After Syrian, whats next ?

[MooshMoosh]

They have the option to either launch an attack on Iran's nuclear facilities if no agreement was reached or simply welcome another nuclear power in the region and that is KSA.

We don't care about Iran's nuclear plans, the country needs to be destroyed, invaded, occupied, put ayatollahs on death squads and hand it back to the Shah or someone we trust

 

[Juice]

Lol...I love this! Like taking candy from retarded children. You see, I am 47 years old. Was around and old enough to follow the news in those days (USSR in AFG, Iran-Iraq war etc.). THE TALIBAN DID NOT EXIST in 1985 Children. Those were Mujahideen. Native Afghan rebels with the usual assortment of foreign religious nuts. After the Russian left....we lost all interest in the area (big mistake). The Mujahadeen, like all retards....started fighting over the scraps. Endless civil war. Then...long after the US left, the Taliban were form from religious students in northern Pakistan (Mostly Afghan refugees, some others). They were supported by Pakistan, who had been impressed by the US use of wackos to further national interest...and thought they could do the same. If you think the Talibs are the same as the Mujahadeen, remember Massoud from the northern alliance. He was one of the left-overs of those we had supported. Not only NOT Taliban, was one of the few left to resist those idiots.

 

[!eon]

Next is Iran mark my words.......

No way, who benefited most from wars in Iraq and Afghanistan even more than uncle sam ?

 

[iranigirl2]

Lol...I love this! Like taking candy from retarded children. You see, I am 47 years old. Was around and old enough to follow the news in those days (USSR in AFG, Iran-Iraq war etc.). THE TALIBAN DID NOT EXIST in 1985 Children. Those were Mujahideen. Native Afghan rebels with the usual assortment of foreign religious nuts. After the Russian left....we lost all interest in the area (big mistake). The Mujahadeen, like all retards....started fighting over the scraps. Endless civil war. Then...long after the US left, the Taliban were form from religious students in northern Pakistan (Mostly Afghan refugees, some others). They were supported by Pakistan, who had been impressed by the US use of wackos to further national interest...and thought they could do the same. If you think the Talibs are the same as the Mujahadeen, remember Massoud from the northern alliance. He was one of the left-overs of those we had supported. Not only NOT Taliban, was one of the few left to resist those idiots.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...n-robert-fisk-met-him-in-almatig-1465715.html

 

[Juice]

Anti-Soviet warrior puts his army on the road to peace: The Saudi businessman who recruited mujahedin now uses them for large-scale building projects in Sudan. Robert Fisk met him in Almatig - World - News - The Independent

Can you not read? We supported Mujahideen. Funneled money to them from Pakistan. Bin Laden was one of those "assorted religious nuts" I mentioned. We supported the Afghan resistance. Laden was a volunteer from Arabia who came and said "let me give you money, as I am rich, and pretend I am an important religious fighter. The mujahedeen didn't turn down his cash, surprise. To say we supported him would be the same as saying I supported Dahmer because I contribute to the boy scouts (he was one). By bringing this up you actually prove my point about us never having anything to do with the Taliban....as they never considered him as one of their own....only a guest.

 

[Thorough Pro]

You may be old enough but all you stated is not 100% right. Taliban were not formed in Northern Pakistan, they evolved from within Afghanistan as a result of brutal rapes and killings by northern alliance war lords against Afghan Pushtuns and the fact is they were quite successful in bringing peace to Afghanistan and curtailing drug production.

Lol...I love this! Like taking candy from retarded children. You see, I am 47 years old. Was around and old enough to follow the news in those days (USSR in AFG, Iran-Iraq war etc.). THE TALIBAN DID NOT EXIST in 1985 Children. Those were Mujahideen. Native Afghan rebels with the usual assortment of foreign religious nuts. After the Russian left....we lost all interest in the area (big mistake). The Mujahadeen, like all retards....started fighting over the scraps. Endless civil war. Then...long after the US left, the Taliban were form from religious students in northern Pakistan (Mostly Afghan refugees, some others). They were supported by Pakistan, who had been impressed by the US use of wackos to further national interest...and thought they could do the same. If you think the Talibs are the same as the Mujahadeen, remember Massoud from the northern alliance. He was one of the left-overs of those we had supported. Not only NOT Taliban, was one of the few left to resist those idiots.

 

[Juice]

Lol....I love debating kids who know zero history and weren't around when this all happened....you and the kitty should split the tin-foil.

