and North East, there is impregnable Himalayan mountain range and in South, South East and South west, there is Indian ocean there is only one way to enter India in large numbers and that is from Northwest through Bolan and Khyber pass of which Bolan pass was the major route of migration. There is very little chance that any region of India is free from foreign admixture.

Did you test you ancestry with that kit?

No,

Never had 12000 rupees to waste on test.

 

[SrNair]

South Indian indeed carries the Eurasian ancestry and can be related to the human migration across the world, you may know that Europeans(except the Slavs) carry distant genetic similarities with Indians. Culturally only Indo-Iranians shared a similar culture because they lived in proximity with each other, other Indo-European people share distant similarity. Since Europeans wanted to fake themselves as Aryans for their white supremacy, they were more desperate to make their connections with Indians.

Ok got it.One last question what is this Slav people?

 

[anonymus]

South Indian indeed carries the Eurasian ancestry and can be related to the human migration across the world, you may know that Europeans(except the Slavs) carry distant genetic similarities with Indians. Culturally only Indo-Iranians shared a similar culture because they lived in proximity with each other, other Indo-European people share distant similarity. Since Europeans wanted to fake themselves as Aryans for their white supremacy, they were more desperate to make their connections with Indians.

People have migrated to India since 40000 years. The ethnic group which max muller dubbed as Aryan was neither the first nor last.

Even after Aryan migration, there has been three major migration [ parthians (sakas), Kushans and Huns ] and one minor (Greek)

 

[SrNair]

Certainly there is foreign element.

See, Indian subcontinent is geographically shaped in such a way it act as an collecting bowl of anyone migrating towards East. In North and North East, there is impregnable Himalayan mountain range and in South, South East and South west, there is Indian ocean there is only one way to enter India in large numbers and that is from Northwest through Bolan and Khyber pass of which Bolan pass was the major route of migration. There is very little chance that any region of India is free from foreign admixture.



No,

Never had 12000 rupees to waste on test.

So India is a melting pot of Human race.All races are together
Too right mate .No on will destroy their 12000 rs for this ancestry BS .We can buy a good Micromax Canvas for that.

 

[INDIC]

Ok got it.One last question what is this Slav people?

East Europeans like Russians, Ukranians, Poles etc. They share a common gene R1a with Indians. Rest of the Europeans carry R1b which shows the Indo-European people split tens of thousands of years ago.