What's new

After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

I am sure nothing will change but I am really glad that we have a country where something like this can be discussed rationally.
Indeed, whether or not this results in something, the fact that this can be discussed rationally and legally instead of howling and bombs that you'd expect in a different South Asian Muslim country is a testament to Bangladesh.

It is this attitude which will ensure that Bangladesh continues to progress and develop.
 
.
Whether or not it is implemented or not.. Bangladesh has surely earned more of my respect.. Salute
Not that it hadn't earlier, but it has been surprising in it's progress.. From education to population control to economic development and now this.. Kudos.. Soon Bangladesh along will be Sri-Lanka will be model quasi developed nations whose suit India, Pakistan and others can follow.
 
.
wow..I didnt know BDs are so broad minded and pro-secular...It really changed my perception about people of BD....Hats off guys! Unfortunately in my country...the so called biggest secular nation on earth...some people are making fun of pro-secular people and parties!
 
.
Amend the constitution is much easier task than to amend a society's mindset. A country can be secular just on paper but to form a true secular society in this subcontinent is a mission impossible. It took hundreds of years of social reform before Western Europe has come closer to a secular society.
 
.
After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion

After Rash of Islamist Killings, Bangladesh High Court Considers Eliminating Islam as State Religion
163
0
protest-against-murders-of-secular-writers-bloggers-publishers-in-bangladesh-AP-640x480.jpg

AP Photo/ A.M. Ahad

by Thomas D. Williams, Ph.D.1 Mar 201693

After a recent spate of killings of members of religious minorities by Islamic extremists, the supreme court of Bangladesh has begun hearing arguments challenging Islam’s privileged status as official state religion, a measure applauded by religious liberty activists and minority leaders.
In 1988, Bangladesh’s military government amended the country’s constitution to declare Islam as the official state religion. That very same year, a group of 15 prominent writers, former judges, educators and cultural activists filed a petition contesting the legitimacy of the move, but the courts did not act to review the petition until now.

In recent months Bangladesh has experienced a “surge in killings” of members of Hindu, Christian and Shi’ite religious minorities, which authorities have said are the work of Islamic extremist groups.

Despite warnings from U.S. intelligence that the Islamic State is stepping up recruitment activity in the South Asian country, the Bangladeshi government has insisted that its Islamist problems are home grown.

“We have made arrests on each and every so-called ISIS-claimed attack,” said one Bangladesh police official. “The attackers have confessed their crimes in court. They have also confessed being a Jamaatul Mujahedin Bangladesh member, and denied any linkage with ISIS,” he said.

On February 29, Bangladesh’s Supreme Court officially began hearing arguments on the petition disputing the constitutionality of the adoption of Islam as the state religion.

Bangladesh’s original constitution, adopted soon after the nation split from Pakistan in 1971, declared the country to be a secular state.

It was the military ruler H. M. Ershard who decreed Islam to be the state religion in 1988, inserting an eighth amendment to the constitution to that effect. The legality of that move is what is now being disputed.

Religious minority leaders have commended the high court’s move to reexamine the state religion issue.

Bishop Bejoy N. D’Cruze of Sylhet, chairman of the Catholic bishops’ Christian Unity and Interreligious Dialogue Commission, said that the decision to review the petition inspires great hope for religious minorities.

“When a state officially accepts a state religion, then it puts barricades for communal harmony because it recognizes supremacy of a particular religion and makes other religions inferior,” D’Cruze said, adding that recent extremist attacks on religious minorities are an indirect consequence of the adoption of a state religion.

“We hope and demand that every religion in Bangladesh are put on an equal footing in terms of status and respect,” he said.

Another religious leader, Govinda Chadra Pramanik, secretary of Bangladesh National Hindu Grand Alliance, said that by sponsoring Islam as the official religion, the state has created grounds for the persecution of minorities, especially Hindus.

“The state religion established the supremacy of Islam over other religions, offering a weapon to radical Islamists to abuse minority communities. Moreover, Islam gets more attention from the state, not other religions, which is an obstacle to interfaith harmony,” he said.