You may be old enough but all you stated is not 100% right. Taliban were not formed in Northern Pakistan, they evolved from within Afghanistan as a result of brutal rapes and killings by northern alliance war lords against Afghan Pushtuns and the fact is they were quite successful in bringing peace to Afghanistan and curtailing drug production.

I was around and am more familiar than most, but I didn't live in the region so I may miss a few details. From what I understand "Taliban" means "student" and the name came from Pakistani Madrassas. And yes, I agree that the former Mujahideen were out of control...and tearing the country apart.

 

[iranigirl2]

Can you not read? We supported Mujahideen. Funneled money to them from Pakistan. Bin Laden was one of those "assorted religious nuts" I mentioned. We supported the Afghan resistance. Laden was a volunteer from Arabia who came and said "let me give you money, as I am rich and pretend I am an important religious fighter. The mujahedeen didn't turn down his cash, surprise. To say we supported him would be the same as saying I supported Dahmer because I contribute to the boy scouts (he was one). By bringing this up you actually prove my point about us never having anything to do with the Taliban....as they never considered him as one of their own....only a guest.

 

[Juice]

And, this has what to do with the Taliban? He was busy piling up dead Iranians. And, yes...we thanked him. You should thank god we let him do it, instead of ourselves. If you perhaps forget, you invaded sovereign US territory. Most here thought nuking you pukes was the best answer. Instead, we looked away while your neighbor slaughtered your un-trained kids. If we had still been allies....he wouldn't have dared. And when he got too big for his britches...we took his country (something Iran couldn't do in 8 years) and stretched his neck.

 

[Serpentine]

We don't care about Iran's nuclear plans, the country needs to be destroyed, invaded, occupied, put ayatollahs on death squads and hand it back to the Shah or someone we trust

First get your country out of this big mess and then give us a speech about other countries.

 

[iranigirl2]

And, this has what to do with the Taliban? He was busy piling up dead Iranians. And, yes...we thanked him. You should thank god we let him do it, instead of ourselves. If you perhaps forget, you invaded sovereign US territory. Most here thought nuking you pukes was the best answer. Instead, we looked away while your neighbor slaughtered your un-trained kids. If we had still been allies....he wouldn't have dared. And when he got too big for his britches...we took his country (something Iran couldn't do in 8 years) and stretched his neck.

 

[illusion8]

The next project is definitely Iran. I mean they are not even done with Syria and they are already talking about Iran.


Iranian leaders know this, this is why Rohuani a reformist won the Presidential election.


He is already implemnting change, so you won't see any "color revolution" in Iran in the future.


So, the Western powers will definitely try to push for a war, False Flag and then say "oh it was Iran, we have to attack it and "help" the people there".

After Iran , it's Pakistan's turn.

After Syria it would be Lebanon and then possibly Iran, Pakistan is not in the equation as it's a Western puppet and would not require a fight to cave in as it is - they would hand over power - which they already do by electing foreign installed leaders and the army being pro western and Saud already.

 

[Jihad_]

Double....

 

[Jihad_]

@iranigirl2
Little slow in the head, eh? Iraq had no direct link to 9/11. This is true. However, the Taliban....who in case you missed the briefing, were in charge of Afg.....gave shelter to the planning org. of 9/11 (basically their general staff). We said hand them over, they made all kinds of conditions. In case you weren't here at the time, when we said "hand them over", we weren't in the mood for snubs and stalling tactics. As far as Iraq, not directly responsible. But after 9/11 we realized that Muslims can't be left without adult supervision....and a quick look at a map shows why Iraq is a natural fault line (borders many players in the region). WMD's was just an excuse...but as an Iranian, you should know why we picked that excuse (They used them on Iran...wasn't a stretch to say they had them). As far as helped Iran, yes BOTH Iraq and the Taliban were enemies of Iran (When the Beard club for men in Iran says you are religious wackos....you may have an issue). But as usual...enemies of the US and Iran...the US does something...the Iranians issue fatwas. (and you guys border them....we had to come across half the world to give them their justly deserved beat-down)

Taliban only had 1 condition: give proof Bin Laden & co was behind it and we will hand them over. Offcourse no response...

 

[Juice]

I am so glad you agree that turning a blind eye to gas attacks is wrong. We did it before for narrow national policy....never again! As you see from this post, Irani-girl thinks turning a blind eye to gas attacks is moraly repugnant. I am glad you see why we can't let it happen again.

Taliban only had 1 condition: give proof Bin Laden & co was behind it and we will hand them over. Offcourse no response...

Perhaps English escapes you...we were in the mood for NO conditions. And if you think we were gonna jump through hoops to please Mullahs after 9/11.....you are sadly mistaken.