“As the state religion, Islam put psychological pressure on minorities, and makes them vulnerable to abuse and exploitation. The court must come to the right decision and withdraw it,” he added.

Muslims make up some 90 percent of Bangladesh’s population, while Hindus account for 8 percent and other religions—including Buddhism and Christianity—make up the rest.

Hates off to BD court. It can set a great example for other religious fanatic islamic countries who uses political islam to do the hell of bad things. IF BD does this, than it will have a great chance of emerging as a very progressive nation after the struggle. Other nation using political Islam are on the verge of being vanish.
 
.
.
Will be interesting to see if the judgement is passed & Islam is removed as being official religion, to be honest I personally don't think that removing islam as an official state religion will have any negative impact, islam doesn't need to be an official state religion to survive, it has survived for years in Europe etc & is still growing... States don't help religion it's the people. Who follow it in its true form. Then again only Allah knows the best
 
.
That state religion article is simply an anomaly imposed by an illegal dictator remained in constitution due to hesitance of later democratic govt. to remove it, obviously not to alienate the ultra-muslim voters.

Illegal dictators do such things, From changing the constitutions arbitrarily to stay in power, Sometimes through religious extremism other times through Ethnic supremacist laws.. Ershad of Bangladesh, Zila ul Haq of Pakistan even at present day Erdogan comes to mind, Mahinda Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka was on the verge of it but the Lankan voters were that bit more politically mature enough to prevent that from happening.. African tin pot dictators are known for coups and extending their terms of power as well

Religious faith is personal, And should be personal.. State and faith needs to be always seperate
 
.
It would be a good move and welcome, and further indication of the strides being taken increasingly off late by Bangladesh as its aspirational population strives to lose the tag of the pygmy of the subcontinent.

It might even pave the way for an eventual reunification with the motherland.
 
.
The separation of state from religion is very difficult for the people in the sub continent. People not only want to impose their religious doctrine on the state but also use religion as a tool to manipulate the reality. Religious belief system may have place at the personal level but it can not be allowed to indoctrinate state policies. Some people may believe in Spider-Man or Superman but they should not and can not force other to believe the same.

Democracy must also protect the minority from tyrannical rule of the majority. If not , there is no point of having democratic system.

Finally, there will be peace in the sub continent one day when people will embrace secularism.
 
. . .
wow..I didnt know BDs are so broad minded and pro-secular...It really changed my perception about people of BD....Hats off guys! Unfortunately in my country...the so called biggest secular nation on earth...some people are making fun of pro-secular people and parties!
Those who are trying to demine or underestimate the polotical importance or influence of secularism as a integriting proces for multinethnic/religious countries will pay the due price.And to understand the extent of the price we only have to look at some countries on our door step.

Religious hubris like the Jamati/BJP or RSS /Hefajot/al qaeda are the snakes of same kind.

The separation of state from religion is very difficult for the people in the sub continent. People not only want to impose their religious doctrine on the state but also use religion as a tool to manipulate the reality. Religious belief system may have place at the personal level but it can not be allowed to indoctrinate state policies. Some people may believe in Spider-Man or Superman but they should not and can not force other to believe the same.

Democracy must also protect the minority from tyrannical rule of the majority. If not , there is no point of having democratic system.

Finally, there will be peace in the sub continent one day when people will embrace secularism.
Yes ,you are precise on your point.It can only be achieved by hundred years of practise.To be precise Europe and the Subcontinent hasn't gone through the same evolution to have it. Where Europe achived it in a natural evolution in subcontinent it was a part of the colonial education and administration system.That's might have a impact on the subcontinents mindset to accept it naturally.But state's secularity is important nontheless.BD was right on track after independence when they accepted secularism as state's basic guidence principle.but dictators like Ershad and later not so but democratic govenments has backstabbed us by using religion for vote bank politics.
 
. .
The present government got re-elected without voters as many critic claim. Why do they need a vote bank ?
Why make unnecessary fuss by irking the religious hubris?
Everything is going as they want,why test the luck by irritating already religiously sensual population?
And what if the opposition decide to attend the next election?why give them a card to play?
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom